›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 263-271.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.01.033

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

等幅剪应变下砂土循环单剪行为的离散元模拟

由子沛1, 2,钱建固1, 2,黄茂松1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-28 出版日期:2017-01-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 钱建固,男,1972年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,从事软土力学与本构理论研究工作。E-mail: qianjiangu@tongji.edu.cn E-mail:1020020197@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:由子沛,男,1989年生,博士,主要从事交通岩土工程的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 41272291,No. 51238009,No. 51578413)。

Discrete element simulation of cyclic simple shear behavior of sandy soil with constant amplitude of shear strain

YOU Zi-pei1, 2, QIAN Jian-gu1, 2, HUANG Mao-song1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2015-01-28 Online:2017-01-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41272291, 51238009, 51578413).

摘要: 循环动载下土体变形呈现的复杂各向异性,本质上依赖于土体微观组构特征的演化。为了揭示非比例循环动载下土体变形的微观机制,采用离散元方法模拟砂土的循环单剪行为。应用等幅剪应变的往复加载实现循环单剪应力路径,模拟得到了砂土的循环弱化、剪胀性、非共轴性及微观组构的演化规律。微观模拟表明,在循环剪切过程,土体表现为循环弱化行为,并最终趋于塑性安定状态。而试样组构主方向倾角和组构各向异性系数也会不断增大直至一个稳定值,同时主应变率、主应力轴和组构主方向旋转角度会存在一定的差异,即非共轴现象,随着单调剪切的进行,三者会逐渐趋于一致。土体的剪胀行为表现为循环压密性,而非共轴性呈现逐渐增强的演化规律。循环剪切过程中微观组构的主方向与应力主方向逐渐趋于一致,而微观组构各向异性呈现减弱的演化趋势。

关键词: 离散元, 循环单剪, 主应力轴旋转, 组构

Abstract: The complicated anisotropies of soil deformation under dynamic cyclic loads rely on the evolution of microscopic fabric. In order to reveal the microscopic mechanism of soil deformation under non-proportional cyclic loading, discrete element method(DEM) has been used to simulate the behavior of sand under cyclic simple shear conditions. The amplitude of shear strain is kept constant during loading to achieve cyclic simple shear stress path, the cyclic softening, dilitancy, non-coaxiality, and the evolution of fabric of sand are demonstrated. The results show that, during cyclic loading, the soil expresses a cyclic softening tendency and finally approaches a plastic stable state. The principal direction and anisotropy degree of soil fabric increase during loading and finally reach a constant value. In the meantime, there appears difference among the inclination angle of principal strain rate, principal stress axis and principal fabric, which is called noncoaxiality. The difference tends to disappear gradually during the shearing process. The dilitancy behavior of soil manifest as cyclic densification, while noncoaxiality shows an increasing tendency. The principal direction of fabric gradually agrees with the principal direction of stress during shear process, while fabric anisotropies show a softening tendency.

Key words: discrete element method(DEM), cyclic simple shear, rotation of principal stress axis, fabric

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411

[1] 薛亚东, 周杰, 赵丰, 李兴. 基于MatDEM的TBM滚刀破岩机理研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 337-346.
[2] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[3] 徐东升, 黄明, 黄佛光, 陈成. 不同级配珊瑚砂水泥胶结体的破坏行为分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1531-1539.
[4] 王钰轲, 万永帅, 方宏远, 曾长女, 石明生, 吴迪, . 圆形应力路径下软黏土的动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1643-1652.
[5] 吴祁新, 杨仲轩. 基于应变响应包络的颗粒材料增量力学行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 915-922.
[6] 孙博, 杨怀德, 谷玲, 刘跃, 唐碧华, 赵桂连, 张连明. 基于UDEC颗粒模型的不确定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3679-3688.
[7] 尹晓萌, 晏鄂川, 王鲁男, 陈 利, . 各向异性片岩的微观组构信息定量 提取与断面形貌特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2617-2627.
[8] 王蕴嘉, 宋二祥. 堆石料颗粒形状对堆积密度及强度影响的 离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2416-2426.
[9] 陈 峥, 何 平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, . 考虑土拱效应的管棚合理间距计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1993-2000.
[10] 赵兰浩, 芮开天, 刘勋楠. 非均匀颗粒快速线性接触检测算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1187-1196.
[11] 顾晓强, 杨朔成, . 基于离散元数值方法的砂土小应变弹性特性探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 785-791.
[12] 李静, 孔祥超, 宋明水, 汪勇, 王昊, 刘旭亮, . 储层岩石微观孔隙结构对岩石力学特性 及裂缝扩展影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4149-4156.
[13] 肖思友, 苏立君, 姜元俊, 李丞, 刘振宇, . 坡度对碎屑流冲击立式拦挡墙力学特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4341-4351.
[14] 蒋 雄, 徐奴文, 周 钟, 侯东奇, 李 昂, 张 敏, . 两河口水电站母线洞开挖过程围岩破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 305-314.
[15] 申海萌, 李 琦, 李霞颖, 马建力, . 川南龙马溪组页岩不同应力条件下脆性破坏特征室内实验与数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 254-262.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!