›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 491-495.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

大断面浅埋黄土隧道锚杆作用效果的试验研究

谭忠盛1,喻 渝2,王明年3,杨建民2   

  1. 1. 北京交通大学 土建学院,北京 10004;2. 铁道第二勘察设计院,成都 610031;3.西南交通大学,成都 450000
  • 收稿日期:2007-09-15 出版日期:2008-02-11 发布日期:2013-07-10
  • 作者简介:谭忠盛,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博导,主要从事隧道及地下工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    铁道部重大科技研发计划资助项目(No. 2005K001–D(G)–2)

Experimental study on bolt effect on large section shallow depth loess tunnels

TAN Zhong-sheng1, YU Yu2, WANG Ming-nian3, YANG Jian-min2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Beijing Jiaotong University,Beijing 100044,China; 2. The Second Survey and Design Institute of China Railway, Chengdu 610031, China; 3. Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031,China
  • Received:2007-09-15 Online:2008-02-11 Published:2013-07-10

摘要: 黄土隧道系统锚杆的作用效果问题一直是争论的焦点。结合正在修建的郑州—西安铁路客运专线大断面黄土隧道,采用现场对比试验方法对系统锚杆作用效果进行研究。为了使试验结果有可比性,选取试验条件基本相同的贺家庄隧道洞身段作为试验段,分别设置有系统锚杆段40 m和无系统锚杆段40 m。对比试验的内容包括:拱顶下沉、拱脚下沉、水平收敛、围岩压力、初支钢架应力、锚杆轴力等。试验结果表明,有系统锚杆段比无系统锚杆段的拱顶沉降大40 %左右、水平收敛大25 %左右,两者的土压力和钢架应力相差不大;锚杆轴力较小,且拱部受压。经综合分析认为,拱部锚杆的支护效果不明显,取消拱部锚杆可减少施工工序,加快隧道初期支护断面及早封闭,能更好地控制支护沉降与变形,并节约工程投资。

关键词: 大断面隧道, 黄土隧道, 锚杆, 对比试验

Abstract: It has been a focus of debate for a long time how the system bolts act on the loess tunnel. Associating with the large section loess tunnel of the building Zhengzhou-Xi’an high-speed passenger rail lines, we have done many in site contrast testing to evaluate the effect of system bolt. For the good comparability of the testing result, we’d choose the tunnel which has the similar test condition. In this case, we take the Hejiazhang Tunnel as our experimental section in which we set system bolt section and non-system bolt section both for 40 meters. The main contrast experiences are the settlement of the tunnel crown and arch foot, horizontal convergence, surrounding rock pressure, the stress of initial supporting steel framework, axial force of bolt, etc. The testing results indicate: the section with system bolt has more 40% of the settlement in the tunnel crown and more 25 % horizontal convergence than the one without system bolt; there are little difference in the soil pressure and steel framework stress between the two sections; there is less axial force in the bolt and the part of arch is pressed. Through comprehensive analysis, we make the conclusion that there is little improvement of supporting effect in the crown bolt, so we suggest canceling the bolt to induce the construction procedure and quicken the enclosed of the initial supporting section of the tunnel. It will be helpful to control the supporting settlement and deformation and it also reduces the investment cost.

Key words: large cross section tunnel, tunnel in loess, bolt, contrast testing

中图分类号: 

  • U 459
[1] 吴秋红, 赵伏军, 王世鸣, 周志华, 王 斌, 李 玉, . 动力扰动下全长黏结锚杆的力学响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 942-950.
[2] 胡帅伟, 陈士海, . 爆破振动下围岩支护锚杆动力响应解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 281-287.
[3] 刘 钟, 张楚福, 张 义, 吕美东, 许国平, 陈天雄, . 囊式扩体锚杆在宁波地区的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 295-301.
[4] 谷拴成,周 攀,黄荣宾. 锚杆–围岩承载结构支护下隧洞稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 122-130.
[5] 崔国建,张传庆,刘立鹏,周 辉,程广坦,. 锚杆杆体–砂浆界面力学特性的剪切速率效应研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 275-281.
[6] 周 勇,王旭日,朱彦鹏,李京榜,蒋小奎,. 强风化软硬互层岩质高边坡监测与数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2249-2258.
[7] 陈文强,赵宇飞,周纪军,. 考虑受压侧岩体反力非线性作用的锚杆抗剪理论[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1662-1668.
[8] 赵象卓,张宏伟,CAO Chen,张 明,张怀东,韩 军, . 不同围岩条件下锚杆肋间距与锚固力优化研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1263-1270.
[9] 黄明华,赵明华,陈昌富. 锚固长度对锚杆受力影响分析及其临界值计算[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4033-4041.
[10] 张妹珠,江 权,王雪亮,冯夏庭,钟 山,刘 畅, . 破裂大理岩锚注加固试样的三轴压缩试验及加固机制分析[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3651-3660.
[11] 白晓宇,张明义,匡 政,王永洪,闫 楠,朱 磊,. 光纤光栅传感技术在GFRP抗浮锚杆现场拉拔试验中的应用[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3891-3899.
[12] 贾金青,高军程,涂兵雄,张 磊,王海涛,高仁哲,. 深基坑中压力型预应力锚杆柔性支护结构的离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 304-310.
[13] 刘泉声, 雷广峰, 彭星新, 魏 莱, 刘建平, 潘玉丛,. 锚杆锚固对节理岩体剪切性能影响试验研究及机制分析[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 27-35.
[14] 孙加平,顾厚煜,胡国保,温树杰,. 锚杆作用下边坡稳定分析中改进最小势能法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 291-298.
[15] 李怀珍,李学华,. 基于界面滑移脱黏的锚杆合理锚固长度研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3106-3112.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘小文,常立君,胡小荣. 非饱和红土基质吸力与含水率及密度关系试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3302 -3306 .
[2] 黄建华,宋二祥. 大型锚碇基础围护工程冻结帷幕力学性态研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3372 -3378 .
[3] 王观石,李长洪,陈保君,李世海. 应力波在非线性结构面介质中的传播规律[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3747 -3752 .
[4] 杨利国,骆亚生,李 焱,王志杰. 初始应力条件对压实黄土动强度影响的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 87 -91 .
[5] 王朝阳,许 强,倪万魁. 原状黄土CT试验中应力-应变关系的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 387 -391 .
[6] 万少石,年廷凯,蒋景彩,栾茂田. 边坡稳定强度折减有限元分析中的若干问题讨论[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2283 -2288 .
[7] 刘泉声,胡云华,刘 滨. 基于试验的花岗岩渐进破坏本构模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 289 -296 .
[8] 金志仁,何继善. 基于距离判别分析方法的深基坑支护方案优选研究[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2423 -2430 .
[9] 王国波,马险峰,杨林德. 软土地铁车站结构及隧道的三维地震响应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2523 -2528 .
[10] 徐维生,柴军瑞,陈兴周,孙旭曙. 岩体裂隙网络非线性非立方渗流研究与应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 53 -57 .