›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 1662-1668.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.1273

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑受压侧岩体反力非线性作用的锚杆抗剪理论

陈文强1,赵宇飞2,周纪军3   

  1. 1. 天津理工大学 管理学院,天津 300384;2. 中国水利水电科学研究院 岩土工程研究所,北京 100048; 3. 中车建设工程有限责任公司,北京 100078
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-01 出版日期:2018-05-11 发布日期:2018-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 赵宇飞,男,1979年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土力学特性和数值分析方面的研究工作。E-mail: zhaoyf@iwhr.com E-mail:wenqiang205@163.com
  • 作者简介:陈文强,男,1986年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土工程、灾害管理方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 51409283)

Shear resistance theory of bolt considering nonlinear behaviour of grout reaction force

CHEN Wen-qiang1, ZHAO Yu-fei2, ZHOU Ji-jun3   

  1. 1. School of Management, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China; 2. Geotechnical Engineering Department, China Institution of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100048, China; 3. CNR Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100078, China
  • Received:2016-06-01 Online:2018-05-11 Published:2018-06-12
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51409283).

摘要: 针对锚杆受压侧岩体或砂浆体反力非线性作用及结构面的剪胀效应问题,基于经典梁理论推导锚杆轴力与轴向变形及横向剪切力与横向变形的理论公式,建立了锚杆抗剪力计算公式。通过加锚结构面直剪试验验证理论计算有效性,并分析结构面剪胀系数、围岩强度、锚杆安装角(倾角)对锚杆变形和抗剪力的影响。结果表明:锚杆抗剪理论计算与室内试验结果吻合较好;结构面剪胀系数越大,越能较快调动锚杆抗剪作用,相反锚杆塑性强化特征越不明显,改善加锚结构面的阻滑抗剪作用,主要依靠结构面固有抗剪强度;随着围岩强度降低,锚杆需经一定变形才能发挥较大抗剪作用,而随着围岩强度增大,锚杆将迅速达到屈服状态,并且锚杆由轴向张拉破坏逐渐转为拉剪破坏;锚杆最优安装角随结构面内摩擦角增大而增大,依据实际工程中结构面内摩擦角取值范围,可估算锚杆最优安装角为30°~68°。

关键词: 锚杆, 岩体反力, 抗剪力, 轴向力, 横向剪切力

Abstract: This study aims to solve the problems on the nonlinear behaviour of rock mass or mortar against the pressure side of the bolt and the dilatancy effect of the structural surface. Theoretical formulas for the axial force and axial deformation, transverse shear force and transverse deformation of anchor bolts were derived, and the formula for the shear resistance of anchor bolts was also established based on the classical beam theory. The validity of the theoretical solutions was verified by the direct shear test on bolted structures. Furthermore, this study performed the effects of joint dilatancy coefficient, joint friction angle, surrounding rock strength and bolt installation angle on the deformation and shear resistance of anchor rods. The results showed that the theoretical calculation results were in good agreement with the experimental results. The higher dilatancy coefficient led to the higher shear resistance of the bolt, but less significant of plastic behaviour. Thus, the shear resistance of bolted joint can be improved by the inherent shear strength of the structural surface. When the strength of surrounding rock decreased, the anchor bolt had to undergo specific deformation to exert a large shearing effect. The higher strength of rock resulted in the yield failure of the bolt within a shorter time, and the damage of the anchor bolt was gradually transformed from the axial tensile failure into tensile shear failure. The optimal installation angle of the bolt increased with the increase of the internal friction angle of the structure. The optimal installation angle of the bolt was estimated within the angle ranging from 30° to 68° in working joint conditions.

Key words: cable bolt, grout reaction force, shear resistance, axial force, transverse shear force

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470

[1] 韩冬冬, 门玉明, 胡兆江. 土质滑坡格构锚杆抗滑机制及受力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1189-1194.
[2] 芦苇, 赵冬, 李东波, 毛筱霏. 土遗址全长黏结式锚固系统动力响应解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[3] 杨学祥, 焦园发, 杨语驿, . 充气膨胀控制锚杆的研制与试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[4] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[5] 冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[6] 言志信, 龙哲, 屈文瑞, 张森, 江平, . 地震作用下含软弱层岩体边坡锚固 界面剪切作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2882-2890.
[7] 吴秋红, 赵伏军, 王世鸣, 周志华, 王 斌, 李 玉, . 动力扰动下全长黏结锚杆的力学响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 942-950.
[8] 陈建功, 陈晓东, . 基于小波函数的锚杆拉拔全过程分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4590-4596.
[9] 冯君, 王洋, 张俞峰, 黄林, 何长江, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维与钢筋锚杆锚固性能现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[10] 叶帅华, 赵壮福, 朱彦鹏, . 框架锚杆支护黄土边坡大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4240-4248.
[11] 丁潇, 谷拴成, 何晖, 张玉, . 单/多离层作用下锚杆受力特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4299-4305.
[12] 王小伟, 朱杰兵, 李聪, . pH和O2协同作用下预应力锚杆 腐蚀损伤行为试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4306-4312.
[13] 胡帅伟, 陈士海, . 爆破振动下围岩支护锚杆动力响应解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 281-287.
[14] 刘 钟, 张楚福, 张 义, 吕美东, 许国平, 陈天雄, . 囊式扩体锚杆在宁波地区的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 295-301.
[15] 谷拴成,周 攀,黄荣宾. 锚杆–围岩承载结构支护下隧洞稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 122-130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!