岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 565-573.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0047

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    

基于振动台试验的加速度积分位移方法可靠性研究

王体强,王永志,袁晓铭,汤兆光,王海,段雪锋   

  1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所 地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-08 出版日期:2019-08-01 发布日期:2019-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 王永志,男,1984年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事动力离心试验方法、地基基础抗震设计研究。E-mail: yong5893741@163.com E-mail: wangtiqiang0313@126.com
  • 作者简介:王体强,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事动力离心模型试验测量与数据处理方法方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项项目(No.2017B05);国家自然科学基金项目(No.51609218);黑龙江省自然科学基金资助项目(No.YQ2019E035)。

Reliability analysis of acceleration integral displacement method based on shaking table tests

WANG Ti-qiang, WANG Yong-zhi, YUAN Xiao-ming, TANG Zhao-guang, WANG Hai, DUAN Xue-feng   

  1. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Helong 150080, China
  • Received:2019-01-08 Online:2019-08-01 Published:2019-08-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration(2017B05); the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51609218), and Heilongjiang Natural Science Foundation(YQ2019E035).

摘要: 土体应变变形是土工测试技术的重要难题之一,加速度积分位移是目前动荷载下原位监测和模型试验中认识土体剪应变响应的一种普遍方法,但缺乏验证与可靠性研究。设计砂质边坡?摇臂?质量块振动台模型试验,实测两地震荷载下多组工况的质量块加速度与位移响应时程,探讨了4种代表性方法求解动态、永久位移的可靠性及偏转影响。结果表明,动态位移求解采用高通滤波是一种可靠途径且受积分方式影响较小,各方法在动态位移工况中积分位移与实测相比,峰值平均误差小于等于25%;双拟法积分位移发生严重偏离,与函数形式和处理过程相关。永久位移求解采用高通滤波导致加速度低频成分缺失而无法得到永久位移;双拟法积分位移与实测相比吻合较好,两地震荷载中误差分别为7%和5%;偏转对动态位移求解可靠性影响较小,但对永久位移影响严重,双拟法呈现发散而失真。试验方法与结论,对认识加速度积分位移求取土体剪应变的可靠性和合理选取数据分析方法具有重要科学价值和指导意义。

关键词: 土工测试, 加速度时程, 积分位移, 数据分析方法, 振动台试验, 可靠性

Abstract: Measurement on strain deformation of soils is one of the significant challenge in geotechnical testing technology. Double integration of acceleration measurement for displacement is a common method in understanding the shear strain response of soil in in-situ monitoring and model tests under dynamic loading, but it lacks validity and reliability study. In this paper, the sand-slope-rocker-mass vibration table model test was designed, besides the mass acceleration and time-history response of displacement under multiple working conditions and two seismic loads were measured. Four representative methods were applied to solve dynamic and permanent displacement and their reliability and deflection effects were discussed. The results show that high-pass filtering method, which is less affected by the integral methods, is reliable to obtain dynamic displacements. Comparing the integral displacement with the measurement values in different dynamic displacement conditions under two earthquake loadings, the average errors of peak values are less than 25%. However, the dynamic displacements calculated by double integration present obvious deviation, which is related to the function form and processing flow. To obtain permanent displacements, the integral methods consisting of high-pass filtering process are invalidated due to the loss in low frequency components of acceleration records. The permanent displacements calculated by double integration method are in good agreement with the measured values. The relative errors are 7% and 5% respectively under two seismic loading conditions. The base deflection presents less impact on the reliability of dynamic displacements in different integral methods. But it plays obvious impacts on the permanent displacements. The permanent displacements calculated by double integration are distorted induced by the influence of base deflection. Experimental methods and conclusions herein provide valuable scientific reference and useful suggestions in the selection of double integral methods of acceleration to obtain soil displacement .

Key words: geotechnical testing, acceleration time history, integral displacement, data analysis methods, shaking table tests, reliability

中图分类号: 

  • P554
[1] 徐超, 罗敏敏, 任非凡, 沈盼盼, 杨子凡. 加筋土柔性桥台复合结构抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[2] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 基于自由场大型振动台试验的饱和砂土 固-液相变特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[3] 杨长卫, 童心豪, 王栋, 谭信荣, 郭雪岩, 曹礼聪, . 地震作用下有砟轨道路基动力响应 规律振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2215-2223.
[4] 乔向进, 梁庆国, 曹小平, 王丽丽, . 桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[5] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[6] 吴兴征, 王瑞凯, 辛军霞, . 特定场地下土工构筑物的几何可靠性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2070-2080.
[7] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[8] 韩俊艳, 李满君, 钟紫蓝, 许敬叔, 李立云, 兰景岩, 杜修力. 基于埋地管道非一致激励振动台 试验的土层地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[9] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[10] 潘旦光, 程业, 陈清军. 地下商场结构对地面运动影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[11] 李平, 张宇东, 薄涛, 辜俊儒, 朱胜. 基于离心机振动台试验的梯形河谷场地 地震动效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
[12] 冯立, 丁选明, 王成龙, 陈志雄. 考虑接缝影响的地下综合管廊振动台模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[13] 张恒源, 钱德玲, 沈超, 戴启权. 水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[14] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[15] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!