岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 160-168.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0620

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

超固结粉质黏土水平应力释放特征与 静止侧压力系数计算方法

陈树峰1,孔令伟2, 3,罗滔1   

  1. 1. 西京学院 陕西省混凝土结构安全与耐久性重点实验室,陕西 西安 710123;2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点 实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;3. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-22 修回日期:2021-09-17 出版日期:2022-01-10 发布日期:2022-01-07
  • 通讯作者: 孔令伟,男,1967年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土的力学特性与灾害防治技术研究。E-mail: lwkong@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:csf1127@qq.com
  • 作者简介:陈树峰,男,1989年生,博士,讲师,主要从事寒区特殊土力学的教学和研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.12102367,No.41877281);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(No.2021JQ-870);陕西省教育厅一般专项项目(No. 21JK0961)

Lateral stress release characteristics of overconsolidated silty clay and calculation method for lateral earth pressure coefficient at rest

CHEN Shu-feng1, KONG Ling-wei2, 3, LUO Tao1   

  1. 1. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Safety and Durability of Concrete Structures, Xijing University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710123, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2021-04-22 Revised:2021-09-17 Online:2022-01-10 Published:2022-01-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12102367, 41877281), the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province (2021JQ-870) and the Special Fund for Scientific Research by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (21JK0961).

摘要: 如何合理地描述超固结地层静止侧压力系数 分布规律对岩土工程有重要的理论意义和应用价值。通过超固结地层形成过程的应力发展分析,开展了侧应力松弛试验,研究了超固结粉质黏土水平应力释放规律,建立了残余超固结水平应力 与超固结比OCR的联系,提出了基于水平应力释放的超固结土 计算方法,并用原位土体水平应力KSB试验和室内试验进行了验证。提出的超固结土 计算方法物理意义清晰,并在中高OCR条件下实现了与前人归纳经验公式的统一。结果表明:超固结水平应力 经历回弹与松弛2个释放阶段后稳定于残余值 ,粉质黏土 释放主要发生在回弹阶段;超固结水平应力残余值与初始值之比 随OCR增大而增大,但在OCR达到一定值OCRr后趋于稳定。研究成果可供超固结地层中的挡土结构物土压力计算和数值分析提供参考和借鉴。

关键词: 静止侧压力系数, 超固结, 粉质黏土, 侧应力松弛, 原位测试

Abstract: It is of important theoretical value and practical significance in geotechnical engineering to describe the lateral earth pressure coefficient at rest in overconsolidation stratum. In this study, based on the theoretical analysis evolution of lateral pressure at rest during overconsolidation, the excess lateral stress release characteristics of overconsolidated silty clay were investigated through confined rheological tests. The relationship between the residual excess lateral earth pressure and the overconsolidation ratio (OCR) was established, and a new method for calculating the at rest lateral earth pressure coefficient in overconsolidation stratum was proposed. The proposed method was validated by the in-situ KSB test and laboratory test, respectively. Moreover, the proposed method possessed clear physical meanings and achieved unification with empirical formulas under medium-high OCR levels. The results revealed that excess lateral earth pressure went through rebound process and relaxation process, and finally stabilized at residual excess lateral earth pressure . For silty clay, the release of excess lateral earth pressure mainly occurred during the rebound process. The ratio of residual value and initial value of excess lateral earth pressure increased with increased OCR, and no longer changed when OCR>OCRr. The conclusions could provide reference and basis for the calculation and numerical analysis of earth pressure of retaining structures in overconsolidation stratum.

Key words: earth pressure coefficient at rest, overconsolidation, silty clay, lateral stress relaxation, in-situ test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 431
[1] 李镜培, 刘耕云, 周攀, . 基于相似性原理超固结土不排水扩张半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 582-590.
[2] 孙增春, 郭浩天, 刘汉龙, 吴焕然, 肖杨, . 基于扰动状态概念的饱和黏土热弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1325-1334.
[3] 张乐, 党发宁, 高俊, 丁九龙. 线性加载条件下考虑应力历史的饱和黏土一维非线性固结渗透试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1078-1087.
[4] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[5] 乔亚飞, 逯兴邦, 黄俊, 丁文其, . 欠固结地层静止侧压力简化计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3722-3729.
[6] 严健, 何川, 晏启祥, 许金华. 雀儿山隧道冰碛地层冻胀力原位测试及计算分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3593-3602.
[7] 刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 李学彬, 张建俊, 任 昆, . 部分排水时饱和粉质黏土变围压循环三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1413-1419.
[8] 朱俊高, 蒋明杰, 陆阳洋, 吉恩跃, 罗学浩, . 应力状态对粗颗粒土静止侧压力系数影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 827-833.
[9] 胡田飞, 刘建坤, 王天亮, 岳祖润, . 粉质黏土变形特性的冻融循环效应及其双屈 服面本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 987-997.
[10] 王秋生, 周济兵. 基于广义热力学的超固结土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4178-4184.
[11] 杨文保, 吴琪, 陈国兴, . 长江入海口原状土动剪切模量预测方法探究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3889-3896.
[12] 郑 刚, 栗晴瀚, 哈 达, 程雪松, . 天津市承压层应力状态及减压引发沉降规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 285-294.
[13] 刘家顺,张向东,孙嘉宝,杨建军,方天健. 主应力轴旋转下K0固结饱和粉质黏土孔压及变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2787-2794.
[14] 朱俊高,陆阳洋,蒋明杰,褚福永,. 新型静止侧压力系数试验仪的研制与应用[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3071-3076.
[15] 刘松玉,曹菁菁,蔡光华, . 活性氧化镁碳化固化粉质黏土微观机制[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1543-1552.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .