›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 3425-3432.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2831

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Behavior of sand filled nodular piles under compression in soft soil areas

ZHOU Jia-jin1, GONG Xiao-nan1, YAN Tian-long3, ZHANG Ri-hong2, 3   

  1. 1. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. Faculty of Architectural, Civil Engineering and Environment, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China; 3. ZCONE High-tech Pile Industry Holdings Co., Ltd., Ningbo, Zhejiang 315000, China
  • Received:2016-12-02 Online:2018-09-11 Published:2018-10-08
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51578498, 51579217) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M611995)

Abstract: The geological properties of the soil are poor in soft soil areas, and the ultimate skin friction and tip resistance provided by the foundation soil are also limited in these areas. The material strength of the precast pile shaft can’t be fully mobilized in soft soil areas. Filling sand into the foundation soil in precast pile construction process can improve the properties of the foundation soil and promote the frictional capacity of the pile-soil interface as well. The compressive bearing capacity of pile foundation can then also be enhanced. A group of field tests as well as ABAQUS simulation are used to investigate the bearing capacity of the sand filled nodular pile. The following conclusions can be gained based on the measured and simulation results: the compressive bearing capacity of the sand filled nodular pile is obviously better than the compressive bearing capacity of the conventional pipe pile in soft soil areas; the axial force of the sand filled nodular pile decreases sharply at the nodes along the nodular pile, and the nodes along the nodular pile can promote the shaft bearing capacity of the pile foundation; the shaft bearing capacity of the sand filled nodular pile is much better than that of the conventional pipe pile in soft soil areas, and the enlarged shaft resistance coefficient is about 1.15-1.40.

Key words: nodular pile, sand filled, bearing capacity, ABAQUS, three-dimensional modeling

CLC Number: 

  • TU 473

[1] LI Chao, LI Tao, JING Guo-ye, XIAO Yu-hua, . Study on the ultimate bearing capacity of surrounding soil underlying gripper of shaft boring machine [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[2] ZHOU Qiang, LI Kang-ping, DUAN Ya-hui, CAO Zi-jun, LI Dian-qing, . Safety criteria for bearing capacity of foundation based on the generalized reliability ratio of safety margin [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[3] WU Xing-zheng, WANG Rui-kai, XIN Jun-xia, . Geometric reliability analysis of geotechnical structures at a specific site [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2070-2080.
[4] ZHAO Ming-hua, PENG Wen-zhe, YANG Chao-wei, XIAO Yao, LIU Ya-nan. Upper bound analysis of lateral bearing capacity of rigid piles in sloping ground [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[5] YANG Xue-xiang, JIAO Yuan-fa, YANG Yu-yi, . Development and test of aerated inflation controlled anchors [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[6] DAI Guo-liang, ZHU Wen-bo, GUO Jing, GONG Wei-ming, ZHAO Xue-liang, . Experiments on vertical uplift bearing capacity of suction caisson foundation in soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[7] WANG Qin-ke, MA Jian-lin, CHEN Wen-long, YANG Yan-xin, HU Zhong-bo, . Centrifugal model tests and calculation method of uplift bearing capacity of rock-socketed pedestal pile overburden soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[8] ZHANG Lei, WANG Ning-wei, JING Li-ping, FANG Chen, DONG Rui, . Comparative experiments of different electrode materials on electro-osmotic consolidation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3493-3501.
[9] ZHANG Yi-hu, WU Ai-qing, ZHOU Huo-ming, WANG Shuai, LUO Rong, FAN Lei. Review of bearing capacity and deformation characteristics of tunnel- type anchorage for suspension bridge [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3576-3584.
[10] YUAN Wei, LIU Shang-ge, NIE Qing-ke, WANG Wei, . An approach for determining the critical thickness of the karst cave roof at the bottom of socketed pile based on punch failure mode [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2789-2798.
[11] MU Rui, PU Shao-yun, HUANG Zhi-hong, LI Yong-hui, ZHENG Pei-xin, LIU Yang, LIU Ze, ZHENG Hong-chao, . Determination of ultimate bearing capacity of uplift piles in combined soil and rock masses [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[12] LI Shu-zhao, WANG Zhong-chang, JIA Xu, HE Lin-lin, . Simplified calculation method for cyclic bearing capacity of suction anchors with taut mooring in soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1704-1712.
[13] WANG Dong-yong, CHEN Xi, YU Yu-zhen, LÜ Yan-nan, . Ultimate bearing capacity analysis of shallow strip footing based on second- order cone programming optimized incremental loading finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4890-4896.
[14] LIU Qing-bin, PAN Mao, LIU Jie, GUO Yan-jun, ZHANG Xiao-shuang, YAO Jian-peng, LI Fang-yu, . Paraview visualization and virtual reality of output of finite element analysis in Abaqus [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4916-4924.
[15] FENG Jun, WANG Yang, ZHANG Yu-feng, HUANG Lin, HE Chang-jiang, WU Hong-gang, . Experimental comparison of anchorage performance between basalt fiber and steel bars [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!