岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 361-368.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0208

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

处治红黏土团粒的表层硬化与粒间胶结效应

谈云志1, 2,占少虎1, 2,沈克军2,左清军1,明华军1   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 特殊土资源化利用宜昌市重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 宜昌鸿乾环保建材有限公司,湖北 宜昌 443100
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-16 修回日期:2020-12-11 出版日期:2021-02-10 发布日期:2021-02-09
  • 作者简介:谈云志,男,1979年生,博士,教授,主要从事特殊土方面的教学与科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51579137, No.51979150);湖北省优秀中青年科技创新团队计划项目(No.T201803)。

Effects of hardening and intergranular cementation on the surface of treated aggregate laterite

TAN Yun-zhi1, 2, ZHAN Shao-hu1, 2, SHEN Ke-jun2, ZUO Qing-jun1, MING Hua-jun1   

  1. 1. Yichang Key Laboratory of the Resources Utilization for Problematic Soils, China Three Georges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. Yichang Hongqian Environmental Building Materials Co. Ltd., Yichang, Hubei 443100, China
  • Received:2020-04-16 Revised:2020-12-11 Online:2021-02-10 Published:2021-02-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51579137, 51979150) and the Youth Innovation Team Project of Hubei Province (T201803).

摘要: 红黏土易成团,难以打散,用石灰等处治时,实际附着于团粒表面,造成内外混合不均匀。以两种团粒尺寸分布的红黏土( 5.0 mm和 0.5 mm)为研究对象,开展收缩、压缩和直接剪切等水-力特性试验,评价处治红黏土团粒表层的硬化与粒间胶结效应。研究表明,黏土的团粒尺寸、含水率和处治方式显著影响处治效果。与仅用石灰处治方式相比,偏高岭土-石灰联合处治的方式更好,其压缩性降低、黏聚力提高且收缩性减少;不过,红黏土的团粒尺寸大小也会影响处治效果,团粒尺寸大者的水-力性能改善效果不如尺寸小者。由此推测,经过处治后,红黏土团粒表层形成了“硬壳”,提高了团粒的抗压缩能力和表面粗糙度;团粒之间形成了胶结,抑制了其收缩行为,而且提高了黏聚力;但当团粒尺寸变大后,偏高岭土-石灰处治的影响范围局限于团粒表层,团粒尺寸效应削弱了偏高岭土-石灰的处治效果。

关键词: 红黏土, 团粒, 硬化, 胶结, 偏高岭土

Abstract: Laterite is prone to aggregate and difficult to disperse. When treated with lime, it actually adheres to the surface of aggregates in fact, resulting in inhomogeneous distribution inside and outside. In this study, two groups of laterite were selected with different aggregate sizes ( 5.0 mm and 0.5 mm). A series of mechanical and hydraulic properties tests, such as shrinkage test, compression test and direct shear test, were conducted, and the effects of hardening and intergranular cementation on the surface of treated laterite aggregates were evaluated. The results showed that aggregate size, initial water content, and treated method significantly affected the treating effect. Compared with the treatment with lime alone, the metakaolin-lime cooperation method was better, with reduced compressibility, increased cohesion and reduced shrinkage. However, the treatment effect was influenced by the aggregate sizes of laterite, and the improvement of mechanical and hydraulic properties of laterite declined with the increasement of aggregate size. Based on this, it can be inferred that after treatment, “hard shell” was formed on the surface of laterite aggregates, which improved the compressive resistance and surface roughness of the aggregate. Cementations were formed between aggregates, inhibiting the shrinkage behavior and improving the cohesion, but after aggregate size increased, the influence scope of metakaolin-lime was limited to the surface of aggregates, and the aggregate size effect counterbalanced the treatment effect of metakaolin-lime.

Key words: laterite, aggregate, hardening, cementation, metakaolin

中图分类号: 

  • TU 446
[1] 洪成雨, 杨强, 赵勇, 陈登伟, 喻伟. 基于光纤传感技术的土工格栅应变监测机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1755-1764.
[2] 陈昌富, 杜成, 朱世民, 何仕林, 张根宝, . 红黏土土层锚杆界面剪切应力松弛试验及其模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1201-1209.
[3] 李亚峰, 聂如松, 李元军, 冷伍明, 阮波, . 间歇性循环荷载下路基细粒土填料永久 变形特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1065-1077.
[4] 谈云志, 占少虎, 胡焱, 曹玲, 邓永锋, 明华军, 沈克军, . 石灰-红黏土互损行为与偏高岭土减损机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 104-112.
[5] 戴轩, 郭旺, 程雪松, 霍海峰, 刘国光, . 盾构隧道平行侧穿诱发的建筑纵向沉降 实测与模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 233-244.
[6] 孟庆彬, 王杰, 韩立军, 孙稳, 乔卫国, 王刚, . 极弱胶结岩石物理力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 19-29.
[7] 刘家顺, 靖洪文, 孟波, 王来贵, 张向东, 杨建军, . 含水条件下弱胶结软岩蠕变特性 及分数阶蠕变模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2609-2618.
[8] 谈云志, 胡焱, 曹玲, 邓永锋, 明华军, 沈克军, . 偏高岭土协同石灰钝化红黏土水敏性的机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2207-2214.
[9] 朱剑锋, 徐日庆, 罗战友, 潘斌杰, 饶春义, . 考虑固化剂掺量影响的镁质水泥固化土 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[10] 谈云志, 柯睿, 陈君廉, 吴军, 邓永锋. 偏高岭土增强石灰-水泥固化淤泥的耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1146-1152.
[11] 孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制 与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[12] 李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土 的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[13] 魏晓明, 郭利杰, 周小龙, 李长洪, 张立新, . 高阶段胶结充填体全时序应力演化规律 及预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3613-3620.
[14] 易雪枫, 刘春康, 王宇. 金属矿尾废胶结充填体破裂演化过程 原位CT扫描试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3365-3373.
[15] 刘波, 马永君, 盛海龙, 常雅儒, 于俊杰, 贾帅龙, . 白垩系红砂岩冻结融化后的力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 161-171.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[3] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[4] 黄润秋,徐德敏. 岩石(体)渗透性测试的体变量法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2961 -2964 .
[5] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[6] 刘 晓,唐辉明,罗红明,陈守义. 对滑坡防治工程相关规范中渗流问题的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3173 -3180 .
[7] 赵成刚,蔡国庆. 非饱和土广义有效应力原理[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3232 -3236 .
[8] 贾宇峰,迟世春,林 皋. 考虑颗粒破碎影响的粗粒土本构模型[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3261 -3266 .
[9] 周火垚,施建勇. 饱和软黏土中足尺静压桩挤土效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3291 -3296 .
[10] 刘小文,常立君,胡小荣. 非饱和红土基质吸力与含水率及密度关系试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3302 -3306 .