饱和兰州黄土液化过程中孔压和应变发展的试验研究

›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 3464-3468.

饱和兰州黄土液化过程中孔压和应变发展的试验研究

孙海妹^{1, 2}，王兰民^{1, 2}，王平^{1, 2}，刘红玫^{1, 2}

1. 中国地震局地震预测研究所兰州基地，兰州 730000；2. 中国地震局兰州地震研究所，兰州 730000

收稿日期:2009-08-12 出版日期:2010-11-10 发布日期:2010-11-24
作者简介:孙海妹，女，1973年生，硕士，工程师，主要从事黄土动力学试验方面的研究。
基金资助:
中国地震局地震预测研究所基本科研业务费专项（No. 2009A22）资助。

Experimental study of development of strain and pore water pressure during liquefaction of saturated Lanzhou loess

SUN Hai-me i^{1, 2}，WANG Lan-ming ^{1, 2}，WANG Ping ^{1, 2}，LIU Hong-mei ^{1, 2}

1. Lanzhou Research Base of Earthquake Sciences, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 730000, China; 2. Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2009-08-12 Online:2010-11-10 Published:2010-11-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用WF12440型空心圆柱扭剪仪，用反压饱和法对初始饱和度较低的原状黄土进行饱和，进行室内原状黄土饱和液化试验研究，探讨了饱和兰州黄土液化过程中孔隙水压力、轴向应变、应力-应变滞回圈的发展规律。结果表明，对初始饱和度较低的原状黄土，反压饱和法使孔压系数B值达到0.95以上，即土样完全饱和；兰州黄土在均压固结条件下液化的孔压发展，开始时上升速率较缓慢，循环数一定后会出现孔压迅速增高的现象直至达到有效围压；应力-应变滞回特性随着振动次数的增加发生变化，塑性逐步增大；当轴向应变小于2%时，孔压增长缓慢；此后，孔压上升速率加大，3%应变可以出现在初始液化前；接近液化时偏应力为负值时的有效应力大于正值时的有效应力。

关键词: 黄土, 液化, 孔压, 应变, 试验研究

Abstract:

Using a dynamic hollow cylinder apparatus WF12440 as the test platform, this paper firstly studied the loess saturation by the back pressure method. The developments of pore water pressure, axial strain, deviatoric stress-axial strain curve during liquefaction are then investigated. Testing results indicate that the back pressure method can be successfully used for loess saturation; and the pore water pressure coefficient could achieve 0.95 and more. Under the condition of isotropic consolidation, pore water pressure increased slowly at the beginning; after several cycles the pore water pressure increased rapidly until it reached the effective consolidation pressure. The deviatoric stress-axial strain curve developed with the increase of cycles; and plastic strain increased step by step. When the axial strain was less than 2%, the pore water pressure increased slowly; afterwards, its increase ratio was much larger, and a strain of 3% could appear at the initial liquefaction process. Before liquefaction of the loess, the mean effective stress under negative deviatoric stress is larger than that under the positive deviatoric stress.

Key words: loess, liquefaction, pore water pressure, strain, experimental study

中图分类号:

TU 435

孙海妹，王兰民，王平，刘红玫. 饱和兰州黄土液化过程中孔压和应变发展的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3464-3468.

SUN Hai-mei，WANG Lan-ming，WANG Ping，LIU Hong-mei. Experimental study of development of strain and pore water pressure during liquefaction of saturated Lanzhou loess[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3464-3468.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[2]	刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 杨建军, 孙嘉宝, . 部分排水条件下饱和黏土渐近状态本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 485-491.
[3]	方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 王立平, 余永强, . 真三轴条件下非饱和黄土的有效应力屈服特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 492-500.
[4]	张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣, 申发义. 冻融循环下花岗岩剪切蠕变试验与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 509-519.
[5]	马维嘉, 陈国兴, 吴琪, . 复杂加载条件下珊瑚砂抗液化强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 535-542.
[6]	梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[7]	王刚, 韦林邑, 魏星, 张建民, . 压实黏土三轴压缩变形过程中的渗透性变化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 32-38.
[8]	熊辉, 杨丰, . 文克尔地基模型下液化土桩基水平振动响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 103-110.
[9]	赵晓彦, 万宇豪, 张肖兵. 汶马高速公路千枚岩堆积体岩块定向性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 175-184.
[10]	夏坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[11]	周家作, 韦昌富, 魏厚振, 杨周洁, 李力昕, 李彦龙, 丁根荣, . 多功能水合物沉积物三轴试验系统的研制与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 342-352.
[12]	何鹏飞, 马巍, 穆彦虎, 黄永庭, 董建华, . 黄土−砂浆块界面剪切特性试验及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 82-90.
[13]	李志成, 冯先导, 沈立龙, . 沉管隧道含垄沟卵石垫层变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 189-194.
[14]	刘华, 张硕成, 牛富俊, 邵珠山, 牛泽林, 鲁洁, . 酸碱污染Q3黄土的一维压缩特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 210-216.
[15]	刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed