›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1546-1552.

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑三向地应力差时不同钻井条件下井底应力场研究

常德玉,李根生,沈忠厚,黄中伟,田守山曾,史怀忠,宋先知   

  1. 中国石油大学 油气资源与探测国家重点实验室,北京 102249
  • 收稿日期:2010-10-01 出版日期:2011-05-10 发布日期:2011-09-23
  • 作者简介:常德玉,男,1984年生,博士研究生,主要从事石油工程和高压水射流的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目“深井复杂地层安全高效钻井基础研究”资助(No. 2010CB226704)

Study of bottom-hole stress field with differential pressure of 3D in-situ stress under different drilling conditions

CHANG De-yu, LI Gen-sheng, SHEN Zhong-hou, HUANG Zhong-wei,   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
  • Received:2010-10-01 Online:2011-05-10 Published:2011-09-23

摘要: 井底压差和三向地应力是钻井过程中影响井底岩石应力分布的主要因素,从而影响钻井机械钻速。主要针对欠平衡、平衡、过平衡和气体钻井4种钻井条件下三向地应力对井底应力分布进行定量研究。在井底岩石力学分析的基础上,建立了考虑正断层模型下的三向地应力、液柱压力和孔隙压力因素时的井底岩石流-固耦合模型,采用数值计算方法进行求解。结果表明,三向地应力差相同时,井底面岩石最大主应力与井底压差无关,井底面岩石最小主应力随井底压差增大而增大;不同钻井条件下井底面最小主应力与水平最小地应力无关,且随水平最大地应力增大而减小;不同钻井条件下井底面最大主应力与水平最大地应力无关,当井底压差存在时,其随水平最小主应力增加而减小后逐渐趋于稳定;当气体钻井时,其与水平最小主应力也无关。针对走滑断层和逆断层模型时的井底应力场尚需进一步研究。不同井底压差和三向地应力时井底岩石应力分布的定量化研究为实际钻井条件下钻头破岩机制研究和快速高效破岩提供理论基础

关键词: 井底压差, 地应力, 孔隙压力, 流-固耦合, 应力场, 破岩机制

Abstract: The bottom-hole differential pressure and the three-dimensional in-situ differential stress are the main factors during drilling that affect the distribution of the bottom-hole rock stress; and then affect the drilling speed. The purpose of the article is to quantitatively study the effect of the three-dimensional in-situ stress on the bottom-hole stress distribution under the overbalanced, balanced, underbalanced and air drilling condition. On the basis of the mechanical analysis of the bottom-hole rock, the fluid-solid coupling model with the factors of the three-dimensional in-situ stress of the normal fault, fluid column pressure and pore pressure is set up, without analytical solution of the model; and then the numerical solution method is used to resolve it. The results show that the maximum principal stresses of the bottom-hole surface under different drilling conditions are the same; the minor principal stress increases with the increase of the bottom-hole differential pressure. The minor principal stress decreases with the increase of the horizontal maximum in-situ stress, and keeps stable when the horizontal minimum in-situ stress changes under differential drilling condition. The maximum principal stress of the bottom-hole surface firstly decreases with the increase of the horizontal minimum in-situ stress and keeps stable with the existence of the differential pressure and it keeps stable during air drilling while the horizontal minimum in-situ stress changes, and keeps stable when the horizontal maximum in-situ stress changes under differential drilling condition. Distribution of the bottom-hole stress field of the reverse fault and strike-slip fault is to be studied. Quantitative study of the bottom-hole stress distribution with differential pressure of bottom-hole and three-dimensional in-situ stress provides a numerical stimulation method for study of bottom-hole stress field under actual drilling condition and is the theoretical basis for faster and more efficient drilling.

Key words: bottom-hole differential pressure, in-situ stress, pore pressure, fluid-solid coupling, stress field, rock breaking mechanism

中图分类号: 

  • TE 21
[1] 程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[2] 刘波, 马永君, 盛海龙, 常雅儒, 于俊杰, 贾帅龙, . 白垩系红砂岩冻结融化后的力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 161-171.
[3] 王川婴, 王益腾, 韩增强, 汪进超, 邹先坚, 胡胜, . 基于钻孔形态分析的地应力测量方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 549-556.
[4] 陈卫忠, 田 云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[5] 邓 珂, 陈 明, 卢文波, 严 鹏, 冷振东, . 地应力对坝肩槽预裂爆破成缝的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1121-1128.
[6] 谷建晓, 杨钧岩, 王勇, 吕海波, . 基于南水模型的钙质砂应力−应变关系模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4597-4606.
[7] 冷伍明, 张期树, 徐方, 聂如松, 杨奇, 艾希, . 新型预应力路基坡面法向附加应力扩散规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3987-4000.
[8] 崔光耀, 祁家所, 王明胜, . 片理化玄武岩隧道围岩大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 231-237.
[9] 刘阳辉, 胡向东, . 卸载状态下立井冻结壁的力学分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 344-350.
[10] 肖晓春, 丁 鑫, 潘一山, 吕祥锋, 吴 迪, 王 磊, 樊玉峰, . 含瓦斯煤岩真三轴多参量试验系统研制及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 451-462.
[11] 颜天佑,崔 臻,张勇慧,张传健,盛 谦,李建贺,. 跨活动断裂隧洞工程赋存区域地应力场分布特征研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 378-386.
[12] 陈 钒,吴建勋,任 松,欧阳汛,王 亮,范金洋,. 基于湿度应力场理论的硬石膏岩膨胀试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2723-2731.
[13] 王庆武,巨能攀,杜玲丽,黄 健,胡 勇,. 拉林铁路桑日至加查段三维地应力场反演分析[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1450-1462.
[14] 刘飞跃,杨天鸿,张鹏海,周靖人,邓文学,侯宪港,赵永川, . 基于声发射的岩石破裂应力场动态反演[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1517-1524.
[15] 张建海,王仁坤,周 钟,郑 路,张 茹,谢和平, . 高地应力地下厂房预应力锚索预紧系数[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1002-1008.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘小文,常立君,胡小荣. 非饱和红土基质吸力与含水率及密度关系试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3302 -3306 .
[2] 黄建华,宋二祥. 大型锚碇基础围护工程冻结帷幕力学性态研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3372 -3378 .
[3] 王朝阳,许 强,倪万魁. 原状黄土CT试验中应力-应变关系的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 387 -391 .
[4] 万少石,年廷凯,蒋景彩,栾茂田. 边坡稳定强度折减有限元分析中的若干问题讨论[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2283 -2288 .
[5] 闫 铁,李 玮,毕雪亮. 基于分形方法的多孔介质有效应力模型研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2625 -2629 .
[6] 赵尚毅,郑颖人,李安洪,邱文平,唐晓松,徐 俊. 多排埋入式抗滑桩在武隆县政府滑坡中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 160 -164 .
[7] 刘振平,贺怀建,朱发华. 基于钻孔数据的三维可视化快速建模技术的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 260 -266 .
[8] 魏厚振,颜荣涛,韦昌富,吴二林,陈 盼,田慧会. 含天然气水合物沉积物相平衡问题研究综述[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2287 -2294 .
[9] 赵跃堂,林家炜,石 磊. 冲击荷载作用下层裂问题研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 122 -126 .
[10] 王国粹,杨 敏. 砂土中水平受荷桩非线性分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 261 -267 .