岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 2284-2292.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0768

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

平动模式下挡土墙非极限主动土压力

陈建旭1, 2,宋文武1   

  1. 1. 西华大学 能源与动力工程学院,四川 成都 610039;2. 西昌学院 土木与水利工程学院,四川 西昌 615013
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-04 出版日期:2019-06-11 发布日期:2019-06-22
  • 通讯作者: 宋文武,男,1965年生,硕士,教授,主要从事水工结构及水力机械方面的研究。E-mail: wenwus@163.com E-mail:823934635@qq.com
  • 作者简介:陈建旭,男,1993年生,硕士研究生,主要从事挡土墙土压力的计算方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技厅项目(No.2016JY0187);四川省教育厅重大培育项目(No.14CZ0013)。

Non-limit active earth pressure for retaining wall under translational motion

CHEN Jian-xu1, 2, SONG Wen-wu1   

  1. School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610039, China; 2. School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Xichang University, Xichang, Sichuan 615013, China
  • Received:2018-05-04 Online:2019-06-11 Published:2019-06-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Projects of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province(2016JY0187) and the Major Training Project of Education Department of Sichuan Province(14CZ0013).

摘要: 针对平动模式下墙背倾斜的挡土墙,假定墙后所形成的土拱为圆弧形,建立位移同内摩擦角、外摩擦角的非线性函数,并考虑土层间剪应力作用,通过水平层分析法,得出了挡土墙平动模式下非极限主动土压力分布、合力、作用点高度的解答,其解析解与试验值较其他方法吻合得更好,验证了该方法的合理性。结果表明:是否考虑土层间剪应力,土压力的大小均随墙体位移的增大而减小,不会影响土压力合力大小,仅影响土压力的分布,且考虑剪应力作用的土压力在墙体上部较不考虑剪应力要小,下部反之。剪应力对土体起阻碍作用,随内摩擦角的增大,剪应力出现先显著增大后略微减小的状态;随外摩擦角、位移的增大,剪应力增大;随着墙背倾角的增大,剪应力先减小,再反向增大,土压力随之增大。同时考虑土拱效应与剪应力所得出的合力作用点高度介于仅考虑土拱效应与库仑解之间。

关键词: 平动模式, 非极限主动土压力, 土拱, 位移, 剪应力, 水平层分析法

Abstract: For inclined retaining walls under translational motion, the earth arch formed behind the wall is assumed arc-shaped. Nonlinear functions of displacement with internal and external friction angle, considering the interlayer shear stress, were established. The horizontal layer analysis method was used to obtain the solution of non-limit active earth pressure distribution, the total earth pressure, point of forces applied. The analytical solution and experimental values are in good agreement comparing to other methods. The results show that regardless of the inter-layer shear stress is considered or not, the magnitude of the earth pressure decreases as the wall displacement increases. The total of earth pressure does not change the magnitude but the distribution of earth pressure varies. The earth pressure considering the shear stress is less than the one in the upper part of the wall without considering the shear stress, and higher than the lower part. Shear stress acts as a hindrance to the soil, and it first increases significantly and then decreases slightly as the internal friction angle increases. Shear stress increases as the external friction angle and displacement increase. With the increase of the wall dorsal obliquity, the shear stress decreases first, then increases in the opposite direction, and the earth pressure increases accordingly. The height of the resultant force point considering the soil arching and shear stress together is between only considering the soil arching effect and the Coulomb solution.

Key words: mode of translation, non-limit active earth pressure, soil arch, displacement, shear stress, horizontal layer analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU432
[1] 赵久彬, 刘元雪, 何少其, 杨骏堂, 柏准, . 三峡库区阶跃变形滑坡水平位移与降雨量 数学统计模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 305-311.
[2] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[3] 刘克奇, 丁万涛, 陈瑞, 侯铭垒, . 盾构掌子面三维破坏模型构建与极限支护力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2293-2303.
[4] 王立安, 赵建昌, 余云燕, . 瑞利波在非均匀饱和地基中的传播特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1983-1990.
[5] 黄福云, 陈汉伦, 董锐, 单玉麟. 水平低周往复位移下单桩-土相互作用试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1625-1634.
[6] 田抒平, 高盟, 王滢, 陈青生. Duxseal隔振性能数值分析与现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1770-1780.
[7] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[8] 毕宗琦, 宫全美, 周顺华, 程茜, . 循环荷载下竖向土拱演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[9] 宋义敏, 张 悦, 许海亮, 王亚飞, 贺志杰. 基于非均匀特征的岩石蠕滑与黏滑变形演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 363-371.
[10] 黄宇华, 徐林荣, 周俊杰, 蔡雨, . 基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[11] 邓涛, 林聪煜, 柳志鹏, 黄明, 陈文菁, . 大位移条件下水平受荷单桩的简明弹塑性计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 95-102.
[12] 王忠凯, 徐光黎. 盾构掘进、离开施工阶段对地表变形的 影响范围及量化预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 285-294.
[13] 王体强, 王永志, 袁晓铭, 汤兆光, 王海, 段雪锋. 基于振动台试验的加速度积分位移方法可靠性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 565-573.
[14] 孔亮, 刘文卓, 袁庆盟, 董彤, . 常剪应力路径下含气砂土的三轴试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3319-3326.
[15] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 章涵, 周昌, 龚辉, . 嵌岩桩负摩阻力现场试验与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3610-3617.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!