›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (12): 3484-3490.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.12.012

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

物理性质对黄土初始结构性的综合影响研究

王丽琴1, 2,邵生俊1, 2,鹿忠刚1   

  1. 1. 西安理工大学 岩土工程研究所,陕西 西安 710048; 2. 西安理工大学 陕西省黄土力学与工程重点实验室,陕西 西安 710048
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-08 出版日期:2017-12-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:王丽琴,女,1976年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.11572245,No.51608442);陕西省科技厅基金(No.2014JQ5173);陕西省教育厅科研计划项目资助(No.17JS089)。

Influence of physical properties on the initial structure of loess

WANG Li-qin1, 2, SHAO Sheng-jun1, 2, LU Zhong-gang1   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China; 2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Loess Mechanics and Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China
  • Received:2016-01-08 Online:2017-12-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11572245, 51608442), the Foundation of Science and Technology Department of Shaanxi Province (2014JQ5173) and the Scientific Research Program Funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (17JS089).

摘要: 黄土是具有特殊结构性的土,目前对其结构性影响因素的研究大多处于单因素定性分析阶段。构度指标反映的是黄土的初始结构性。为研究物理指标对初始结构性的综合影响,首先,对西安、兰州两地原状及重塑的黄土试样开展了不同含水率下的无侧限抗压强度试验,得到了相应黄土的构度。分析得出:构度随含水率、干密度、最小密度比、塑性指数、液性指数的增大均呈减小的趋势,除此之外,还与黄土的形成时代及其分布地区有关。其次,根据以上结论,用基本物理指标构造了一个综合物理量,进一步分析了构度与综合物理指标的关系,得出了区分地区、区分地质时代的由综合物理量直接定量计算构度指标的经验公式。最后,通过对西安另一场地的黄土进行试验得出的构度指标与运用本经验公式计算所得的构度值的对比,初步验证了其合理性、适用性。经验公式为以后通过简单易测的物理指标定量计算构度提供了一种方法。

关键词: 黄土, 结构性, 物理指标, 定量计算, 经验公式

Abstract: Loess is a soil with a special structure. Currently the studies of influence factors on loess structure are mostly qualitative analysis using single factor. Structural index reflects the initial structure of loess. To study the influence of the physical parameters on the initial structure, firstly, unconfined compressive strength tests are conducted on the undisturbed and remolded loess samples with different water content taken from Xi’an and Lanzhou. Next, the corresponding structural indexes of loess are obtained. The analysis shows that the value of structural index decreases with the increasing of water content, dry density, minimum density ratio, plasticity index and liquidity index. In addition, it is also related with the geological period and geographical distribution of loess. Secondly, according to the above conclusions, a comprehensive physical index is constructed by the fundamental physical indexes. The relationship between the structure and the comprehensive physical index is further analyzed. The empirical formulas are obtained which can directly calculate structure index quantitatively by the comprehensive physical index considering the distinction between the geographical zonation and geological periods. Finally, by the comparisons of the structure indexes obtained by test for another loess field in Xi’an and the structure indexes calculated by the empirical formulas herein, their rationality and applicability are verified. These formulas provide a simple and easy method for quantitative calculation of the structural index by physical indexes to measure in the future.

Key words: loess, structure, physical index, quantitative calculation, empirical formula

中图分类号: 

  • TU 43

[1] 郑方, 邵生俊, 佘芳涛, 袁浩, . 重塑黄土在不同基质吸力下的真三轴剪切试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 156-162.
[2] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, 邓国华. 人工合成类废布料纤维纱加筋黄土力学变形性质及抗溅蚀特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 394-403.
[3] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[4] 朱楠, 刘春原, 赵献辉, 王文静, . 不同应力路径下K0固结结构性黏土 微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
[5] 温馨, 胡志平, 张勋, 柴少波, 吕新波, . 基于Green-Ampt模型的饱和−非饱和黄土入渗 改进模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1991-2000.
[6] 李潇旋, 李涛, 李舰, 张涛. 循环荷载下非饱和结构性黏土的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1153-1160.
[7] 方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 余永强, 李震, 林志斌, . 真三轴条件下的原状黄土增湿变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1235-1246.
[8] 刘华, 何江涛, 赵茜, 王铁行, 郭超翊, . 酸污染原状黄土渗透微观特征演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 765-772.
[9] 方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 王立平, 余永强, . 真三轴条件下非饱和黄土的有效应力屈服特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 492-500.
[10] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[11] 何鹏飞, 马巍, 穆彦虎, 黄永庭, 董建华, . 黄土−砂浆块界面剪切特性试验及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 82-90.
[12] 刘华, 张硕成, 牛富俊, 邵珠山, 牛泽林, 鲁洁, . 酸碱污染Q3黄土的一维压缩特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 210-216.
[13] 朱彦鹏, 杜晓启, 杨校辉, 栗慧王君, . 挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合 管廊地基及其工后浸水试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2914-2924.
[14] 冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[15] 邵生俊, 陈 菲, 邓国华, . 基于平面应变统一强度公式的结构性黄土填料 挡墙地震被动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1255-1262.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!