岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 1816-1824.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1734

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非饱和压实土率敏性及蠕变时效特征试验研究

王智超1, 2,罗磊2,田英辉3,张春会4   

  1. 1. 湘潭大学 岩土力学与工程安全湖南省重点实验室,湖南 湘潭 411105;2. 湘潭大学 土木工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411105; 3. 墨尔本大学 基础设施工程系,澳大利亚 维多利亚;4. 河北科技大学 建筑工程学院,河北 石家庄 050018
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-15 修回日期:2022-04-30 出版日期:2022-07-26 发布日期:2022-08-04
  • 作者简介:王智超,男,1980年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土流变学和道路工程等方面的教学和科研。
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目(No. 17B260);湖湘高层次人才聚集工程?创新团队(No. 2019RS1059);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51308485)。

Experimental study on time-dependent characteristics of rate-sensitivity and creep of unsaturated compacted soil

WANG Zhi-chao1, 2, LUO Lei2, TIAN Ying-hui3, ZHANG Chun-hui4   

  1. 1. Hunan Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Engineering Safety, Xiangtan University Xiangtan, Hunan 411105, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan 411105, China; 3. Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 4. School of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050018, China
  • Received:2021-10-15 Revised:2022-04-30 Online:2022-07-26 Published:2022-08-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Excellent Youth Project of the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province (17B260), the High-level Talent Gathering Project in Hunan Province (2019RS1059) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51308485).

摘要: 为研究部分饱和状态下高填方回填土工后长期变形,对非饱和压实土在可控基质吸力下分别开展率敏性和蠕变试验,并分析两者间时效对应关系。率敏性试验采取不同加载速率的三轴剪切,分析基质吸力(0、100、200、300 kPa)、加载速率(0.40、0.02 mm/min)以及超固结比(1、4和8)对土体强度和变形特征的影响,并确定三轴剪切蠕变的三级加载应力水平为抗剪强度的0.45、0.65、0.85倍;在4种可控基质吸力(0、100、200、300 kPa)下参考陈氏加载法,按三应力水平分级加载开展非饱和压实土三轴剪切蠕变试验。试验结果表明:随着基质吸力的增加,其率敏性参数ρ 减小,其率敏性降低;随着基质吸力逐渐增大,其蠕变初始最大速率、稳定蠕变速率以及蠕变变形量均显著减小;蠕变试验确定的应变速率−应变关系线与率敏性试验获得的应变速率−应变数据点基本吻合,证明两者间存在一定时效对应关系,且随着基质吸力的增大,这种时效对应关系更显著。

关键词: 非饱和土, 土-水特征, 基质吸力, 超固结, 率敏性, 蠕变, 时效对应关系

Abstract: To study the long-term deformation after construction of high-filled soil under partial saturation, the rate sensitivity and creep tests of unsaturated compacted soil under controllable matric suction were carried out respectively, and the time-dependent corresponding relationship between them was analyzed. The rate-sensitivity tests used the triaxial shear method at different loading rates to analyze the effects of matric suction (0, 100, 200, and 300 kPa), loading rate (0.4 and 0.02 mm/min), and over-consolidation ratio (1, 4, and 8) on the strength and deformation characteristics of the soil. The 0.45, 0.65, and 0.85 times of shear strength are determined to be the third-order stress level loads of triaxial shear creep respectively. The triaxial shear creep tests of unsaturated compacted soil were carried out under four controllable matric suction forces (0, 100, 200, and 300 kPa), referring to the Chen loading method, and under three stress level graded loading. The results show that: 1) The rate sensitivity parameter ρ  of unsaturated compacted soil decreases with the increase of matrix suction, and its rate sensitivity also decreases. 2) With the increasing of matric suction, the initial maximum creep rate, stable creep rate and creep deformation of unsaturated compacted soil decrease significantly. 3) The strain rate-strain relationship line determined by the creep test is consistent with the strain rate-strain data points obtained by the rate sensitivity test, which proves that there is a certain time-dependent corresponding relationship between the rate sensitivity and creep, and this relationship becomes more significant with the increase of matrix suction. 

Key words: unsaturated soil, soil-water characteristics, matric suction, over-consolidation, rate sensitivity, creep, time-dependent correspondence

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 何冠, 姚仰平. 统一硬化模型与下加载面模型的理论关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 11-22.
[2] 陈勇, 苏剑, 曹玲, 王力, 王世梅, . 基于数据挖掘的土−水特征曲线演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 23-34.
[3] 袁俊平, 陈龙, 梁艳, 丁国权, 殷宗泽, . 对欠固结土的超固结比的探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 85-94.
[4] 秦爱芳, 孟红苹, 江良华. 电渗−堆载作用下非饱和土轴对称固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 97-106.
[5] 曾立峰, 邵龙潭, 郭晓霞, . 土中有效应力概念的起源与发展[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 127-144.
[6] 汪磊, 张立婷, 沈思东, 徐永福, 夏小和. 分段循环荷载作用下非饱和土轴对称固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 203-212.
[7] 翟张辉, 张亚国, 李同录, 肖书雄, . 考虑边界效应的非饱和土圆柱孔扩张问题解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 301-311.
[8] 邓波, 杨明辉, 王东星, 樊军伟, . 刚性挡墙后非饱和土破坏模式及主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2371-2382.
[9] 陈宾, 邓坚, 胡杰铭, 张建林, 张涛, . 钙质砂一维蠕变分形破碎特性宏微观试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1781-1790.
[10] 赵云, 杨忠方, 凌道盛, 陈鹏, 肖昭然, . 垃圾土中排水柱孔扩张问题弹塑性解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1825-1832.
[11] 王海曼, 倪万魁, 刘魁, . 延安压实黄土土−水特征曲线的快速预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1845-1853.
[12] 高游, 李泽, 孙德安, 于海浩, 陈波, . 考虑初始孔隙比影响的单/双峰土−水特征曲线 模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1441-1452.
[13] 冷伍明, 邓志龙, 徐方, 张期树, 董俊利, 刘思慧. 基于路基土蠕变效应的路基预应力损失模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1671-1682.
[14] 胡惠华, 贺建清, 聂士诚, . 洞庭湖砂纹淤泥质土一维固结蠕变模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1269-1276.
[15] 仉文岗, 顾鑫, 刘汉龙, 张青, 王林, 王鲁琦, . 基于贝叶斯更新的非饱和土坡参数概率 反演及变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .