›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 3635-3641.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.12.036

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

钻孔剪切试验及其在黄土中的应用

于永堂1, 2,郑建国1, 2,刘争宏1,张继文1   

  1. 1. 西安建筑科技大学 土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710055;2. 机械工业勘察设计研究院有限公司,陕西 西安 710043
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-17 出版日期:2016-12-10 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:于永堂,男,1983年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程监测与检测技术的研究与应用。
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技支撑计划项目资助(No.2013BAJ06B00)

Borehole shear test and its application to loess

YU Yong-tang1, 2, ZHENG Jian-guo1, 2, LIU Zheng-hong1, ZHANG Ji-wen1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China; 2. China Jikan Research Institute of Engineering Investigation and Design Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710043, China
  • Received:2014-11-17 Online:2016-12-10 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2013BAJ06B00).

摘要: 钻孔剪切试验是一种通过在钻孔侧壁上进行直剪试验来测定土体黏聚力和内摩擦角的原位测试方法。阐述和总结了钻孔剪切试验的基本原理、试验和数据处理方法。为了评估钻孔剪切试验测定黄土抗剪强度指标的适用性,采用Iowa钻孔剪切试验仪实测了不同深度黄土的抗剪强度指标,并与室内三轴剪切试验(CU)和直剪试验结果进行了对比。试验结果显示,钻孔剪切试验用于测定黄土的抗剪强度指标时,抗剪强度与法向压力具有较好的线性相关性;试验黄土的钻孔剪切试验应力-应变关系曲线为应变软化型;钻孔剪切试验结果与室内三轴剪切试验(CU)和直剪试验结果相比,黏聚力降低,内摩擦角增大;均质黄土地层的钻孔剪切试验数据离散性相对较小,可采用“整体”破坏包线法对抗剪强度指标进行统计。

关键词: 钻孔剪切试验, 原位测试, 黄土, 抗剪强度指标

Abstract: The borehole shear test (BST) is a direct shear test performed on the walls of a borehole in soil. The test is used to measure the cohesion and friction angle by destructing the soil along the circumference of the hole. The fundamental principle, testing method, and data processing method of the BST are introduced. To evaluate the applicability of this procedure to loess in Xi’an, tests were performed to determine the soil shear strength parameters of loess at several depths by using Iowa borehole shear tester. The results of the BSTs are presented along with the results of laboratory triaxial consolidated-undrained (CU) tests and direct shear tests on samples obtained from each testing depth. The BST results are compared with the results from laboratory shear strength tests. It is shown that there is a good linear correlation between shear strength and normal stress. The BST stress-strain curves of the testing loess show strain-softening behavior. The BSTs yield the cohesion values which are lower than those from the laboratory triaxial consolidated-undrained (CU) tests and direct shear tests, but higher friction angle values than those from the laboratory triaxial consolidated-undrained (CU) tests and direct shear tests. The BST results obtained in homogeneous stratum have little discreteness, and thus a “global failure envelope method” can be applied to the statistics analysis of shear strength parameters.

Key words: borehole shear test, in-situ test, loess, shear strength parameter

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443

[1] 郑方, 邵生俊, 佘芳涛, 袁浩, . 重塑黄土在不同基质吸力下的真三轴剪切试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 156-162.
[2] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, 邓国华. 人工合成类废布料纤维纱加筋黄土力学变形性质及抗溅蚀特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 394-403.
[3] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[4] 温馨, 胡志平, 张勋, 柴少波, 吕新波, . 基于Green-Ampt模型的饱和−非饱和黄土入渗 改进模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1991-2000.
[5] 方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 余永强, 李震, 林志斌, . 真三轴条件下的原状黄土增湿变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1235-1246.
[6] 刘华, 何江涛, 赵茜, 王铁行, 郭超翊, . 酸污染原状黄土渗透微观特征演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 765-772.
[7] 方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 王立平, 余永强, . 真三轴条件下非饱和黄土的有效应力屈服特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 492-500.
[8] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[9] 何鹏飞, 马巍, 穆彦虎, 黄永庭, 董建华, . 黄土−砂浆块界面剪切特性试验及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 82-90.
[10] 刘华, 张硕成, 牛富俊, 邵珠山, 牛泽林, 鲁洁, . 酸碱污染Q3黄土的一维压缩特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 210-216.
[11] 严健, 何川, 晏启祥, 许金华. 雀儿山隧道冰碛地层冻胀力原位测试及计算分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3593-3602.
[12] 朱彦鹏, 杜晓启, 杨校辉, 栗慧王君, . 挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合 管廊地基及其工后浸水试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2914-2924.
[13] 冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[14] 邵生俊, 陈 菲, 邓国华, . 基于平面应变统一强度公式的结构性黄土填料 挡墙地震被动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1255-1262.
[15] 王铁行, 金 鑫, 罗 扬, 张松林. 考虑卸荷作用的黄土湿陷性评价方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1281-1290.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!