岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 233-244.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0763

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

盾构隧道平行侧穿诱发的建筑纵向沉降 实测与模拟分析

戴轩1,郭旺2,程雪松3,霍海峰1,刘国光1   

  1. 1. 中国民航大学 机场学院,天津 300300;2. 天津市市政工程设计研究院,天津 300392; 3. 天津大学 滨海土木工程结构与安全教育部重点试验室,天津 300072
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-05 修回日期:2020-09-22 出版日期:2021-01-11 发布日期:2021-01-07
  • 作者简介:戴轩,男,1988年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土工程等方面的教学和研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51808548);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(No. 3122018C017);天津市企业科技特派员项目(No. 20YDTPJC00750)。

Field measurement and numerical analysis for evaluating longitudinal settlement induced by shield tunneling parallel to building

DAI Xuan1, GUO Wang2, CHENG Xue-song3, HUO Hai-feng1, LIU Guo-guang1   

  1. 1. College of Airport Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China; 2. Tianjin Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute, Tianjin 300392, China; 3. MOE Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Received:2020-06-05 Revised:2020-09-22 Online:2021-01-11 Published:2021-01-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51808548), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3122018C017) and the Tianjin Technical Expert Project (20YDTPJC00750).

摘要: 当盾构隧道平行侧穿建筑物时,大多关注建筑物的横向沉降规律,对其纵向沉降关注较少。为此,针对盾构隧道平行侧穿建筑物引发的空间变形开展研究。首先,对天津地铁6号线平行侧穿四座结构形式相近的砖混建筑的实测数据进行分析,得到建筑物基本变形模式;基于工程实测并考虑土体的小应变硬化特性建立三维有限元数值分析模型,研究了盾构侧穿引发的建筑物纵向挠曲、土体变形与应力变化规律,并分析了不同建筑平面长宽比的影响。结果表明,盾构隧道平行侧穿将诱发平面长宽比较大的建筑出现“下凹式”挠曲变形,纵墙中部沉降最大可为其角点沉降的2倍,平行侧穿并不能简化为平面应变问题进行分析。建筑物修建和盾构开挖将导致隧道上方土体经历较为复杂的应力变化过程,并可划分为6个阶段。沿建筑纵向基础中部的土体与边缘土体相比,其首先经历更大的压缩变形(建筑施工导致),在盾构穿越后又产生了更大的卸荷变形。当建筑平面长宽比小于2时,盾构开挖导致的纵向挠曲变形将显著减小。

关键词: 盾构隧道, 侧穿, 建筑沉降, 有限元法, 小应变硬化模型

Abstract: The transverse settlement induced by the construction of a parallel shield tunnel alongside the building has raised considerable attention, whereas few studies focus on the longitudinal settlement. Therefore, the spatial deformation of ground developed from this tunneling form is investigated. In this study, some field measurements from the shield tunnel section of Tianjin Metro Line 6 parallel to four similar masonry buildings in vicinity are analyzed first, and the deformation pattern is established. Then, a hardening soil model calibrated against field measurement, considering small strain stiffness, is implemented in a three-dimension finite element simulation to evaluate the longitudinal deflection of the buildings, the ground deformation, and the soil stress distribution. Additionally, the effect of building aspect ratio is discussed. The simulation results show that tunneling-induced sagging deformation develops along the longitudinal direction of the building, and the settlement at the middle of a longitudinal wall is twice of that at the corners. Therefore, the study of tunneling parallel to buildings cannot be simplified to a plane strain problem. The building construction and tunneling activity result in the soil above the tunnel crown experiencing a complicated stress history, which can be divided into six stages. In longitudinal direction, compared with the part below the building foundation corners, the soil in the middle initially behaves larger compressive deformation due to building construction, followed by greater unloading deformation caused by tunnel excavation. In addition, the longitudinal sagging is significantly reduced for the buildings with aspect ratio less than 2.

Key words: shield tunneling, parallel tunneling, building settlement, finite element method (FEM), HS-Small model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 王翔南, 郝青硕, 喻葭临, 于玉贞, 吕禾. 基于扩展有限元法的大坝面板脱空三维模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 329-336.
[2] 薛阳, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 廖康, 张龙飞. 库水升降条件下考虑饱和渗透系数空间变异性的白水河滑坡渗流变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1709-1720.
[3] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[4] 江南, 黄林, 冯君, 张圣亮, 王铎, . 铁路悬索桥隧道式锚碇设计计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 999-1009.
[5] 杨振兴, 陈健, 孙振川, 游永锋, 周建军, 吕乾乾, . 泥水平衡盾构用海水泥浆的改性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 501-508.
[6] 魏纲, 张鑫海, 林心蓓, 华鑫欣, . 基坑开挖引起的旁侧盾构隧道横向受力变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 635-644.
[7] 陈佳莹, 滕竞成, 尹振宇, . 黏土中桶式基础的宏单元模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3823-3830.
[8] 侯公羽, 李子祥, 胡涛, 周天赐, 肖海林, . 用于隧道变形监测的分布式光纤定点式布设 监测误差测定研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3481-3490.
[9] 章定文, 刘志祥, 沈国根, 鄂俊宇, . 超大直径浅埋盾构隧道土压力实测分析 及其计算方法适用性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 91-98.
[10] 张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层 变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[11] 曹洪, 胡瑶, 骆冠勇. 滤管两端均不在含水层层面的承压不 完整井近似计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2774-2780.
[12] 黄大维, 周顺华, 冯青松, 罗锟, 雷晓燕, 许有俊, . 地表均布超载作用下盾构隧道上覆土层 竖向土压力转移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2213-2220.
[13] 莫振泽, 王梦恕, 李海波, 钱勇进, 罗跟东, 王辉, . 粉砂地层中浓泥土压盾构泥膜效应引起的 孔压变化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2257-2263.
[14] 王翔南, 李全明, 于玉贞, 喻葭临, 吕禾, . 基于扩展有限元法对土体滑坡破坏过程的模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2435-2442.
[15] 郑安兴, 罗先启, 陈振华, . 基于扩展有限元法的岩体水力劈裂耦合模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 799-808.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[3] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[4] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[5] 卢 正,姚海林,骆行文,胡梦玲. 公路交通荷载作用下分层地基的三维动响应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2965 -2970 .
[6] 李 磊,朱 伟 ,林 城,大木宜章. 干湿循环条件下固化污泥的物理稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3001 -3004 .
[7] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[8] 黄平路,陈从新,肖国峰,林 健. 复杂地质条件下矿山地下开采地表变形规律的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3020 -3024 .
[9] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[10] 陈 松,徐光黎,陈国金,吴雪婷. 三峡库区黄土坡滑坡滑带工程地质特征研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3048 -3052 .