Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 809-817.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2144

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analyses of restraint of surrounding rock and structural vibration characteristics of underground powerhouse for pumped storage power station

CUI Qi, HOU Jian-guo, SONG Yi-le   

  1. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2018-11-22 Online:2019-02-11 Published:2019-02-19

Abstract: To understand the restraint of surrounding rock, vibration characteristics and evaluation standard of underground powerhouse structure, field tests and finite element analyses were conducted on a large pumped storage power station by using an electric testing method, to achieve the modal and dynamic response of underground powerhouse structure. Four types of finite element model are established according to different constraints between the upstream and downstream sidewalls and surrounding rocks. By comparing the results of finite element modal calculation and field test, it is found that when calculating the finite element modal of the underground powerhouse structure of the pumped storage power station, the reasonable calculating condition is that the boundary node of the powerhouse sidewall contacts with the surrounding rock in the normal direction. The deformation modulus of surrounding rock is selected according to the third type of surrounding rock, and the deformation modulus and Poisson's ratio are 10 GPa and 0.25, respectively. The elastic modulus of concrete should be calculated according to the dynamic elastic modulus. Through the dynamic response test of underground powerhouse structure, the maximum displacement is observed when the power generation is started or shut, which indicates that the start-up and shutdown of power generation are the most disadvantageous vibration conditions of underground powerhouse structure in normal operation of the pumped storage power station. The vibration caused by the start-up and shutdown of the power plant does not affect the stability of surrounding rock of the underground powerhouse, and the surrounding rock of the underground powerhouse is in a safe state. The frequency of dynamic response is mainly low-frequency components such as 0.5, 0.75 and 8.25 Hz that may be from the fluctuating pressure in the draft tube or spiral case and the basic frequency or frequency doubling of the unit, which means the vibration response of the underground powerhouse structure is mainly caused by the flow fluctuation and the unit frequency. Based on the safety assessment and analysis of underground powerhouse structure, it is suggested that 0.2 and 0.8 mm should be used as the evaluation criteria for the vibration control of underground powerhouse floor under steady and transient conditions, respectively. The anti-vibration performance of underground powerhouse structure basically satisfies the safety requirements. The analyses of finite element calculation and vibration tests of modal and dynamic response not only make up for the deficiency of the vibration test, but also provide a reference for anti-vibration design and vibration safety evaluation of underground powerhouse structure for pumped storage power stations.

Key words: pumped storage power station, underground powerhouse structure, restraint of surrounding rock, modal, dynamic response, evaluation criterion

CLC Number: 

  • TU 435
[1] QIAO Xiang-jin, LIANG Qing-guo, CAO Xiao-ping, WANG Li-li, . Research on dynamic responses of the portal in bridge-tunnel connected system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[2] HE Jing-bin, FENG Zhong-ju, DONG Yun-xiu, HU Hai-bo, LIU Chuang, GUO Sui-zhu, ZHANG Cong, WU Min, WANG Zhen, . Dynamic response of pile foundation under pile-soil-fault coupling effect in meizoseismal area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[3] REN Yang, LI Tian-bin, LAI Lin. Centrifugal shaking table test on dynamic response characteristics of tunnel entrance slope in strong earthquake area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[4] WANG Li-an, ZHAO Jian-chang, HOU Xiao-qiang, LIU Sheng-wei, WANG Zuo-wei. Lamb problem for non-homogeneous saturated half-space [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1790-1798.
[5] FENG Li, DING Xuan-ming, WANG Cheng-long, CHEN Zhi-xiong. Shaking table model test on seismic responses of utility tunnel with joint [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[6] LU Wei, ZHAO Dong, LI Dong-bo, MAO Xiao-fei. Analytical method for dynamic response of fully grouted anchorage system of rammed earth sites [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[7] ZHANG Heng-yuan, QIAN De-ling, SHEN Chao, DAI Qi-quan. Experimental investigation on dynamic response of pile group foundation on liquefiable ground subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[8] WU Qi, DING Xuan-ming, CHEN Zhi-xiong, CHEN Yu-min, PENG Yu, . Seismic response of pile-soil-structure in coral sand under different earthquake intensities [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[9] XIA Kun, DONG Lin, PU Xiao-wu, LI Lu. Earthquake response characteristics of loess tableland [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[10] YU Yi-fan, WANG Ping, WANG Hui-juan, XU Shu-ya, GUO Hai-tao, . Physical model test of seismic dynamic response to accumulative landslide [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[11] YANG Wen-bo, ZOU Tao, TU Jiu-lin, GU Xiao-xu, LIU Yu-chen, YAN Qi-xiang, HE Chuan. Analysis of dynamic response of horseshoe cross-section tunnel under vibrating load induced by high-speed train [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3635-3644.
[12] LU Jun-long, ZHANG Yin, . Experimental study of the seismic response of the assembled multi-ribbed wall structure-subsoil system in frequency domain [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2163-2171.
[13] JIANG Li-Chun, LUO En-Min, SHEN Bin-Bin, . A dynamic response of blasting to stereoscopic goaf group based on the multi-degree of freedom model method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2407-2415.
[14] SHI Li, WANG Hui-ping, SUN Hong-lei, PAN Xiao-dong, . Approximate analytical solution on vibrations of saturated ground induced by pile foundations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1750-1760.
[15] XIONG Zhong-ming, ZHANG Chao, CHEN Xuan. Model test on ground motion parameters of site with fissures under seismic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 421-428.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!