岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S1): 97-106.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2137

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

电渗−堆载作用下非饱和土轴对称固结特性分析

秦爱芳,孟红苹,江良华   

  1. 上海大学 力学与工程科学学院,上海 200444
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-20 修回日期:2022-03-31 出版日期:2022-06-30 发布日期:2022-07-13
  • 作者简介:秦爱芳,女,1966年生,博士,教授,主要从事非饱和土固结、核废料地质处置方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.42072292)。

Analysis of axisymmetric consolidation characteristics of unsaturated soils under surcharge loading and electro-osmosis

QIN Ai-fang, MENG Hong-ping, JIANG Liang-hua   

  1. School of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
  • Received:2021-12-20 Revised:2022-03-31 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-07-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(42072292).

摘要: 地基处理中,电渗常与堆载预压联合使用。基于Fredlund非饱和土三维固结理论和Esrig电渗固结理论及等应变假设,推导出电流场与渗流场耦合作用下,考虑径竖向渗流及涂抹效应的轴对称固结控制方程;利用Laplace变换、解耦技术及Laplace逆变换等方法,得到了时域内的半解析解。然后,将所得解分别退化至饱和土中考虑电渗−堆载联合和非饱和土中仅考虑堆载这两种情况与已有文献结果对比,验证了研究方法的可靠性。最后,通过算例研究有效电压、电−水力渗透系数比和涂抹系数对非饱和土轴对称电渗固结特性的影响。结果表明:超孔隙水压最终产生的负孔压与有效电压成正比;电渗−堆载联合下的非饱和土地基固结可分为两个阶段,分别主要受堆载和电渗影响;电渗联合堆载处理地基时的最终沉降是两种作用分别处理地基时的最终沉降之和,且对于低渗透性的土体,其固结速率将显著提高;此外,施加电压后涂抹系数在同区间内,超孔隙水压消散的速率差距比不考虑电压时的大,且涂抹系数越小,最终产生的负孔隙水压越大。

关键词: 电渗, 非饱和土, 涂抹效应, 变荷载, 半解析解

Abstract: Electro-osmosis is frequently used in combination with surcharge loading in foundation treatment. Based on Fredlund’s three-dimensional consolidation theory of unsaturated soil, Esrig’s electro-osmosis consolidation theory and the equal-strain assumption, the governing equations of axisymmetric consolidation considering the radial-vertical flow and smear effect under the coupled electrical and flow field are derived. The semi-analytical solution in the time domain is obtained using Laplace transform, decoupling technology and Laplace inverse transform. Then, the solution of this paper is degraded to the two cases of considering the combined electro-osmotic and surcharge preloading in saturated soil and considering only the load in unsaturated soil respectively to compare with the existing solutions to verify the reliability of the solution in this study. Finally, the effects of the parameters such as effective voltage, electro-hydraulic permeability coefficient ratio, and smear coefficient on the axisymmetric consolidation characteristics of unsaturated soils are investigated by arithmetic examples. The results show that the negative pore pressure finally generated by excess pore-water pressure is proportional to the effective voltage; the consolidation of unsaturated soil under electro-osmosis and surcharge preloading can be divided into two stages, which are mainly affected by loading and electro-osmosis; the settlement of the foundation treated by electro-osmotic and surcharge preloading is the sum of the settlements when the two actions treat the foundation separately, and for the soil with low permeability, the consolidation rate will be significantly increased. Furthermore, the difference in the rate of excess pore-water pressure dissipation in the same interval of the smear coefficient after applying voltage is larger than that when voltage is not considered, and the smaller the smear coefficient is, the greater the negative pore-water pressure finally generates.

Key words: electro-osmosis, unsaturated soil, smear effect, time-varying load, semi-analytical solution

中图分类号: 

  • TU43
[1] 曾立峰, 邵龙潭, 郭晓霞, . 土中有效应力概念的起源与发展[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 127-144.
[2] 汪磊, 张立婷, 沈思东, 徐永福, 夏小和. 分段循环荷载作用下非饱和土轴对称固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 203-212.
[3] 翟张辉, 张亚国, 李同录, 肖书雄, . 考虑边界效应的非饱和土圆柱孔扩张问题解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 301-311.
[4] 王智超, 罗磊, 田英辉, 张春会, . 非饱和压实土率敏性及蠕变时效特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1816-1824.
[5] 王海曼, 倪万魁, 刘魁, . 延安压实黄土土−水特征曲线的快速预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1845-1853.
[6] 高游, 李泽, 孙德安, 于海浩, 陈波, . 考虑初始孔隙比影响的单/双峰土−水特征曲线 模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1441-1452.
[7] 吴思思, 罗文强, 李寅灿, 崔伟健, 王硕. 连续排水边界下考虑变荷载的软土一维 非线性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1503-1512.
[8] 仉文岗, 顾鑫, 刘汉龙, 张青, 王林, 王鲁琦, . 基于贝叶斯更新的非饱和土坡参数概率 反演及变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
[9] 舒进辉, 马强, 周凤玺, 李强, . 非饱和土地基中P1波通过波阻板的传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1135-1146.
[10] 李镜培, 刘耕云, 周攀, . 基于相似性原理超固结土不排水扩张半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 582-590.
[11] 朱悦璐, 陈磊, . 基于最小作用原理的Richards方程变分解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 119-126.
[12] 刘丽, 吴羊, 李旭, 赵煜鑫, . 压实度对宽级配土水力特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2545-2555.
[13] 仇超, 李传勋, 李红军, . 单级等速加载下高压缩性软土 非线性大应变固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2195-2206.
[14] 刘樟荣, 叶为民, 崔玉军, 朱合华, 王琼, 陈永贵, . 基于微孔填充和毛细管凝聚理论的持水曲线模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1549-1556.
[15] 秦爱芳, 江良华, 许薇芳, 梅国雄, . 连续渗透边界下非饱和土竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1345-1354.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .