›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 701-710.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.03.012

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

压实花岗岩风化土物理力学性状试验研究

牛玺荣1, 2, 3,高江平3,张恩韶1   

  1. 1. 山西大学 土木工程系,山西 太原 030013;2. 北京航空航天大学 交通科学与工程学院,北京 100191; 3. 长安大学 道路结构与材料交通行业重点实验室,陕西 西安 710064
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-09 出版日期:2016-03-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:牛玺荣,男,1976年生,在站博士后,副教授,高级工程师,主要从事路基路面工程和特殊地区筑路技术方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.310821151111);国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(973计划)(No.2014CB047001);山西省交通科技计划项目(No.08-05);山西大学本科生科研训练计划资助项目(No.2016014353)。

An experimental study of the physical and mechanical properties of compacted weathered granite soil

NIU Xi-rong1, 2, 3, GAO Jiang-ping3, ZHANG En-Shao1   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030013, China; 2. School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China; 3. Key Laboratory for Road Structure and Material of Ministry of Transport, Chang?an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China
  • Received:2015-10-09 Online:2016-03-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (310821151111), the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2014CB047001), the Transportation Research Project of Shanxi Province (08-05) and the Student Research Training Program of Shanxi University (2016014353).

摘要: 吕梁山脉东麓花岗岩风化土的工程类型与我国南方以及日本、韩国等地的花岗岩风化土有较大差别。为了对吕梁山压实花岗岩风化土的物理力学性状有较全面认识,通过常规土工试验、X射线衍射试验、大固结试验、大三轴试验等方法,对其击实特性、承载特性、变形特性、剪胀特性、强度特性等进行了分析。结果表明:黏土掺量对花岗岩风化土的击实特性和承载特性影响较大,存在两个不同的黏土掺量界限值(约8%和4%),分别使得试样密实状态和承载能力处于最优;试样不存在膨胀潜势,无膨胀性,为低压缩性材料;压实花岗岩风化土颗粒破碎的特点导致试样二次加载→卸载压缩曲线存在两次明显塑性变形增大的现象;剪切时由于试样内部颗粒历经压密→错动→翻越→破碎的过程,导致不同围压下试样表现出不同的剪胀性;剪切过程中由于颗粒破碎的存在,使得试样表现出强度非线性特点。

关键词: 花岗岩风化土, 剪胀, 强度, 大固结试验, 大三轴试验

Abstract: The weathered granites in the eastern foothills of Lüliang Mountain are significantly different from those occurring in the southern China, Japan and South Korea. To understand comprehensively the physical and mechanical properties of the compacted weathered granite in Lüliang Mountain, a series of laboratory tests including routine soil test, X-ray diffraction test, large consolidation test, large-scale triaxial test and so on is performed to analyze the compaction, load-bearing, deformation, dilatancy and strength characteristics of strongly weathered granite. The experimental results show that the clay content has a remarkable influence on the compaction characteristics of compacted weathered granite and the load-bearing characteristics, and there exist two threshold values of clay content, when the clay content is about 8%, the dry density of the sample reach the maximum, while about 4%, California bearing ratio(CBR) has a maximun value. The soil samples in this study have no expansion potential and their compressibility are generally low. Two salient phenomena of plastic deformation can be observed on the secondary loading and unloading compression curve due to particle breakage of compacted weathered granite. Because the soil particles might undergo compacted, dislocated, overturned or crushed processes, the soil samples show different dilatancy characteristics under different confining pressures. In addition, due to the existence of particle breakage, the strength of sample exhibits nonlinear characteristics.

Key words: compacted weathered granite soil, dilatancy, strength, large consolidation test, large-scale triaxial test

中图分类号: 

  • U 419

[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 桂跃, 吴承坤, 赵振兴, 刘声钧, 刘锐, 张秋敏. 微生物分解有机质作用对泥炭土工程性质的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 147-155.
[3] 刘杰, 杨玉婳, 姚海林, 卢正, 岳婵, . 基于不同改性方法的分散性黏土处治试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[4] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[5] 李丽华, 余肖婷, 肖衡林, 马强, 刘一鸣, 杨 星, . 稻壳灰加筋土力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[6] 高玮, 胡承杰, 贺天阳, 陈新, 周聪, 崔爽, . 基于统计强度理论的破裂岩体本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[7] 袁庆盟, 孔亮, 赵亚鹏, . 考虑水合物填充和胶结效应的深海能源土 弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2304-2312.
[8] 陈昊, 胡小荣. 非饱和土三剪强度准则及验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2380-2388.
[9] 吴再海, 纪洪广, 姜海强, 齐兆军, 寇云鹏, . 尾砂胶结含盐冻结充填体力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1874-1880.
[10] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[11] 刘新宇, 张先伟, 岳好真, 孔令伟, 徐超, . 花岗岩残积土动态冲击性能的SHPB试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[12] 刘海峰, 朱长歧, 汪稔, 王新志, 崔翔, 王天民, . 礁灰岩-混凝土界面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1540-1548.
[13] 谈云志, 柯睿, 陈君廉, 吴军, 邓永锋. 碱溶液预降解淤泥有机质的效果与机制讨论[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1567-1572.
[14] 张茂础, 盛谦, 崔臻, 马亚丽娜, 周光新. 岩石材料抗拉强度与劈裂节理面形貌的 加载速率效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1169-1178.
[15] 李敏, 孟德骄, 姚昕妤. 基于温度效应下二灰固化石油污染滨海盐渍土 力学特性优化固化需求[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1203-1210.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!