岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S1): 301-311.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1650

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑边界效应的非饱和土圆柱孔扩张问题解析

翟张辉1,张亚国2, 3,李同录1,肖书雄2   

  1. 1. 长安大学 地质工程与测绘学院,陕西 西安 710054;2. 长安大学 建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710061; 3. 甘肃路桥建设集团有限公司 公路建设与养护技术、材料及装备交通运输行业研发中心,甘肃 兰州 730030
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-04 修回日期:2021-03-31 出版日期:2022-06-30 发布日期:2022-07-14
  • 通讯作者: 张亚国,男,1984年生,博士,副教授,主要从事土力学与基础工程方面的科研与教学工作。E-mail: yaguozhang29@chd.edu.cn E-mail:zhaizhanghui0607@163.com
  • 作者简介:翟张辉,男,1993年生,博士研究生,主要从事圆孔扩张理论及非饱和土力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41807242,No.42072311);公路建设与养护技术、材料及装备交通运输行业研发中心开放基金课题(No.GLKF201810)。

Solution for cylindrical cavity expansion in unsaturated soils considering boundary effect

ZHAI Zhang-hui1, ZHANG Ya-guo2, 3, LI Tong-lu1, XIAO Shu-xiong2   

  1. 1. School of Geological Engineering and Surveying, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China; 3. Research and Development Center of Transport Industry of Technologies, Materials and Equipments of Highway Construction and Maintenance, Gansu Road & Bridge Construction Group, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China)
  • Received:2020-11-04 Revised:2021-03-31 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-07-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41807242, 42072311) and the Opening Foundation of Research and Development Center of Transport Industry of Technologies, Materials and Equipments of Highway Construction and Maintenance (GLKF201810).

摘要: 圆柱孔扩张理论是分析沉桩挤土及旁压试验等岩土工程问题的有效方法,然而已有研究中多假定土体为无限连续介质,当圆柱孔周围存在约束边界时并不适用。采用临界状态模型描述非饱和土的应力−应变关系,在此基础上引入反映土体比体积−吸力关系的液相本构方程,推导了非饱和土中存在固定边界时,圆柱孔扩张问题在不同排水条件下的半解析解。通过计算不同工况,对比分析边界效应、非饱和吸力效应和排水条件对圆柱孔扩张响应的影响。结果表明,受边界效应影响,扩孔压力随着孔径增大而持续增大,这与无边界时扩孔压力趋于某一稳定值的情况有所不同;当圆柱孔扩张相同孔径时,周围固定边界范围越小,所需扩孔压力越大。土体初始吸力越大,扩孔压力也越大,相同应力增量引起的体积压缩量减小,说明土体出现吸力硬化效应。在孔周相同位置处,不排水比排水条件下的土体饱和度高、吸力小,对应的有效应力分量也小;距孔壁越近,该差异越明显。

关键词: 圆柱孔扩张, 非饱和土, 边界效应, 吸力硬化效应, 半解析解

Abstract: The cylindrical cavity expansion theory is an effective method to analyze various geotechnical problems, such as pile installations and pressure meter tests. However, most of existing studies which assume that the soil is an infinite medium are not suitable for the case of finite medium. The critical state model is used to describe the stress-strain relationship of unsaturated soils and the constitutive model for water phase which represents the relationship between the specific volume and suction is introduced. With the boundary effects considered, the semi-analytical solutions for cylindrical cavity expansion in unsaturated soil under different drainage conditions are deduced. Intensive parametric studies have been conducted to analyze the effects of boundary, suction and drainage conditions on the results of cavity expansion. The results show that the cavity pressure increases continuously with the increase of cavity radius under the effects of boundary, which is different from the cavity pressure that tends to be a stable value in infinite medium. The greater cavity pressure is required to expand the same cavity radius for a smaller boundary size. In addition, the cavity pressure increases and variation of specific volume caused by the same stress increment decreases with the increase in initial suction, which can be attributed as the suction hardening effect. The saturation of soil at the same position around the cavity is higher, and the suction and effective stress components are lower in the case of undrained condition than drained condition. It is more obvious when the distance from the cavity wall decreases.

Key words: cylindrical cavity expansion, unsaturated soil, boundary effect, suction hardening effect, semi-analytical solution

中图分类号: 

  • TU443
[1] 秦爱芳, 孟红苹, 江良华. 电渗−堆载作用下非饱和土轴对称固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 97-106.
[2] 曾立峰, 邵龙潭, 郭晓霞, . 土中有效应力概念的起源与发展[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 127-144.
[3] 汪磊, 张立婷, 沈思东, 徐永福, 夏小和. 分段循环荷载作用下非饱和土轴对称固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 203-212.
[4] 睢博栋 . 单根垂直旋喷桩施工引起土体位移的预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 513-520.
[5] 王智超, 罗磊, 田英辉, 张春会, . 非饱和压实土率敏性及蠕变时效特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1816-1824.
[6] 王海曼, 倪万魁, 刘魁, . 延安压实黄土土−水特征曲线的快速预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1845-1853.
[7] 高游, 李泽, 孙德安, 于海浩, 陈波, . 考虑初始孔隙比影响的单/双峰土−水特征曲线 模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1441-1452.
[8] 仉文岗, 顾鑫, 刘汉龙, 张青, 王林, 王鲁琦, . 基于贝叶斯更新的非饱和土坡参数概率 反演及变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
[9] 舒进辉, 马强, 周凤玺, 李强, . 非饱和土地基中P1波通过波阻板的传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1135-1146.
[10] 李镜培, 刘耕云, 周攀, . 基于相似性原理超固结土不排水扩张半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 582-590.
[11] 王体强, 王永志, 张雪东, 汤兆光, 段雪锋, . 超重力振动台柔性叠层箱剪切效能评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 719-728.
[12] 朱悦璐, 陈磊, . 基于最小作用原理的Richards方程变分解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 119-126.
[13] 刘丽, 吴羊, 李旭, 赵煜鑫, . 压实度对宽级配土水力特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2545-2555.
[14] 刘樟荣, 叶为民, 崔玉军, 朱合华, 王琼, 陈永贵, . 基于微孔填充和毛细管凝聚理论的持水曲线模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1549-1556.
[15] 秦爱芳, 江良华, 许薇芳, 梅国雄, . 连续渗透边界下非饱和土竖井地基固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1345-1354.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .