应力路径对软土应力-应变特性影响试验研究

›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 3249-3257.

应力路径对软土应力-应变特性影响试验研究

陈林靖¹，戴自航¹，刘志伟²

1. 福州大学岩土工程研究所，福州 350002；2. 福建省电力有限公司，福州 350003

收稿日期:2010-04-27 出版日期:2011-11-01 发布日期:2011-11-09
作者简介:陈林靖，女，1983年生，博士，讲师，主要从事基坑支护方面的研究工作
基金资助:
福建省自然科学基金重点资助项目(No. D0720001)；福州大学科研启动基金资助项目(No. 022279)

Experimental study of stress path of soft soils in influence range of foundation pit

CHEN Lin-jing¹，DAI Zi-hang¹，LIU Zhi-wei²

1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350002, China; 2. Fujian Electric Power Company Limited, Fuzhou 350003, China

Received:2010-04-27 Online:2011-11-01 Published:2011-11-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用应力-应变控制式三轴仪对福州市区某基坑影响范围内典型饱和软土进行了一系列应力路径试验，以研究受基坑开挖和支护结构作用影响的土体卸、加载应力-应变特征。对室内正常固结和相同围压K0固结的试样剪切试验结果进行了比较，表明二者在变形和强度上均存在较大差异。基于K0固结剪切试验结果，求出了邓肯-张模型参数，提出了该模型各参数的验证方法。同时，与室内正常固结试验确定的模型参数进行了对比，说明部分参数之间存在着较大差异，也决定了二者应力-应变关系上的差异，建议以K0固结试样进行三轴加、卸载试验确定邓肯-张模型参数，以满足该模型在基坑工程数值模拟分析中的需要。试验得到的典型软土的邓肯-张模型参数，可供福州市区或相似地层条件下基坑工程数值模拟时参考

关键词: 软土, 应力路径, 应力-应变, K0固结, 邓肯-张模型

Abstract: A series of stress path tests on typical soft soils (silt and organic silty clay) in the influence range of foundation pit in Fuzhou city were conducted by using triaxial apparatus with stress and strain control in order to research the stress-strain behaviours of unloading and loading caused by excavation and retaining structure of foundation pit. Compared with the results of triaxial tests between normal consolidation and K0 consolidation samples in the same confining pressure, it is indicated that there are large differences in deformation and strength. Based on the results of K0 consolidated triaxial tests, Duncan-Chang parameters were figured out and the methods of certification of each parameter in the model were put forward. At the same time, comparison with model parameters obtained by normal consolidation samples showed that some parameters had significant difference; and they decided the difference of stress-strain relationship. Duncan-Chang model parameters were suggested to obtained through triaxial loading and unloading test by K0 consolidation samples for the sake of satisfying numerical simulation analysis of foundation pit engineering. Duncan-Chang parameters of typical soft soils offered by the tests can be referred to numerical simulation of foundation pit engineering in Fuzhou city or other similar strata sites.

Key words: soft soil, stress path, stress-strain, K0 consolidation, Duncan-Chang model

中图分类号:

TU 473

陈林靖，戴自航，刘志伟. 应力路径对软土应力-应变特性影响试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(11): 3249-3257.

CHEN Lin-jing ，DAI Zi-hang ，LIU Zhi-wei. Experimental study of stress path of soft soils in influence range of foundation pit[J]. , 2011, 32(11): 3249-3257.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[2]	贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[3]	张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[4]	叶观宝, 郑文强, 张振, . 大面积填土场地中摩擦型桩负摩阻力分布特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 440-448.
[5]	雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[6]	孔亮, 刘文卓, 袁庆盟, 董彤, . 常剪应力路径下含气砂土的三轴试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3319-3326.
[7]	马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 多孔隙岩石加卸载力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2673-2685.
[8]	孔宪京, 宁凡伟, 刘京茂, 邹德高, 周晨光, . 应力路径和干湿状态对堆石料颗粒破碎的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2059-2065.
[9]	龚文惠, 赵旭东, 邱金伟, 李逸, 杨晗. 饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[10]	张奎, 赵成刚, 李伟华. 海底软土层对海洋地基场地动力响应的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2456-2468.
[11]	蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹, 郑俊杰, 周洋, 闫婧, 李展毅. 饱和软土大变形非线性自重固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[12]	李修磊, 李金凤, 施建勇, . 考虑纤维加筋作用的城市生活垃圾土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1916-1924.
[13]	王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
[14]	刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 李学彬, 张建俊, 任昆, . 部分排水时饱和粉质黏土变围压循环三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1413-1419.
[15]	李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 考虑卸荷速率的K0固结膨胀土应力-应变行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1299-1306.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed