岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 2395-2404.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0277

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

用孔隙分布曲线预测压实黄土非饱和渗透曲 线及其适用范围的探讨

李燕1, 2,李同录1, 2,侯晓坤3,李华4,张杰1, 2   

  1. 1. 长安大学 地质工程与测绘学院,陕西 西安 710054;2. 黄土高原水循环与地质环境教育部野外科学观测研究站,甘肃 正宁 745399; 3. 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所,北京 100029;4. 武警工程大学 装备管理与保障学院,陕西 西安 710086
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-22 修回日期:2021-05-08 出版日期:2021-09-10 发布日期:2021-08-27
  • 通讯作者: 李同录,男,1965年生,博士,教授,主要从事地质灾害及非饱和黄土方面研究工作。E-mail: dcdgx08@chd.edu.cn E-mail:liyan_dzgc@chd.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李燕,女,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事非饱和黄土与边坡工程研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.41790442,No.41772278)

Prediction of unsaturated permeability curve of compaction loess with pore-size distribution curve and its application scope

LI Yan1, 2, LI Tong-lu1, 2, HOU Xiao-kun3, LI Hua4, ZHANG Jie1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Geology Engineering and Surveying, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 2. Observation and Research Station of Water Cycle and Geological Environment for the Chinese Loess Plateau, Ministry of Education, Zhengning, Gansu 745399, China; 3. Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; 4. School of Equipment Management and Support, Armed Police Force Engineering University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710086, China
  • Received:2021-02-22 Revised:2021-05-08 Online:2021-09-10 Published:2021-08-27
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41790442, 41772278).

摘要: 土体非饱和渗透曲线受其孔隙分布的控制,因此可以用孔隙分布曲线预测渗透曲线。为了探讨这一方法对压实黄土的适用范围,制备了3组不同干密度的压实黄土样,通过压汞试验测得土样的孔隙分布(pore-size distribution,简称PSD)曲线,用课题组设计的小型土柱设备测定了其非饱和渗透曲线。利用PSD曲线预测渗透曲线,并与实测数据进行对比。结果表明:压实黄土的渗透曲线可分为由毛细水主导的低基质吸力阶段和由吸附水主导的高基质吸力阶段。在低吸力段,3组土样的渗透曲线差异较大,而在高吸力段3组土样的渗透曲线重合,表明高吸力段的渗透性和干密度无关。此外,3组土样的预测结果和实测数据在低吸力段吻合较好,在高吸力段预测结果小于实测结果。从PSD曲线的预测原理可见,该方法适合毛细水不适合吸附水。为此对高吸力段渗透曲线提出了修正方法,修正后的曲线可描述全基质吸力范围内的渗透曲线。

关键词: 压实黄土, 瞬态剖面法, 孔隙分布曲线, 非饱和渗透曲线, 预测方法

Abstract: The unsaturated permeability curve is governed by the pore-size distribution curve, which can be used to predict the permeability curve. In order to investigate the applicability of this method for compacted loess, three groups of compacted loess samples with different dry densities were prepared. The pore-size distribution (PSD) curves of soil samples were measured using mercury injection porosimeter test. The unsaturated permeability curves of soil samples were measured by small soil column equipment designed by our research group. Then the PSD curves were used to predict the permeability curves and compared with the measured data from soil column test. The results show that the permeability curves of compacted loess can be divided into a low matric suction stage dominated by capillary water, and a high matric suction stage dominated by adsorbed water. In the low suction stage, the permeability curves of the three soil samples differ greatly. While in the high suction section, the permeability curves of the three soil samples coincide, indicating that the permeability of the high suction section has nothing to do with the density of soil. In addition, the predicted results of three groups of soil samples are in good agreement with the measured data in the low suction section, but the predicted results in the high suction section are smaller than the measured results. It can be seen from the principle of the prediction method that this method is suitable for capillary water but not for adsorbed water. Therefore, a modified method is proposed for the prediction of permeability curve in the high suction section, and the modified method can describe the permeability curve in the whole matric suction range.

Key words: compacted loess soil, instantaneous profile method, pore-size distribution curve, unsaturated permeability curve, prediction method

中图分类号: 

  • TU411
[1] 葛苗苗, 李宁, 盛岱超, 朱才辉, PINEDA Jubert, . 水力耦合作用下非饱和压实黄土 细观变形机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2437-2448.
[2] 郝延周, 王铁行, 程磊, 金鑫, . 考虑干湿循环影响的压实黄土结构性本构关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 2977-2986.
[3] 史江伟, 范燕波, 裴伟伟, 陈永辉, 张显, . 盾构下穿非连续管线变形特性及预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 143-150.
[4] 范日东, 杜延军, 刘松玉, 杨玉玲, . 无机盐溶液作用下砂−膨润土竖向隔离屏障 材料化学相容性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 736-746.
[5] 李华, 李同录, 江睿君, 范江文. 基于滤纸法的非饱和渗透性曲线测试[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 895-904.
[6] 骆顺天, 杨凡杰, 周辉, 张传庆, 王旭宏, 吕涛, 朱勇, 卢景景, . 基于统计分析的地下厂房边墙最大收敛变形 多指标预测方法 [J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3415-3424.
[7] 陶高梁, 吴小康, 甘世朝, 肖衡林, 马 强, 罗晨晨, . 不同初始孔隙比下非饱和黏土渗透性 试验研究及模型预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1761-1770.
[8] 王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
[9] 高远, 于永堂, 郑建国, 梁谊, . 压实黄土在溶滤作用下的强度特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3833-3843.
[10] 杨文保, 吴琪, 陈国兴, . 长江入海口原状土动剪切模量预测方法探究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3889-3896.
[11] 黄启迪,蔡国庆,赵成刚, . 非饱和土干化过程微观结构演化规律研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 165-173.
[12] 王 飞,李国玉,穆彦虎,张 鹏,吴亚虎,范善智, . 干湿循环条件下压实黄土变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2306-2312.
[13] 吴文彪,郑俊杰,曹文昭. 考虑含水率影响的压实黄土路堤稳定性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 542-546.
[14] 文 杰 ,韩金良 ,姚磊华 ,李论基,. 原位非饱和黄土渗透系数研究[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2599-2606.
[15] 杨 晶 ,白晓红,. 压实黄土非线性压缩应力-应变关系在地基沉降计算中的应用[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1002-1008.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .