›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S2): 35-42.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.004

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于岩体流变性的矿井防突岩柱临界安全厚度计算方法

王志荣1,贺 平1,李潇旋2,陈玲霞1   

  1. 1. 郑州大学 水利与环境学院,河南 郑州 450001;2. 黄河科技学院 建筑工程学院,河南 郑州 450000
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-01 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:王志荣,男,1963年生,博士,教授,从事地质工程与地质灾害防治方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41272339)

A method for caculating critical safe thickness of rock pillar for prevention of gas bursting based on rock rheological properties

WANG Zhi-rong1, HE Ping1, LI Xiao-xuan2, CHEN Ling-xia1   

  1. 1. School of Water Conservancy and Environment Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China; 2. College of Architectural and Civil Engineering, Huanghe Science and Technology University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
  • Received:2016-02-01 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (41272339) .

摘要: 矿井巷道在穿越含瓦斯断层或揭煤掘进过程中常常遇到前方岩柱保护厚度与延期突出问题。为了探索岩柱防突厚 度与时间的非线性耦合关系,应用RLW-2000型岩石三轴流变仪,对含煤岩系中的砂质泥岩、砂岩和泥岩进行了分级加载条件下的单轴压缩蠕变试验。通过对经典流变组合模型的分析及Matlab最小二乘迭代法的拟合,建立了改进的的七元件非线性黏弹塑性本构模型,并建立了基于岩体流变性的岩柱临界安全厚度的计算模型。豫西大平煤矿实例计算表明,埋深612 m的泥岩巷道,防突岩柱使用年限在10、20、30 a时相应的保护厚度分别为8.73、23.56、39.41 m;理论安全岩柱厚度与该矿“10 ? 20”瓦斯突出案例较为吻合,计算模型对同类工程具有一定的借鉴意义。

关键词: 含煤岩系, 蠕变试验, 延期突出, 安全厚度

Abstract: In the course of driving through the gas fault or cutting through the coal seam, it often encounters the problems that the thickness of rock pillar protection and delay outburst issues in mine roadway. In order to explore the nonlinear coupling relationship between thickness of rock pillar protection and time, compression creep test of sandy mudstone, sandstone and mudstone are conducted by using triaxial rock creep apparatus RLW-2000 under step loading in this article. By analyzing the combination of classical rheological models and Matlab least squares iteration, an improved seven elements nonlinear constitutive model of viscoelastic plasticity is established as well as the calculation model based on the pillar of rock rheology critical safety thickness. The results of case study of Daping Mine in Western Henan show that when the life spans of anti-burst pillar of mud roadway in the depth of 612 m are 10, 20, 30 years, the corresponding protection thicknesses are 8.73, 23.56, 39.41 m. The theoretical safety rock pillar thickness is consistent with outburst case of Oct. 20th; the calculation model has certain reference significance for similar engineering.

Key words: coal-bearing rocks, creep test, delay outburst, safe thickness

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 李利平, 朱宇泽, 周宗青, 石少帅, 陈雨雪, 屠文锋. 隧道突涌水灾害防突厚度计算方法及适用性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 41-50.
[2] 王立业, 周凤玺, 秦虎, . 饱和盐渍土分数阶蠕变模型及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 543-551.
[3] 雷江, 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 于洪丹, 马永尚, 谢华东, 王富刚, . 引红济石引水隧洞围岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3435-3446.
[4] 曹 梦, 叶剑红, . 中国南海钙质砂蠕变-应力-时间四参数数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1771-1777.
[5] 杨秀荣, 姜谙男, 王善勇, 张峰瑞, . 冻融循环条件下片麻岩蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4331-4340.
[6] 唐建新,腾俊洋,张 闯,刘 姝, . 层状含水页岩蠕变特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 33-41.
[7] 张 玉,王亚玲,俞 缙,张晓东,栾雅琳,. 深层膏质泥岩蠕变特性及非线性蠕变模型研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 105-112.
[8] 杨秀荣,姜谙男,江宗斌. 含水状态下软岩蠕变试验及损伤模型研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 167-174.
[9] 赵明华,朱志仁,黄明华,杨超炜,徐卓君. 考虑基桩嵌岩段侧阻的岩溶区顶板安全厚度计算[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4201-4209.
[10] 杨 超,黄 达,蔡 睿,黄润秋,. 张开穿透型单裂隙岩体三轴卸荷蠕变特性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 53-62.
[11] 张强勇,张龙云,向 文,江力宇,丁炎志,. 考虑温度效应的片麻状花岗岩三轴蠕变试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2507-2514.
[12] 史 祥,樊恒辉,刘 刚,李 普,章润红. 分散性土蠕变特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1015-1022.
[13] 孙淼军,唐辉明,王潇弘,胡新丽,汪明元,倪卫达,. 蠕动型滑坡滑带土蠕变特性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 385-391.
[14] 黄 明,付俊杰,陈福全,江 松. 桩端荷载与地震耦合作用下溶洞顶板的破坏特征及安全厚度计算[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3154-3162.
[15] 张 玉,王亚玲, 张晓东,李 静,栾雅琳. 高埋深储层膏质泥岩蠕变力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3179-3186.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!