›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 694-700.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.03.011

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

液氮冻结对岩石抗拉及抗压强度影响试验研究

黄中伟1,位江巍2,李根生1,蔡承政1   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(北京) 油气资源与探测国家重点试验室,北京,102249;2. 中国石油塔里木油田公司油气工程研究院,新疆 库尔勒,841000
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-01 出版日期:2016-03-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:黄中伟,男,1972年生,博士,教授,主要从事高压水射流技术在石油工程中的理论与应用研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金国际(地区)合作与交流项目“页岩气藏水平井完井与多级压裂增产的基础研究”(No.51210006);国家自然科学基金项目“液氮喷射射孔-压裂可行性试验研究”(No.51374220);教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划” 资助(No.NCET-12-097)。

An experimental study of tensile and compressive strength of rocks under cryogenic nitrogen freezing

HUANG Zhong-wei1, WEI Jiang-wei2, LI Gen-sheng1, CAI Cheng-zheng1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China; 2. Research Institute of Oil and Gas Engineering, PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla, Xinjiang 841000, China
  • Received:2014-07-01 Online:2016-03-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Major International (Regional) Joint Research Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51210006), the Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51374220) and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-12-097).

摘要: 液氮温度极低(?195.8℃),当与储层岩石接触时,能够改变岩石物性并对岩石结构产生损伤致裂,因此,可用于储层压裂改造。为了研究液氮压裂时低温对岩石力学性能的影响,分别对不同含水状态(干燥与饱和)的不同类型(大理岩、砂岩和花岗岩)岩石进行液氮冻结处理,并对冻结前、后岩样进行抗拉及单轴抗压强度对比测试。结果表明,经液氮冻结后,岩石的单轴抗压强度、抗拉强度和弹性模量都降低;岩石在干燥状态下,液氮冻结对大理石强度的影响大于对红砂岩的影响;岩石饱和水状态下,液氮冻结对红砂岩强度的影响大于对大理岩的影响;饱和水状态岩石经液氮冻结后,其应力-轴应变曲线在弹性变形阶段出现一个拐点;对于同种类型岩石,饱和水状态能加剧液氮冻结并对岩石损伤,岩石强度影响显著;对3种岩样微观结构进行了电镜扫描(以大理岩为例进行分析),发现经液氮冻结后在矿物颗粒之间生成了微裂隙。研究结果可为进一步研究液氮压裂机制提供试验依据。

关键词: 液氮冻结, 抗压强度, 抗拉强度, 含水状态, 岩石损伤

Abstract: The petrophysical properties and structures of rock materials are changed when they contact with cryogenic nitrogen that has an extremely low temperature of ?195.8℃, and thus the principle can be used to improve reservoir fracturing. To study the effect of cryogenic nitrogen freezing on rock strength and mechanical parameters, different types of rock are selected, such as marble, sandstone and granite with different moisture states (dry and saturated), to freeze them with cryogenic nitrogen, and then to determine tensile strength and uniaxial compressive strength of these samples before and after freezing. The results show that the uniaxial compressive strength, tensile strength and elastic modulus of rocks are decreased after freezing with cryogenic nitrogen. When the rock sample is dry, the influence of cryogenic nitrogen freezing on the strength of marble is greater than that of red sandstone. However, when the rock sample is saturated, the influence on red sandstone is greater than that on marble. When the saturated rock is frozen with cryogenic nitrogen, there is a break point on the elastic deformation stage of stress-strain curve. For the same type of rock, the effect of cryogenic nitrogen freezing on the damage of saturated rock is more obvious than that of dry rock. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) tests are further conducted on these three types of rock and particularly the marble samples are analyzed in detail. It is found that intergranular fractures occur after cryogenic nitrogen freezing. This study provides an experimental basis for further studying the mechanism of induced fracturing by cryogenic nitrogen.

Key words: cryogenic nitrogen freezing, compressive strength, tensile strength, moisture states, rock damage

中图分类号: 

  • TU 451

[1] 张茂础, 盛谦, 崔臻, 马亚丽娜, 周光新. 岩石材料抗拉强度与劈裂节理面形貌的 加载速率效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1169-1178.
[2] 李敏, 孟德骄, 姚昕妤. 基于温度效应下二灰固化石油污染滨海盐渍土 力学特性优化固化需求[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1203-1210.
[3] 高运昌, 高盟, 尹诗, . 聚氨酯固化海砂的静力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 231-236.
[4] 沈泰宇, 汪时机, 薛乐, 李贤, 何丙辉, . 微生物沉积碳酸钙固化砂质黏性紫色土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3115-3124.
[5] 王东星, 肖 杰, 肖衡林, 马 强, . 武汉东湖淤泥碳化-固化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1805-1812.
[6] 张 伟, 曲占庆, 郭天魁, 孙 江. 热应力影响下干热岩水压致裂数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2001-2008.
[7] 吴顺川, 马 骏, 程 业, 成子桥, 李建宇, . 平台巴西圆盘研究综述及三维启裂点研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1239-1247.
[8] 王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王 滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[9] 王 琦, 孙会彬, 江 贝, 高 松, 李术才, 高红科, . 基于数字钻探和支持向量机预测岩体 单轴抗压强度的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1221-1228.
[10] 查甫生, 刘晶晶, 许龙, 邓永锋, 杨成斌, 储诚富, . 水泥−粉煤灰固化/稳定重金属污染土的电阻率 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4573-4580.
[11] 王东星, 王宏伟, 邹维列, 徐学勇, . 活性MgO−粉煤灰固化淤泥耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4675-4684.
[12] 吉恩跃, 陈生水, 傅中志, . 掺砾心墙料拉裂力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4777-4782.
[13] 杨爱武, 胡垚, 杨少坤, . 城市污泥新型固化技术及其力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4439-4449.
[14] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 江宗斌, 张广涛. 化学腐蚀-冻融综合作用下岩石损伤蠕变 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3879-3888.
[15] 孟庆山, 范 超, 曾卫星, 余克服, . 南沙群岛珊瑚礁灰岩的动态力学性能试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 183-190.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!