真空联合堆载预压加固含承压水软基中水位和出水量变化规律研究

›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (S1): 961-964.

真空联合堆载预压加固含承压水软基中水位和出水量变化规律研究

金小荣¹，俞建霖¹，龚晓南¹，毛志兴²

1. 浙江大学岩土工程研究所，杭州 310027；2. 浙江省电力公司，杭州 310007

收稿日期:2006-07-10 发布日期:2006-12-15
作者简介:金小荣，男，1977年生，博士研究生，主要从事基坑工程和地基处理方面研究。

Study on groundwater table and water flux of soft soil with confined water by vacuum-surcharge preloading

JIN Xiao-rong¹, YU Jian-lin¹, GONG Xiao-nan¹, MAO Zhi-xing²

1.Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China; 2.Zhejiang Provincial Electric Power Company, Hangzhou 310007, China

Received:2006-07-10 Published:2006-12-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对含承压水地层的真空联合堆载预压地下水位和出水量变化进行了分析和研究。现场测试结果表明，（1）撕膜和非撕膜的塑排板施工工艺能有效防止承压水贯通，真空联合堆载预压加固软基效果较为明显；（2）联合预压期间地下水位相对稳定，最大水位下降值为1.8 m，工程后期SW2水位上升约1.0 m，说明加固区局部已贯通承压水层；（3）加固区内外承压水水位变化具有类似的规律，加固区内外水位变化分别受真空度分布和降雨的影响；（4）抽真空初期出水量较大，随着抽真空时间增加出水量迅速减小，在工程后期单泵出水量小于同一地区相同工法加固深厚软基的单泵出水量，说明研究区真空联合堆载预压并未完全贯通承压水地层。

关键词: 承压水, 真空联合堆载, 地下水位, 出水量

Abstract: The variations of groundwater table and water flux are analyzed and studied in soft soil with confined water stratum by vacuum-surcharge preloading. The field test results indicate: (1) technology of ‘tearing membrane’ and ‘non-tearing membrane’ could effectively prevent the connectivity of confined water; (2) groundwater table at later stage is quite stable and the maximum dropping is 1.8 meter, SW2 arises about 1.0m, which indicates this area is partially penetrated by confined water; (3) confined water table at inward and outward is quite similar, they are separately influenced by degree of vacuum and rainfall; (4) water flux is very large at early stage, which diminishes sharply with time, and water flux of single vacuum pump is less than the one at the same zone by the same method, which indicates soft soil never completely connect the confined water stratum by vacuum-surcharge preloading.

Key words: confined water, vacuum-surcharge preloading, groundwater table, water flux

中图分类号:

TU 447

金小荣，俞建霖，龚晓南，毛志兴,. 真空联合堆载预压加固含承压水软基中水位和出水量变化规律研究[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 961-964.

JIN Xiao-rong , YU Jian-lin , GONG Xiao-nan , MAO Zhi-xing,. Study on groundwater table and water flux of soft soil with confined water by vacuum-surcharge preloading [J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 961-964.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	郑刚, 栗晴瀚, 哈达, 程雪松, . 天津市承压层应力状态及减压引发沉降规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 285-294.
[2]	马凯，尹立明，陈军涛，陈明，王自起，崔博强,. 深部开采底板隔水关键层受局部高承压水作用破坏理论分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3213-3222.
[3]	胡勇，李云安，李波，李从安，肖捷夫,. 承压水位变动下深大基坑空间效应离心试验与数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1999-2007.
[4]	李伟，许强，吴礼舟，李斯琦, . 平推式滑坡中底滑面承压水渗流形式对其稳定性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1401-1410.
[5]	刘路路，宋亮，焦玉勇，王浩，张秀丽，谢壁婷, . 库水位波动条件下黄土坡临江1#崩滑堆积体稳定性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 359-366.
[6]	朱光丽，张文泉，张贵彬，王树立，. 采动诱发断层活化导水试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3163-3172.
[7]	鲍树峰，娄炎，董志良，牛飞，谢荣星, . 负压环境下新型地下水位测试装置研发[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3067-3073.
[8]	贾亚杰，梁发云，崔振东，叶华，. 基于层间位移协调的承压水降压引起土层变形分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 42-48.
[9]	马少坤，邵羽，吕虎，WONG K S ，吴宏伟，陈欣，江杰，. 地下水位循环变化时隧道开挖对群桩的长期影响研究[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1563-1568.
[10]	叶观宝，张晴雯，张振 , . 真空联合堆载预压下混凝土芯砂石桩复合地基固结特性理论分析[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3356-3364.
[11]	张飞，李镜培，孙长安，沈广军，李飞,. 软土狭长深基坑抗隆起破坏模式试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2825-2832.
[12]	郑洪春，邓建辉，胡万雨，崔玉龙，周元辅,. 水库岸坡的承压水模型研究[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 869-876.
[13]	徐长节，徐礼阁，孙凤明，於锦，杨迪,. 深基坑承压水的风险控制及处理实例[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 353-358.
[14]	聂庆科，王英辉，白冰，贾向新，任国家，. 单井点和单排井点布置的真空降水现场试验及比较研究[J]. , 2014, 299(2): 481-489.
[15]	王卫东，翁其平，陈永才 , . 56 m深TRD工法搅拌墙在深厚承压含水层中的成墙试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(11): 3247-3252.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed