›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 3277-3283.

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

加筋材料动态松弛有限元模型的建立及应用

彭芳乐1, 2,华 针1, 2,曹延波1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2013-05-29 出版日期:2013-11-09 发布日期:2013-11-11
  • 作者简介:彭芳乐,男,1965年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为岩土力学、地下空间与工程等
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51279132);教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划(No. IRT1029)

Finite element modeling of reinforced material based on dynamic relaxation method and its application

PENG Fang-le1, 2,HUA Zhen1, 2,CAO Yan-bo1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2013-05-29 Online:2013-11-09 Published:2013-11-11

摘要: 为分析加筋材料的抗弯刚度对加筋性能的影响,加筋材料采用梁单元形式。基于动态松弛法,通过定义梁单元的刚度矩阵,求解内力矢量,随后定义虚拟质量密度而建立总质量矩阵,将加筋材料的梁单元有限元模型嵌入到已有的动态松弛法求解程序中。通过对简支梁的简单加载模拟验证了该梁单元模型的准确性能。随后,将该有限元模型与已有的动态松弛法计算程序结合(含砂土本构及弱面单元模型),对加筋砂土地基室内模型试验进行了数值模拟。将梁单元的模拟结果与杆单元(梁单元的特例)模拟结果进行了比较,并分别探讨了抗拉刚度和抗弯刚度对加筋砂土地基承载性能的影响。结果表明:抗拉刚度对承载能力的影响较小;抗弯刚度对承载力的影响程度与加筋材料的布置形式有关,特别是当加筋砂土中出现剪切带以后,其影响逐渐增大。因此,在分析加筋砂土结构的增强机制时,建议采用梁单元(具有一定的抗弯刚度)对加筋材料进行模拟。

关键词: 加筋土, 加筋材料, 动态松弛法, 有限元法, 梁单元, 刚度效应

Abstract: To analyze the influence of bending stiffness of reinforcement on the bearing capacity of reinforced soil structures, the beam element form is applied to modeling for reinforcement. Based on the dynamic relaxation (DR) method, the finite element model of beam element simulating reinforcement is presented. Firstly, the beam element stiffness matrix is constructed and the solution to internal force vector is obtained. Then, the fictitious mass density is defined just for numerical purposes and a mass matrix is established. The beam model is embedded in the existing dynamic relaxation calculation program. To validate the performance and accuracy of the beam element model , the loading simulation of simple beam is conducted. Subsequently model, the numerical study for the reinforced sandy ground physical model test is carried out by combining the beam element model and the DR calculation program (including the sand constitutive and the interface models). The comparison of simulation results between the beam element model and bar element model are conducted. The influences of tensile stiffness and bending stiffness on the bearing capacities of reinforced sand foundation are discussed respectively. The simulation results show that the tensile stiffness has little effect on the bearing capacity of the reinforced sand foundation. The influence of bending stiffness on bearing capacity is related to the reinforcement layout; especially when the shear band occurs in the reinforced sand structures, the impact will increase. Thus, to analyze the reinforced mechanism of reinforced sand structures, the beam element is recommended (with bending stiffness) in the simulation procedure.

Key words: reinforced sand, reinforced material, dynamic relaxation method, finite element method(FEM), beam element, stiffness effect

中图分类号: 

  • O 319.56
[1] 曹洪, 胡瑶, 骆冠勇. 滤管两端均不在含水层层面的承压不 完整井近似计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2774-2780.
[2] 赵晓彦, 范宇飞, 刘亮, 蒋楚生, . 铁路台阶式加筋土挡墙潜在破裂面特征模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2108-2118.
[3] 王翔南, 李全明, 于玉贞, 喻葭临, 吕禾, . 基于扩展有限元法对土体滑坡破坏过程的模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2435-2442.
[4] 徐 鹏, 蒋关鲁, 雷 涛, 刘 琪, 王智猛, 刘 勇, . 考虑填土强度的加筋土挡墙动位移计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1841-1846.
[5] 徐 鹏, 蒋关鲁, 王 珣, 黄昊威, 黄 哲, 王智猛, . 面板对加筋土挡墙影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1427-1432.
[6] 徐 鹏, 蒋关鲁, 邱俊杰, 高泽飞, 王智猛, . 整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 998-1004.
[7] 王家全, 张亮亮, 赖 毅, 陆梦梁, 叶 斌, . 加筋土挡墙静动力学特性大模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[8] 郑安兴, 罗先启, 陈振华, . 基于扩展有限元法的岩体水力劈裂耦合模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 799-808.
[9] 王冬勇, 陈曦, 于玉贞, 吕彦楠, . 基于二阶锥规划有限元增量加载法的条形浅基础极限承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4890-4896.
[10] 郑安兴,罗先启,. 危岩水力劈裂分析的扩展有限元法[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3461-3468.
[11] 宋 佳,古 泉,许成顺,杜修力,. 饱和土动力方程全显式有限元法在 OpenSees中的实现与应用[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3477-3485.
[12] 徐 鹏,蒋关鲁,邱俊杰,林展展,王智猛,. 基于二楔块法的加筋土挡墙屈服加速度及破坏模式极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2765-2770.
[13] 梁 程,徐 超, . 土工格室加筋土垫层路堤临界高度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2984-2990.
[14] 宋 佳,杜修力,许成顺,孙宝印,. 饱和土场地-桩基-地上结构体系的地震响应研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3061-3070.
[15] 陈建峰,田 丹,柳军修,. 刚/柔性组合墙面加筋土挡墙内部破坏机制[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2353-2360.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王川婴,胡培良,孙卫春. 基于钻孔摄像技术的岩体完整性评价方法[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1326 -1330 .
[2] 李华明,蒋关鲁,刘先峰. CFG桩加固饱和粉土地基的动力特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1550 -1554 .
[3] 谈云志,孔令伟,郭爱国,万 智. 压实红黏土水分传输的毛细效应与数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2289 -2294 .
[4] 王云岗,熊 凯,凌道盛. 基于平动加转动运动场的边坡稳定上限分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2619 -2624 .
[5] 龙 照,赵明华,张恩祥,刘峻龙. 锚杆临界锚固长度简化计算方法[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2991 -2994 .
[6] 史旦达,周 健,贾敏才,杨永香. 考虑蠕变性状的港区软土地基参数反演和长期沉降预测[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 746 -750 .
[7] 邓宗伟,冷伍明,李志勇,岳志平. 喷混凝土边坡温度场与应力场耦合的有限元时效分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1153 -1158 .
[8] 刘振平,贺怀建,白世伟,张 华,邹 丹,李火兵. 软基中500 kV输电桩板塔基现场试验与数值模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1031 -1039 .
[9] 丁洲祥,仇玉良,李 涛. 双面排水非线性固结超静孔压的非对称性解析[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1829 -1838 .
[10] 田堪良 ,张慧莉 ,马 俊 . 基于强度条件的黄土结构性静力试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 1993 -1999 .