软基真空预压加固的注气增效机制与数值分析

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (S2): 600-606.

软基真空预压加固的注气增效机制与数值分析

屠红珍¹，徐衍徽²，谢立全²

1. 温州市港航管理局，浙江温州 325088；2. 同济大学土木工程学院，上海 200092

收稿日期:2014-05-15 出版日期:2014-10-31 发布日期:2014-11-12
通讯作者: 谢立全，男，1972年生，副教授，博士生导师，主要从事近海、海洋岩土工程及深水建筑物安全防护研究。E-mail: xie_liquan@tongji.edu.cn E-mail:mzh2672@126.com
作者简介:屠红珍，女，1973年生，高级工程师，硕士，主要从事港口、海岸工程研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（No. 11172213）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目（基础研究人才培养计划20123106）。

Mechanism and numerical analysis of effect of air injection on vacuum preloading for weak foundation improvement

TU Hong-zhen¹，XU Yan-hui²，XIE Li-quan²

1. Port and Shipping Management Bureau of Wenzhou, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325088, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received:2014-05-15 Online:2014-10-31 Published:2014-11-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 无砂垫层真空预压技术已成功应用于软土地基加固工程，但软土的低透水性致使其工期很长。为此提出联合间歇性注气以改进真空预压技术，提高其排水速率、缩短工期。建立联合注气的真空预压法有限元分析模型，通过注气位置与注气压力的改变，对比分析注气前后土体中渗流速度、排水速率、渗透比降等的变化规律。结果表明，注气能显著提高真空预压法的排水速率，增强真空预压法的加固效果；由于气体的轻质特性，在排水板下方注气更有利于排水效果；在不冲破土层的情况下，注气压力越大，促进加固的效果越好。联合注气能有效增强真空预压加固软土地基的排水效率，有着较好的工程应用前景。

关键词: 真空预压, 工期, 间歇性注气, 软基处理

Abstract: Vacuum preloading technique without sand cushion layer has been successfully applied to the weak foundation reinforcement; but it is difficult to shorten construction period due to the low permeability of weak soil. Intermittent air injection is proposed to increase the drainage rate for vacuum drainage. The combined method of vacuum preloading and air injection is investigated for different conditions of the injecting positions and air pressures based on finite element simulation. Seepage velocity, drainage rate and seepage gradient are compared and analyzed before and after air injection. The simulation results show that the air injection can improve the efficiency of vacuum drainage, so as to enhance the foundation reinforcement and reduce preloading time of the vacuum loading. The efficiency of injecting air below the drain boards is better than that above the bottom ends of boards. And in the case of not breaking through the foundation in the air injection, the greater the air pressure is set, the better effect of reinforcement will be. The combined method of vacuum preloading and air injection could be widely used in the improvement practice of weak ground.

Key words: vacuum preloading, construction period, intermittent air injection, weak foundation improvement

中图分类号:

TU 755.6+2

屠红珍，徐衍徽，谢立全，. 软基真空预压加固的注气增效机制与数值分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 600-606.

TU Hong-zhen ，XU Yan-hui ，XIE Li-quan，. Mechanism and numerical analysis of effect of air injection on vacuum preloading for weak foundation improvement[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 600-606.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	史吏, 胡东东, 蔡袁强, 潘晓东, 孙宏磊, . 增压式真空预压吹填淤泥孔压实时响应及加固机制初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 185-193.
[2]	雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[3]	张玉国, 万东阳, 郑言林, 韩帅, 杨晗玥, 段萌萌. 考虑径向渗透系数变化的真空预压竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3533-3541.
[4]	杨爱武, 潘亚轩, 曹宇, 尚英杰, 吴可龙, . 吹填软土低位真空预压室内试验及其数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 539-548.
[5]	董志宏, 钮新强, 丁秀丽, 翁永红, 黄书岭, 裴启涛, 张练, . 乌东德左岸地下厂房洞室群施工期围岩变形特征及反馈分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 326-336.
[6]	柳晓科，鹿群，路士伟，刘春龙，郭少龙,. 低裙式吸力桩真空沉贯及抗拔极限承载力[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2089-2098.
[7]	黄朝煊，王正中，方咏来,. 考虑漏气及井阻非线性的真空预压地基固结解析解[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2574-2582.
[8]	刘勇，戚蓝，李少明，郭浩洋，. 考虑变井阻和涂抹效应的真空预压三维有限元分析[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1517-1523.
[9]	武亚军，牛坤，唐海峰，胡志刚，陆逸天，. 药剂真空预压法处理工程废浆中生石灰的增渗作用[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3453-3461.
[10]	鲍树峰，娄炎，董志良，牛飞，谢荣星, . 负压环境下新型地下水位测试装置研发[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3067-3073.
[11]	冯帆，邱信蛟，张国新，管俊峰，王丹，. 基于施工期变形监测的特高拱坝力学参数反演研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 237-246.
[12]	沈扬，王保光，陶明安，王鑫，杜文汉，. 重塑黏土空心圆柱试样制备技术改进及应用[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 697-701.
[13]	鲍树峰，董志良，莫海鸿，武冬青,. 高黏粒含量新吹填淤泥加固新技术室内研发[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 61-67.
[14]	乐超，徐超，吴雪峰，金亚伟，. 两种塑料排水板滤膜淤堵特性试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2529-2534.
[15]	温森，贺东青，杨圣奇，. 隧洞变形引起的TBM施工事故综合风险分析[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1727-1734.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed