广州饱和软土固结过程微孔隙变化的试验分析

›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (S1): 138-144.

广州饱和软土固结过程微孔隙变化的试验分析

周晖^{1, 2}，房营光^{1, 2}，曾铖^{1, 2}

1.华南理工大学土木与交通学院，广州 510641；2.亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室，广州 51

收稿日期:2010-04-23 出版日期:2010-08-10 发布日期:2010-09-09
作者简介:周晖，女，1979年生，讲师，博士研究生，主要从事土体微结构方面的研究.
基金资助:
亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室自主项目（No. 2008ZA11）。

Experimental analysis of micropore change of Guangzhou saturated soft soil in consolidation process

ZHOU Hui^{1, 2}, FANG Ying-guang ^{1, 2,} ZENG Cheng ^{1, 2}

1. School of Civil and Traffic Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, Guangzhou 510641, China

Received:2010-04-23 Online:2010-08-10 Published:2010-09-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

软土的孔隙特征及其变化规律对软土的压缩性和渗透性有重大的影响，软土孔隙特征随荷载变化规律的试验研究为揭示软土排水固结过程与变形规律，建立基于孔隙压缩规律和渗流机制的排水固结模型提供有力依据。利用美国全自动压汞仪，对不同压力下固结的广州番禺淤泥土样的孔隙及其尺度分布进行测试，根据测试结果对土样孔隙尺度分布特征及其随固结压力的变化规律给出了定量分析。试验结果表明：淤泥土中介于0.4～2.5 μm范围的颗粒间及团粒内的小孔隙所占比例最大，而大于10 μm的大孔隙和小于30 nm的超微孔隙所占比例均很小；较大的孔隙更易于被压缩而湮灭或被分裂成微小孔隙；固结压力将显著改变淤泥土的孔隙尺度及其分布特征，以致改变土体的压缩性和渗透性。在固结前期( 200 kPa)孔隙尺度较大，压缩系数和渗透系数较大并随固结压力增加而快速减小；在固结后期( 200 kPa)孔隙尺度小，压缩系数和渗透系数小，且随固结压力增加的变化趋于平缓。

关键词: 饱和软土, 微细观孔隙, 孔隙尺度, 孔隙分布特征, 压缩性, 渗透性

Abstract:

The pore characteristics and the change rule of soft soils have significant influence on their compressibility and permeability. The study can reveal the drainage consolidation process of soft soil and its deformation law so as to provide a strong basis for establishing draining water solidifying model based on the pore compression mechanism of drainage patterns and flow model. AutoPore machine made in United States was used to test pore diameter and pore-scale distribution of Guangzhou Panyu silt soil under different load levels, then gave the quantitative analysis of pore criterion distribution characteristics according to the test results. The studied results have shown that: small pores within particles and aggregates intermediated in the range of 0.4-2.5 μm is the largest proportion in the sludge soil; the number of large pores larger than 10 μm and micro pores less than 30 nm is very small; more large pore more easily be compressed and annihilated or splited into tiny pores; consolidation pressure will significantly change pore scale and pore distribution characteristics of the silt soil which results in the changes of its compressibility and permeability. Pore-scale is greater in the early stage of consolidation( 200 kPa); compression coefficient and permeability coefficient are large and rapid decrease with the increasing consolidation pressure; and pore scale is small in the late consolidation( 200 kPa); compression coefficient and permeability coefficient are small, and with the consolidation pressure change flatten out.

Key words: saturated soft soil, micropore, pore scale, pore distribution characteristics, compressibity, permeability

中图分类号:

TU 411

周晖，房营光，曾铖. 广州饱和软土固结过程微孔隙变化的试验分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 138-144.

ZHOU Hui, FANG Ying-guang, ZENG Cheng. Experimental analysis of micropore change of Guangzhou saturated soft soil in consolidation process[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 138-144.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	李玲, 刘金泉, 刘造保, 刘桃根, 王伟, 邵建富, . 砂-黏土混合物高压压实性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3502-3514.
[2]	沈泰宇, 汪时机, 薛乐, 李贤, 何丙辉, . 微生物沉积碳酸钙固化砂质黏性紫色土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3115-3124.
[3]	龚文惠, 赵旭东, 邱金伟, 李逸, 杨晗. 饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[4]	蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹, 郑俊杰, 周洋, 闫婧, 李展毅. 饱和软土大变形非线性自重固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[5]	李崴, 王者超, 毕丽平, 刘杰, . 辐射流条件下裂隙岩体渗透性表征单元体尺寸与等效渗透系数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 720-727.
[6]	杨鹏, 蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹. 竖井地基的大应变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4049-4056.
[7]	董金玉，王闯，周建军，杨继红，李严威，. 泡沫改良砂卵石土的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 140-148.
[8]	王伟，方志明，李小春, . 沁水盆地煤样静水压力下渗透率实验及模型分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 251-257.
[9]	左宇军，孙文吉斌，邬忠虎，许云飞,. 渗透压–应力耦合作用下页岩渗透性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3253-3260.
[10]	夏长青，胡安峰，崔军，吕文晓，谢康和, . 饱和软土成层地基一维非线性固结解析解[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2858-2864.
[11]	杨建民，霍王文，. 渗透性水平向各向异性导致椭圆形地面沉降漏斗的一个性质[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2960-2976.
[12]	韩冰，梁建文，朱俊，. 深厚饱和软土场地中透镜体对上部结构地震响应的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2227-2236.
[13]	任玉宾，王胤，杨庆. 颗粒级配与形状对钙质砂渗透性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 491-497.
[14]	张强，李小春，胡少斌，牛智勇，汪芳，范坤，邵光强,. 高应力下花岗岩耦合节理在剪切过程中渗透率演化特性[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3641-3650.
[15]	张豫川，姚永国，周泓,. 长龄期改良黄土抗剪强度与渗透性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 170-176.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed