岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1993-2000.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1268

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑土拱效应的管棚合理间距计算方法

陈 峥1,何 平1,颜杜民1, 2,高红杰1   

  1. 1. 北京交通大学 隧道及地下工程教育部工程研究中心,北京 100044;2. 中铁十二局集团第三工程有限公司,山西 太原 030024
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-13 出版日期:2019-05-11 发布日期:2019-06-02
  • 通讯作者: 何平,女,1961年生,博士,教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的研究工作。E-mail:phe@bjtu.edu.cn E-mail:sdlqcz@163.com
  • 作者简介:陈峥,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划资助项目(No. 2017YFC0805401);北京交通大学横向科研项目(No. C15L00550)。

A method to calculate rational spacing between pipes in pipe roofs considering soil arching effects

CHEN Zheng1, HE Ping1, YAN Du-min1, 2, GAO Hong-jie1   

  1. 1. Tunneling and Underground Engineering Research Center of Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. The 3th Engineering Co., Ltd. of China Railway 12th Bureau Group, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China
  • Received:2018-07-13 Online:2019-05-11 Published:2019-06-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0805401) and the Horizontal Research Project of Beijing Jiaotong University (C15L00550).

摘要: 管棚作为隧道安全穿越不良地质地段的超前支护结构,依靠土拱效应发挥其支护作用,管棚间距与成拱效应密切相关。通过引入合理拱轴线,并考虑侧向土压力的影响,结合管棚间土拱破坏条件给出了管棚合理间距的计算方法,通过凤咀江隧道工程实例和离散元对比分析,验证了计算方法的合理性。进一步分析了管棚间距随管棚所处位置的变化规律以及管棚直径、土体参数等对管棚间距的影响规律。结果表明:当侧向土压力系数较小时,拱腰至边墙处管棚间距可适当调大;当侧向土压力系数较大时,拱顶至拱腰处管棚间距应适当减小。管棚间距随管棚直径和土体黏聚力的增加而线性增加,且与土体内摩擦角数呈正相关关系,随内摩擦角增大,对管棚间距的影响也越来越大。

关键词: 管棚, 土拱效应, 管棚间距, 离散元

Abstract: As an advanced supporting structure of the tunnel safely passing through unfavorable geological areas, the pipe roof play its supporting role depending on the soil arch effect. The pipe roof spacing is closely related to the arching effect. In this paper, a method of calculating the rational spacing of pipe roof is developed by introducing rational arch axis, considering the effect of lateral earth pressure, and combining with failure conditions of soil arching. The rationality of the proposed method is verified through the case study of Fengjujiang tunnel and comparing with the result of discrete element method. Furthermore, the variation of pipe roof spacing with the location of pipe roof and the influence of pipe roof diameter and soil parameters on pipe roof spacing are analyzed. The results show that when the lateral earth pressure coefficient is low, the spacing between the hance and the side wall can be increased appropriately. However, when lateral earth pressure coefficient is high, the pipe roof spacing from vault to hance needs to be decreased appropriately. Pipe roof spacing increases linearly with the increase of pipe roof diameter and soil cohesion, and is positively correlated with the friction angles in soil. With the increase of internal friction angle, the influence of pipe roof spacing is also increasing.

Key words: pipe roof, soil arching effects, pipe roof spacing, discrete element

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432
[1] 薛亚东, 周杰, 赵丰, 李兴. 基于MatDEM的TBM滚刀破岩机理研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 337-346.
[2] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[3] 刘克奇, 丁万涛, 陈瑞, 侯铭垒, . 盾构掌子面三维破坏模型构建与极限支护力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2293-2303.
[4] 徐东升, 黄明, 黄佛光, 陈成. 不同级配珊瑚砂水泥胶结体的破坏行为分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1531-1539.
[5] 吴祁新, 杨仲轩. 基于应变响应包络的颗粒材料增量力学行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 915-922.
[6] 黄宇华, 徐林荣, 周俊杰, 蔡雨, . 基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[7] 孙博, 杨怀德, 谷玲, 刘跃, 唐碧华, 赵桂连, 张连明. 基于UDEC颗粒模型的不确定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3679-3688.
[8] 王蕴嘉, 宋二祥. 堆石料颗粒形状对堆积密度及强度影响的 离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2416-2426.
[9] 芮 瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈 成, 涂树杰. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙 主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[10] 赵兰浩, 芮开天, 刘勋楠. 非均匀颗粒快速线性接触检测算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1187-1196.
[11] 刘 洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状 与主动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[12] 顾晓强, 杨朔成, . 基于离散元数值方法的砂土小应变弹性特性探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 785-791.
[13] 李静, 孔祥超, 宋明水, 汪勇, 王昊, 刘旭亮, . 储层岩石微观孔隙结构对岩石力学特性 及裂缝扩展影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4149-4156.
[14] 肖思友, 苏立君, 姜元俊, 李丞, 刘振宇, . 坡度对碎屑流冲击立式拦挡墙力学特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4341-4351.
[15] 蒋 雄, 徐奴文, 周 钟, 侯东奇, 李 昂, 张 敏, . 两河口水电站母线洞开挖过程围岩破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 305-314.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!