岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 4299-4305.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2005

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

单/多离层作用下锚杆受力特性分析

丁 潇1,谷拴成2,何晖1,张 玉1   

  1. 1. 西安工业大学 建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710021;2. 西安科技大学 建筑与土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710054
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-30 出版日期:2019-11-11 发布日期:2019-11-13
  • 作者简介:丁潇,女,1988年生,博士研究生,讲师,主要从事岩土加固理论与技术的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学青年基金项目(No.11802218);陕西省科技计划项目(No.2019JQ-432,No.2019JQ-835);陕西省教育厅专项科研计划项目((No.19JK0399);陕西省黄土力学与工程重点实验室项目(No.LME201801)

Force characteristic analysis of bolt under single and multiple bed separation

DING Xiao1, GU Shuan-cheng2, HE Hui1, ZHANG Yu1   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710021, China; 2. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China
  • Received:2018-10-30 Online:2019-11-11 Published:2019-11-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Young Foundations of the National Natural Science of China (11802218), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Shaanxi Province(2019JQ-432, 2019JQ-835), the Special Scientific Research Plan of Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (No. 19JK0399) and Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Loess Mechanics and Engineering(LME201801) .

摘要: 巷道围岩由于变形的不协调常常会产生单个或多个离层。根据岩层相对移动时拉拔载荷对锚杆的作用机制,对单个离层产生的锚杆附加应力建立弹塑性力学模型,讨论了弹性状态下离层对锚固体荷载的影响,随着离层进一步扩展,锚固体界面进入弹塑性阶段,基于剪切滑移模型,确定出离层左右两侧的滑移范围。总结出离层作用下锚杆受力全过程分为5个阶段:全弹性、单侧弹塑性、两侧弹塑性、一侧全滑移而另一侧滑移范围增大、全塑性直至锚杆承受极限拉拔荷载而破坏。采用模型试验数据对岩体离层-锚杆轴力曲线特性进行对比验证,结果表明,计算值与实测值吻合较好。根据应力叠加原理,推导出多离层情况下锚杆的应力求解公式,得出应力分布为多峰曲线。通过实例对离层值、离层位置做了参数分析,离层对锚杆的荷载影响应在今后的锚固设计中予以考虑。

关键词: 单离层, 多离层, 锚杆, 弹塑性力学模型, 受力特性

Abstract: The roadway surrounding rock often produces single or multiple bed separation due to deformation incoordination. Based on the mechanism of bolt pullout force during the relative movement to the strata, an elastic-plastic mechanics model of additional stress occurred by bed separation was established. The influence of bolt loading caused by bed separation in elastic state was firstly discussed. The interface of anchorage body will enter elastic-plastic stage under further expansion of bed separation. The sliding ranges on both sides of the bed separation were determined through the two-stage linear function shear slide model. Loading process of the anchorage body under the bed separation function was divided into four general stages, which included elastic stage, one side elastic-plastic stage, two sides elastic-plastic stage, one side sliding further with one side sliding all stage, and both sides sliding all stage. The axial force distribution during bed separation was verified by experimental results. The results show that calculated value has good agreement with the measured value. The bolt stress distribution caused by the multiple bed separation was summarized according to the superposition principle. The multiple peak curves of stress distribution were proved. Finally, the parameter analysis of bed separation value location was made through an example. The influence of bed separation on bolt loading should be considered in future anchorage design.

Key words: single bed separation, multiple bed separation, bolt, elastic-plastic mechanical model, force characteristics

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 韩冬冬, 门玉明, 胡兆江. 土质滑坡格构锚杆抗滑机制及受力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1189-1194.
[2] 芦苇, 赵冬, 李东波, 毛筱霏. 土遗址全长黏结式锚固系统动力响应解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[3] 杨学祥, 焦园发, 杨语驿, . 充气膨胀控制锚杆的研制与试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[4] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[5] 冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[6] 言志信, 龙哲, 屈文瑞, 张森, 江平, . 地震作用下含软弱层岩体边坡锚固 界面剪切作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2882-2890.
[7] 吴秋红, 赵伏军, 王世鸣, 周志华, 王 斌, 李 玉, . 动力扰动下全长黏结锚杆的力学响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 942-950.
[8] 陈建功, 陈晓东, . 基于小波函数的锚杆拉拔全过程分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4590-4596.
[9] 冯君, 王洋, 张俞峰, 黄林, 何长江, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维与钢筋锚杆锚固性能现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[10] 叶帅华, 赵壮福, 朱彦鹏, . 框架锚杆支护黄土边坡大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4240-4248.
[11] 王小伟, 朱杰兵, 李聪, . pH和O2协同作用下预应力锚杆 腐蚀损伤行为试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4306-4312.
[12] 胡帅伟, 陈士海, . 爆破振动下围岩支护锚杆动力响应解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 281-287.
[13] 刘 钟, 张楚福, 张 义, 吕美东, 许国平, 陈天雄, . 囊式扩体锚杆在宁波地区的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 295-301.
[14] 谷拴成,周 攀,黄荣宾. 锚杆–围岩承载结构支护下隧洞稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 122-130.
[15] 崔国建,张传庆,刘立鹏,周 辉,程广坦,. 锚杆杆体–砂浆界面力学特性的剪切速率效应研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 275-281.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!