增(减)湿时黄土的湿陷系数曲线特征

›› 2005, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (9): 1363-1368.

增(减)湿时黄土的湿陷系数曲线特征

张茂花¹，谢永利²，刘保健²

1. 东北林业大学土木工程学院, 哈尔滨 150040；2. 长安大学公路学院，西安 710064

收稿日期:2004-04-08 出版日期:2005-09-10 发布日期:2013-12-30
作者简介:张茂花，女，1977年生，博士，讲师，主要从事岩土工程及智能混凝土方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（No. 598780401）。

Characteristics of collapsibility coefficient curves of loess during moistening and demoistening process

ZHANG Mao-hua¹, XIE Yong-li², LIU Bao-jian²

1. School of Civil Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China; 2. School of highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China

Received:2004-04-08 Online:2005-09-10 Published:2013-12-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 分别采用单线法和双线法对原状黄土进行了增、减湿情况下的单轴压缩试验。根据试验结果，总结出了黄土的湿陷变形随饱和度及压力变化的规律，分析了湿陷性黄土在增（减）湿过程中的湿陷变形性状及不同应力路径对黄土湿陷变形特性的影响，指出湿陷系数曲线因为试验方法的不同而表现出不同的规律性：初始含水量较低时，单线法的湿陷性大于双线法；当初始含水量达到某个值时，两者的湿陷系数曲线出现交叉现象；当初始含水量超过该值后，单线法的湿陷性小于双线法；这种交叉现象是由黄土本身的特殊结构性所决定的。最后对湿陷系数与初始含水量的关系进行了探讨。

关键词: 湿陷性黄土, 增(减)湿变形, 湿陷系数曲线, 单线法, 双线法, 原状土, 单轴压缩试验

Abstract: The behavior of undisturbed loess in the case of moistening or demoistening is investigated with single-line and double-line uniaxial compression test. According to the experimental results, the characteristics of collapsible deformation of loess changing with saturation level and pressure are presented. The collapsible deformation properties of loess during moistening or demoistening process and the influence of different stress-paths on collapse deformation characters of loess are analyzed. It is indicated that collapsibility coefficient curves can display different characteristics for different test method. The collapsibility of single-line method is larger than that of double-line method for lower initial moisture content, and is smaller than that of double-line method for higher initial moisture content. For certain value of initial moisture content in between, collapsibility coefficient curves of the two methods will intersect. This intersection phenomenon is caused by special structure of loess. Finally, the relation between collapsibility coefficient and initial moisture content is discussed.

Key words: collapsible loess, moistening or demoistening deformation, collapsibility coefficient curves, single-line method, double- line method, undisturbed loess, uniaxial compression test

中图分类号:

TU 444

张茂花，谢永利，刘保健，. 增(减)湿时黄土的湿陷系数曲线特征[J]. , 2005, 26(9): 1363-1368.

ZHANG Mao-hua , XIE Yong-li , LIU Bao-jian，. Characteristics of collapsibility coefficient curves of loess during moistening and demoistening process[J]. , 2005, 26(9): 1363-1368.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	柯志强, 王环玲, 徐卫亚, 林志南, 吉华, . 含横向节理的柱状节理岩体力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 660-667.
[2]	吴永胜，谭忠盛，余贤斌，喻渝，朱勇,. 不同加载方位角下单轴压缩千枚岩扩容特性[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2747-2754.
[3]	李志刚，徐光黎，黄鹏，赵欣，伏永朋，苏昌，. 粉砂质板岩力学特性及各向异性特性[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1737-1746.
[4]	范成凯，孙艳坤，李琦，鲁海峰，牛智勇，李霞颖,. 页岩单轴压缩破坏试验的光纤布拉格光栅测试技术研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2456-2464.
[5]	安鹏，张爱军，邢义川，倪万魁，张博,. 伊犁深厚湿陷性黄土浸水入渗及沉降变形特征分析[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 557-564.
[6]	牛亚强，王旭，郑静，蒋代军，刘德仁，蒋鹏程 , . 侧向约束防渗路基新结构防渗效果试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 252-258.
[7]	黄雪峰，杨校辉，殷鹤，刘自龙，周俊鹏,. 湿陷性黄土场地湿陷下限深度与桩基中性点位置关系研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 296-302.
[8]	赵明志，罗强，蒋良潍，张良，孟伟超 , . 基于标准压缩模量和液限推求地基土全压力段压缩模量的分析方法[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 2073-2080.
[9]	梅源，胡长明，魏弋峰，张文萃，袁一力，王雪艳 , . Q2、Q3黄土深堑中高填方地基变形规律离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3473-3481.
[10]	王端端，周志军，吕彦达，魏进. 湿陷性黄土中成孔方式对桩基承载力影响试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2927-2933.
[11]	蒋明镜，贺洁 , . 三维离散元单轴试验模拟甲烷水合物宏观三轴强度特性[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2692-2701.
[12]	王章琼，晏鄂川，刘毅学，王忠杰，. 武当群片岩变形参数各向异性特征及机制研究[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1317-1322.
[13]	姚志华，黄雪峰 , 陈正汉，方祥位，苗强强，张江水，. 关于黄土湿陷性评价和剩余湿陷量的新认识[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 998-1006.
[14]	孙旭曙，李建林，王乐华，陈兴周，李飞，程冬，. 节理岩体超声测试及单轴压缩试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3473-3478.
[15]	邵生俊，杨春鸣，马秀婷，陆斯. 黄土的独立物性指标及其与湿陷性参数的相关性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 27-34.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed