盐岩地下储库围岩界面变形与破损特性分析

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 1621-1628.

盐岩地下储库围岩界面变形与破损特性分析

刘伟¹，李银平¹，霍永胜²，施锡林¹，徐宝财³，杨春和¹，林永杰¹

1.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室，武汉 430071；2.中国石油西气东输管道公司，江苏常州 213251； 3.中国石油西气东输管道公司储气库项目部，江苏镇江 212300

收稿日期:2012-08-02 出版日期:2013-06-10 发布日期:2013-06-14
作者简介:刘伟，男，1986年生，博士研究生，主要从事层状岩体力学特性的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）（No. 2009CB724602，No. 2009CB724603）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（No. 51274187）；“十二五”国家科技重大专项（No. 2011ZX05005-006）

Analysis of deformation and fracture characteristics of wall rock interface of underground storage caverns in salt rock formation

LIU Wei¹, LI Yin-ping¹, HUO Yong-sheng², SHI Xi-lin¹, XU Bao-cai³, YANG Chun-he¹, LIN Yong-jie¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; 2. West-East Gas Pipeline Company, Petro China Company Limited, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213251, China; 3. West-to-East Gas Pipeline Company Gas Storage Project Department, Petro China Company Limited, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212300, China

Received:2012-08-02 Online:2013-06-10 Published:2013-06-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 鉴于盐岩地下储库界面对储气（油）库稳定性和密闭性的重要影响，分别从细观和宏观方面对其变形与破损特性开展研究。细观方面：开展含界面盐岩的电镜扫描试验，分析表明：盐岩与夹层界面处颗粒结合紧密、相互嵌合，胶结良好，为储库密闭性提供有利条件。宏观方面：基于复合岩体理论构建层状盐岩交接界面的应力表达式，进而分析界面的变形及破损特性。分析表明，界面附近应力状态极为复杂，硬夹层对盐岩体具有约束锚固作用，且界面处易产生应力集中，进而诱发储库围岩体裂纹扩展直至破坏。综合细观、宏观分析表明，裂纹起裂机制和渗透通道形成是界面的细观结构特性及其应力状态共同影响的结果。研究成果为进一步分析地下盐岩储库的稳定性和密闭性提供一定参考。

关键词: 层状盐岩, 界面, 电镜扫描, 应力集中, 起裂机制, 渗透通道

Abstract: For the significant influence of the interface between salt rock and interlayer on the stability and tightness of gas (oil) storage caverns in bedded salt rock, related research of meso and macro-aspects on the fracture properties of the interface has been launched. On meso-aspects, scanning electron microscope(SEM) has been carried out; and the results reveal that the grains embedded with each other very tightly so the cementation near the interface is good; it supplies advantageous guarantee for the tightness of the caverns. On macro-aspect, based on the mechanical theory of composite laminated rocks, the expressions of stresses near the interface of bedded salt rock have been established; and the characteristics of deformation and fracture of interlayer have also been analyzed. The research above indicates that the stress state of the interface is very complex. The anchoring effect of hard interlayer exerting to salt rock has been indicated; and the research also reveals that the stress concentration tends to occur near the interface between hard interlayer and salt rock. Combining the aspects of meso and macro together, the research shows that the mechanism of fracture initiation and propagation, and the formation of percolation paths, are induced by both the meso-structure properties and the macro stress state of the interface. The analysis provides some references for further study of the stability and tightness of storage caverns in bedded rock salt.

Key words: bedded salt rocks, interface, SEM, stress concentration, fracture initiation mechanism, percolation paths

中图分类号:

TU 452

刘伟、李银平、霍永胜、施锡林、徐宝财、杨春和、林永杰、. 盐岩地下储库围岩界面变形与破损特性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1621-1628.

LIU Wei、 LI Yin-ping、 HUO Yong-sheng、 SHI Xi-lin、 XU Bao-cai、 YANG Chun-he、 LIN Yong-jie、. Analysis of deformation and fracture characteristics of wall rock interface of underground storage caverns in salt rock formation[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1621-1628.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	芮圣洁, 国振, 王立忠, 周文杰, 李雨杰, . 钙质砂与钢界面循环剪切刚度与阻尼比的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 78-86.
[2]	何鹏飞, 马巍, 穆彦虎, 黄永庭, 董建华, . 黄土−砂浆块界面剪切特性试验及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 82-90.
[3]	雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[4]	丑亚玲, 黄守洋, 孙丽源, 王莉杰, 岳国栋, 曹伟, 盛煜, . 基于冻融作用的氯盐渍土−钢块界面力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 41-52.
[5]	周翠英, 黄思宇, 刘镇, 陆仪启, . 红层软岩软化的界面过程及其动力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3189-3196.
[6]	冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[7]	刘中宪, 王治坤, 梁建文, 王楚楚, . 基于球面波势函数基本解方法的弹性波三维散射与动应力求解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2730-2738.
[8]	李桐, 冯夏庭, 王睿, 肖亚勋, 王勇, 丰光亮, 姚志宾, 牛文静, . 深埋隧道岩爆位置偏转及其微震活动特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2847-2854.
[9]	言志信, 龙哲, 屈文瑞, 张森, 江平, . 地震作用下含软弱层岩体边坡锚固界面剪切作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2882-2890.
[10]	张景科, 单婷婷, 王玉超, 王南, 樊孟, 赵林毅, . 土遗址锚固土体-浆体（CGN+C）界面力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 903-912.
[11]	江强强, 刘路路, 焦玉勇, 王浩, . 干湿循环下滑带土强度特性与微观结构试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1005-1012.
[12]	董建勋, 刘海笑, 李洲. 适用于砂土循环加载分析的边界面塑性模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 684-692.
[13]	刘琦, 漆采玲, 马雯波, 胡聪, 李锋, . 深海底质土-金属界面间黏附特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 701-708.
[14]	陈建功, 陈晓东, . 基于小波函数的锚杆拉拔全过程分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4590-4596.
[15]	高源, 刘海笑, 李洲, . 适用于饱和砂土循环动力分析边界面塑性模型的显式积分算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3951-3958.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed