岩土力学 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S2): 177-185.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1217

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

矿柱岩爆模型试验中能量释放研究

王之东1,黎立云1, 2,陈 滔1,刘兵权1   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学(北京) 力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083;2. 中国矿业大学(北京) 煤炭与资源安全开采国家重点实验室,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-09 出版日期:2018-12-21 发布日期:2019-01-03
  • 通讯作者: 黎立云,女,1959年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩石断裂力学与能量理论的研究工作。E-mail: lly@cumtb.edu.cn E-mail:wangzhidong1116@126.com
  • 作者简介:王之东,男,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩石断裂力学与动力灾害防治的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展规划(973)项目(No.2010CB226802,No.2011CB201201);国家自然科学基金项目(No.41072242)

Study of energy release in model tests on pillar rockburst

WANG Zhi-dong1, LI Li-yun1, 2, CHEN Tao1, LIU Bing-quan1   

  1. 1. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology( Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2018-07-09 Online:2018-12-21 Published:2019-01-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2010CB226802, 2011CB201201) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (41072242).

摘要: 为研究岩体工程中矿柱型岩爆的能量释放和碎块抛射速度,制成3种岩石材料的矿柱试验模型,对其进行单轴压缩试验并用高速摄像机拍摄碎块的抛射过程,实测了碎块的抛射速度。根据Griffith能量释放理论,运用有限元软件在平面应力和平面应变条件下计算试验模型破坏前后瞬时应变能的改变量(释放量),考虑部分能量耗散后运用能量守恒原理计算碎块的理论抛射速度。研究结果表明,在单轴压缩试验中红砂岩、石岛红花岗岩和白麻花岗岩的抗压强度、弹性模量依次增大,岩爆倾向性增强,其在矿柱模型破坏中3种材料的能量释放量和碎块抛射速度也依次增大;宽柱模型破坏程度比窄柱模型剧烈;平面应变模型(现场)比平面应力模型(试验)破坏时释放更多能量,即岩石的强度、弹性模量和尺寸型式决定岩爆破坏剧烈程度;矿柱岩爆模型试验中碎块的理论抛射速度与实测速度值基本接近。在不考虑尺寸效应的情况下证明了在相同应力下具有比例尺寸关系的工程体与模型发生破坏时的抛射速度基本相同。

关键词: 矿柱型岩爆, 模型试验, 有限元计算, 能量释放, 抛射速度

Abstract: In order to study energy release and ejection velocities of rock fragments induced by pillar rockburst in rock mass engineering, pillar model specimens are designed and prepared with three different types of rock materials. The ejection processes of rock fragments in failure are recorded by the high-speed camera in uniaxial compression tests; and the ejection velocities of rock fragments are calculated with experimental data. Based on Griffith' energy release theory, the released energy in failure of test models are calculated by ANSYS finite element software under both plane stress and plane strain; and the theoretical ejection velocities of fragments are calculated by the principle of conservation of energy after removing a certain percentage of energy dissipation. The results show that the compressive strength, elastic modulus, and rockburst proneness, as well as the released energy and ejection velocity of fragments increase sequentially (following the sequence of red sandstone, shidao red granite and camellia white granite). The failure degree is severer for the pillars with the larger width. The energy release under the plane strain condition (which is closer to the pillars in the field engineering) is greater than that under the plane stress condition(which is closer to the tests in this study). Therefore, the compressive strength, elastic modulus of rock materials and the shape and size of rock structure determine the disaster degree of pillar rockburst. The theoretical ejection velocities of fragments are basically close to the measured velocities in model tests on pillar rockburst. Without considering the size effect, it is proved that the ejection velocity occurred in the large-scale model (engineering scale) is basically equal to that in the small-scale model(test scale) under the same stress condition.

Key words: pillar rockburst, model test, finite element calculation, energy release, ejection velocity

中图分类号: 

  • TD 315
[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[3] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[4] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[5] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[6] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[7] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[8] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[9] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[10] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[11] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[12] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[13] 侯公羽, 胡涛, 李子祥, 谢冰冰, 肖海林, 周天赐, . 基于分布式光纤技术的采动影响下覆岩 变形演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 970-979.
[14] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[15] 陈贺, 张玉芳, 张新民, 魏少伟, . 高压注浆钢花管微型桩抗滑特性 足尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!