岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 3071-3080.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0936

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同排水条件下城市固废一维降解固结解析解

李称1, 2, 3,吴文兵1, 2, 3,梅国雄1, 2, 3,宗梦繁1, 2, 3,梁荣柱1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学 工程学院 岩土钻掘与防护教育部工程研究中心,湖北 武汉 430074; 2. 广西大学 土木建筑工程学院 广西防灾减灾与工程安全重点实验室,广西 南宁 530004; 3. 广西大学 工程防灾与结构安全教育部重点实验室,广西 南宁 530004
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-28 出版日期:2019-08-12 发布日期:2019-08-25
  • 通讯作者: 梅国雄,男,1975年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事固结理论、土与结构相互作用方面的研究。E-mail: meiguox@163.com E-mail: LeeChen@cug.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李称,男,1995年生,硕士研究生,主要从事固结理论方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51578164, No. 51678547);中国科协青年人才托举工程项目(No. 2018QNRC001);中国地质大学(武汉)教学实验室开放基金(No. SKJ2018139)

Analytical solution for 1D degradation-consolidation of municipal solid waste under different drainage conditions

LI Chen1, 2, 3, WU Wen-bing1, 2, 3, MEI Guo-xiong1, 2, 3, ZONG Meng-fan1, 2, 3, LIANG Rong-zhu1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. Engineering Research Center of Rock-Soil Drilling & Excavation and Protection of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of Ministry of Education, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China
  • Received:2018-05-28 Online:2019-08-12 Published:2019-08-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51578164, 51678547), the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (2018QNRC001) and the China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) Teaching Laboratory Open Foundation (SKJ2018139).

摘要: 目前关于城市固废的降解固结理论研究均沿用太沙基传统排水边界,但是这样不能完全描述垃圾填埋场中复杂的排水边界条件。因此,在已有的简化降解固结模型基础上引入连续排水边界条件,建立了新鲜面为连续排水边界的饱和城市固废一维降解固结模型。在此基础上,借助特征函数解偏微分方程得到了级数形式的解析解答,解的退化检验和收敛性判断初步验证了其合理性。解析解与已有解答的对比分析显示,引入连续排水边界条件后,超静孔压分布有显著的变化;且解析解可解决初始条件和边界条件的矛盾,能反映边界上孔压消散的时间效应。进一步的参数敏感性分析显示,通过调整界面参数可以模拟各种排水条件,获得从完全不排水到完全排水的连续解答。此外,从排水能力差异会改变降解固结发展速度出发,提出了一种保证填埋场稳定的可行策略。

关键词: 城市固废, 固结, 降解, 连续排水边界

Abstract: At present, all of the theoretical studies about degradation-consolidation of municipal solid waste (MSW) still use the traditional Terzaghi drainage boundary. However, it cannot fully describe the complex drainage boundary conditions in landfills. Accordingly, this paper introduces the continuous drainage boundary into the existing simplified degradation-consolidation model, and then builds a new model of 1D degradation-consolidation of saturated MSW with a fresh surface described by continuous drainage boundary. On this basis, the analytical solution is obtained by solving the characteristic function, and its rationality is preliminarily verified through degradation analysis and convergence judgment. A comparative analysis of the present solution and the existing solutions shows that the distribution of excess pore pressure changes significantly after introducing the continuous drainage boundary condition. Meanwhile, the present solution can solve the contradiction between initial condition and boundary condition, and reflect the time effect of the pore pressure dissipation on the boundary. Further parameter sensitivity analysis indicates that various drainage conditions can be simulated by adjusting the interface parameter, and continuous solutions from complete impervious condition to complete pervious condition are available under boundary conditions. As the interface parameter changes, pore pressure distribution, strain development and consolidation degree development show continuous regular changes. Finally, a feasible strategy of changing drainage conditions is proposed to ensure the stability of landfills based on the characteristics above.

Key words: municipal solid waste, consolidation, degradation, continuous drainage boundary

中图分类号: 

  • TU 451
[1] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[2] 孙德安, 薛垚, 汪磊, . 变荷载作用下考虑半透水边界热传导性的 一维饱和土热固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1465-1473.
[3] 李红坡, 梅国雄, 肖涛, 陈征. 涂抹区重叠竖井地基固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1560-1566.
[4] 江留慧, 李传勋, 杨怡青, 张锐. 变荷载下双层地基一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1583-1590.
[5] 陈琼, 崔德山, 王菁莪, 刘清秉. 不同固结状态下黄土坡滑坡滑 带土的蠕变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1635-1642.
[6] 师旭超, 孙运德. 线性卸荷作用下软土超孔隙水压力 变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1333-1338.
[7] 任宇晓, 闫玥, 付登锋. 浅层地基上管道轴向运动的阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1404-1411.
[8] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[9] 郎瑞卿, 杨爱武, 闫澍旺, . 修正等应变假定下刚性桩复合地基固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 813-822.
[10] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[11] 程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[12] 蒙宇涵, 张必胜, 陈征, 梅国雄, . 线性加载下含砂垫层地基固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 461-468.
[13] 涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基 强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[14] 刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土 一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[15] 张雷, 王宁伟, 景立平, 方晨, 董瑞, . 电渗排水固结中电极材料的对比试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3493-3501.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!