岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 91-98.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2055

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

超大直径浅埋盾构隧道土压力实测分析 及其计算方法适用性评价

章定文1,刘志祥1,沈国根2,鄂俊宇2   

  1. 1. 东南大学 交通学院,江苏 南京 210096;2. 扬州市隧道管理处,江苏 扬州 225002
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-06 出版日期:2019-08-01 发布日期:2019-08-15
  • 作者简介:章定文,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事交通岩土工程和环境岩土工程方面的教学与科研工作
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省建设系统科技项目(No.2016ZD70)

Measurement of earth pressure of shallow buried tunnel with super large diameter and applicability evaluation of calculation method

ZHANG Ding-wen1, LIU Zhi-xiang1, SHEN Guo-gen2, E Jun-yu2   

  1. 1. School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China; 2. Tunnel Management Office of Yangzhou, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225002, China
  • Received:2018-11-06 Online:2019-08-01 Published:2019-08-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Construction System Science and Technology Project of Jiangsu Province (2016ZD70).

摘要: 以扬州瘦西湖隧道为工程依托,对超大直径盾构隧道管片荷载、结构内力等进行长期现场监测,分析超大直径浅埋盾构隧道土压力、管片钢筋应变的变化规律。采用上覆土柱法、太沙基松弛土压力法计算管片土压力理论计算值,并与现场实测结果对比,分析不同土压力计算方法在不同埋深条件下的适用范围。结果表明,盾构纠偏对隧道管片荷载大小、分布形式影响较大,且其影响一致持续至稳定期;盾构隧道施工结束后,作用在盾构管片上的土压力逐渐减小并趋于稳定;管片钢筋应变同土压力变化趋势基本一致,但进入稳定期时间略滞后于土压力,土压力进入稳定期后实测土压力值约为理论计算值的48%~60%;松弛土压力法计算的土压力值较上覆土柱法计算值和实测结果更为接近。研究成果可为盾构隧道管片设计荷载取值提供指导。

关键词: 超大直径浅埋盾构隧道, 土压力, 现场监测, 理论计算方法

Abstract: Based on the Yangzhou Shouxi lake tunnel, the load of segments and structural strain etc of shallow buried shield tunnels with super-large diameters were constantly monitored in the field. Variation rules of earth pressure, and the strain of steel bar were analyzed. Then, the theoretical earth pressures at the segment of the tunnel were calculated based on the overburden load method and Terzaghi’s earth pressure method. These theoretical results were compared with the measurement values, analyzing the applicability of different earth pressure calculation methods under different buried depths. The results show that shield rectification has a great impact on the value of tunnel segment load and its spatial distribution, and the impacts lasts until the stability period. The earth pressure on shield segments decreases and tends to be stable gradually after the construction of shield tunnel. The change trend of steel bars’ strain is basically the same as the earth pressure, but the former lags behind the latter for reaching the stable state. When the earth pressure reaches the stable state, the measured value is about 48%-60% of the theoretical value. The earth pressure value calculated by the Terzaghi’s earth pressure method is much closer to the measured value than that of the overburden load method. Thus, the study in this paper can provide guidance for the load design of shield tunnel segments.

Key words: super-large diameter and shallow shield tunnel, earth pressure, field monitoring, theoretical calculation methods

中图分类号: 

  • U452
[1] 陈建功, 杨扬, 陈彦含, 陈小兵. 考虑抗拉强度的黏性填土挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1829-1835.
[2] 喻昭晟, 陈晓斌, 张家生, 董亮, ABDOULKADER M S. 粗颗粒土的静止土压力系数非线性分析与计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1923-1932.
[3] 史永跃, 王奎华, 董天文, 马显春, 黄永威. 真空负压静力试桩方法关键技术试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1699-1708.
[4] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[5] 黄大维, 周顺华, 冯青松, 罗锟, 雷晓燕, 许有俊, . 地表均布超载作用下盾构隧道上覆土层 竖向土压力转移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2213-2220.
[6] 陈建旭, 宋文武, . 平动模式下挡土墙非极限主动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
[7] 汪大海, 贺少辉, 刘夏冰, 张嘉文, 姚文博. 地层渐进成拱对浅埋隧道上覆土压力影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2311-2322.
[8] 芮 瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈 成, 涂树杰. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙 主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[9] 邵生俊, 陈 菲, 邓国华, . 基于平面应变统一强度公式的结构性黄土填料 挡墙地震被动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1255-1262.
[10] 唐德琪, 俞 峰, 陈奕天, 刘念武, . 既有−新增排桩双层支挡结构开挖模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1039-1048.
[11] 刘 洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状 与主动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[12] 梁 波, 厉彦君, 凌学鹏, 赵宁雨, 张青松, . 离心模型试验中微型土压力盒土压力测定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 818-826.
[13] 张业勤, 陈保国, 孟庆达, 徐昕, . 减载条件下高填方涵洞受力机制及基底压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4813-4818.
[14] 吴红刚, 武志信, 谢显龙, 牌立芳, . 土质边坡微型桩组合结构大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3844-3854.
[15] 武志信, 吴红刚, 赖天文, 李玉瑞, 牌立芳, . 微型桩加固土质边坡的动土压力响应 及其频谱特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3909-3919.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!