岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 3003-3014.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2165

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

水泥偏高岭土复合稳定粉砂土渗透特性试验研究

王盛年1,高新群1, 2,吴志坚1,惠洪雷1,张兴瑾1   

  1. 1. 南京工业大学 交通运输工程学院,江苏 南京 211816;2. 华设设计集团股份有限公司,江苏 南京 210014
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-23 修回日期:2022-08-16 出版日期:2022-11-11 发布日期:2022-11-29
  • 作者简介:王盛年,男,1987年生,博士(后),副教授,主要从事于特殊岩土体静动力特性及工程应用方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金(No. 41902282);江苏省碳达峰碳中和科技创新专项资金(重大科技示范)(No. BE2022605);冻土工程国家重点实验室开放基金(No. SKLFSE201809)

Permeability characteristics of cemented silty sand improved by metakaolin

WANG Sheng-nian1, GAO Xin-qun1, 2, WU Zhi-jian1, HUI Hong-lei1, ZHANG Xing-jin1   

  1. 1. College of Transportation Science & Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211816, China; 2. China Design Group Co. Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu 210014, China
  • Received:2021-12-23 Revised:2022-08-16 Online:2022-11-11 Published:2022-11-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41902282), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Jiangsu Province (BE2022605) and the State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering ( SKLFSE201809).

摘要: 水泥稳定粉砂土抗渗性能受粉砂土自身渗透性能、水泥用量、水灰比等因素影响显著,如何在提升其抗渗性能的同时降低水泥用量是提升工程经济效益的关键。通过开展不同水泥偏高岭土掺比、初始用水量、水泥偏高岭土总掺量以及养护龄期条件下的室内渗透试验,研究了上述因素对水泥偏高岭土复合稳定粉砂土抗渗性能的影响规律,探讨了上述因素及无侧限抗压强度与渗透系数之间的经验关系。结果表明:水泥与偏高岭土掺比为5:1时,水泥偏高岭土复合稳定粉砂土抗渗性能最佳,且该掺比不随水泥偏高岭土总掺量的改变而变化;水泥偏高岭土复合稳定粉砂土渗透系数随初始用水量增加呈非线性递增,随水泥偏高岭土总掺量增加和养护龄期发展呈先快后慢降低;基于试验结果归纳提出了4个关于初始用水量、水泥偏高岭土总掺量、养护龄期和无侧限抗压强度的水泥偏高岭土复合稳定粉砂土渗透系数经验模型。研究成果可为水泥稳定粉砂土抗渗性能提升提供理论参考与借鉴。

关键词: 粉砂土, 水泥稳定, 偏高岭土, 抗渗性能, 经验公式

Abstract: The impermeability of cement-stabilized silty sand is significantly affected by the permeability of itself, the dosage of cement, the water-cement ratio, and other factors. How to improve the impermeability of cement-stabilized silty sand while reducing cement dosage is the key to improving the economic benefit of the project. In this study, a series of indoor permeability tests was conducted on cement-metakaolin stabilized silty sands with different cement-metakaolin ratios, initial water consumption, total cement-metakaolin contents, and curing ages. The influence of the above factors on the impermeability of cement-metakaolin stabilized silty sands were investigated, and the empirical relationships between the permeability coefficient and these factors as well as their corresponding unconfined compressive strength were discussed. The results showed that the impermeability of cement-metakaolin stabilized silty sands achieved the optimization when the ratio of cement to metakaolin was 5:1, and this mixing ratio did not change with the total cement-metakaolin content used in silty sand stabilization. The permeability coefficient of cement-metakaolin stabilized silty sands increased nonlinearly with the initial water consumption and decreased rapidly first and then slowly with the increase of the total cement-metakaolin content and curing age. Four empirical formulas for the permeability coefficient of cement-metakaolin stabilized silty sands were summarized with respect to initial water consumption, total cement-metakaolin content, curing age, and unconfined compressive strength. The results of this study can provide a theoretical reference for improving the impermeability of cement-stabilized silty sands.

Key words: silty sand, cement stabilization, metakaolin, impermeability, empirical formula

中图分类号: 

  • TU 441
[1] 贺桂成, 谢元辉, 李咏梅, 李春光, 唐孟媛, 张志军, 伍玲玲. 微生物胶结砂岩型铀矿砂的抗渗性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2504-2514.
[2] 熊雨, 邓华锋, 李建林, 程雷, 朱文羲. 火山灰增强微生物固化砂土效果的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3403-3415.
[3] 程坦, 郭保华, 孙杰豪, 田世轩, 孙崇轩, 陈岩, . 非规则砂岩节理剪切变形本构关系试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 51-64.
[4] 周恒宇, 王修山, 胡星星, 熊志奇, 张小元, . 地聚合物固化淤泥强度增长影响因素及机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2089-2098.
[5] 谈云志, 占少虎, 沈克军, 左清军, 明华军, . 处治红黏土团粒的表层硬化与粒间胶结效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 361-368.
[6] 谈云志, 占少虎, 胡焱, 曹玲, 邓永锋, 明华军, 沈克军, . 石灰-红黏土互损行为与偏高岭土减损机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 104-112.
[7] 谈云志, 胡焱, 曹玲, 邓永锋, 明华军, 沈克军, . 偏高岭土协同石灰钝化红黏土水敏性的机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2207-2214.
[8] 谈云志, 柯睿, 陈君廉, 吴军, 邓永锋. 偏高岭土增强石灰-水泥固化淤泥的耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1146-1152.
[9] 孙静, 公茂盛, 熊宏强, 甘霖睿, . 冻融循环对粉砂土动力特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 747-754.
[10] 谈云志, 胡焱, 邓永锋, 曹玲, 左清军, 明华军, . 偏高岭土协同石灰抑制红黏土收缩的行为与机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4213-4219.
[11] 郑进修,张建海,高克静. 地下厂房支护措施经验回归及支护强度判据[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 303-310.
[12] 刘金辉,李文枭,刘宇森,刘保国,. 多孔含水岩层的相似材料配比研究[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 657-664.
[13] 焦 峰,郭保华,翟明磊,. 砂土充填大理岩节理的剪切强度经验公式[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4102-4108.
[14] 杨 旭,孟英峰,李 皋,王 良,李 诚,. 一种确定各向异性单轴抗压强度的经验公式[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2655-2661.
[15] 王丽琴,邵生俊,鹿忠刚,. 物理性质对黄土初始结构性的综合影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3484-3490.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .