Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 2485-2494.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1596

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dynamic response and effect of loading rate of soil under impact loading

LIU Yong-jian1, 2, FU Yang-pan2, LAI Ming-yang2, 3, LI Zhang-ming2, FANG Hao-yuan2, XIE Zhi-kun2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou Institute of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510040, China; 2. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China; 3. Guangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Research Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China
  • Received:2022-10-14 Accepted:2022-11-16 Online:2023-09-11 Published:2023-09-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078142) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2021A1515011691, 2022A151011047, 2020A1515010811).

Abstract: To study the dynamic response characteristics of soil under impact load, flat dynamic load tests (FDLT) with different load levels and loading rates were carried out on two typical soils (sand and clay) in Guangzhou University Town by using the self-developed additional excitation force-type FDLT system, obtaining three characteristic curves of load-time curve, displacement-time curve, and load-displacement curve, establishing the empirical formula of dynamic deformation modulus and loading rate, and comparing the effects of loading rate of the two soils under impact load. It shows that: (1) There is a threshold of charging voltage in the FDLT test of sand. During the impact test on this threshold, the loading rate has a great effect on the dynamic strength and deformation of sand, while it has no obvious effect on clay under the same conditions. (2) The same point of the loading rate on the displacement response of clay and sand is that the maximum load and maximum displacement of the two soils both increase with the increase of loading rate. The difference is that the time for clay to reach the peak displacement increases with the increase of loading rate while the time for sand to reach the peak displacement shows a pattern of increasing and then decreasing with the increase of loading rate. (3) The dynamic deformation modulus varies logarithmically with the loading rate. The results can provide a reference for soil dynamic characteristics study, dynamic and static parameter conversion and engineering design.

Key words: loading rates, flat dynamic load test, impact load, dynamic parameters

CLC Number: 

  • TU413.5
[1] JIANG Ming-gui, SUN Wei, LI Jin-xin, FAN Kai, LIU Zeng, . Analysis of fracture characteristics and energy consumption of full tailings cemented backfill under impact load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(增刊): 186-196.
[2] WANG Lei, ZHANG Shuai, LIU Huai-qian, CHEN Li-peng, ZHU Chuan-qi, LI Shao-bo, WANG An-cheng. Research on energy dissipation and damage failure law of gas-bearing coal under impact loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(7): 1901-1915.
[3] RAN Long-zhou, YUAN Song, WANG Xi-bao, WANG Zheng-zheng, ZHANG Sheng, . A method for calculating rockfall impact load on shed tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1748-1760.
[4] HOU Yong-qiang, YIN Sheng-hua, YANG Shi-xing, ZHANG Min-zhe, LIU Hong-bin, . Mechanical response and energy damage evolution process of cemented backfill under impact loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S1): 145-156.
[5] ZHONG Zi-lan, SHI Yue-bo, LI Jin-qiang, ZHAO Mi, DU Xiu-li. Stochastic seismic response analysis of engineering site considering correlations of critical soil dynamic parameters [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(7): 2015-2024.
[6] YAO Yu-wen, LIU Fang-cheng, BU Guo-bin, JING Li-ping, . Laboratory study on elastic dynamic mechanics of rubber-sand mixture by bender-extender element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2369-2379.
[7] LIU Xin-yu, ZHANG Xian-wei, YUE Hao-zhen, KONG Ling-wei, XU Chao, . SHPB tests on dynamic impact behavior of granite residual soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[8] XU Dong-sheng, HUANG Ming, HUANG Fo-guang, CHEN Cheng. Failure behavior of cemented coral sand with different gradations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1531-1539.
[9] ZHOU En-quan, ZONG Zhi-xin, WANG Qiong, LU Jian-fei, ZUO Xi. Dynamic characteristics of pipe buried in rubber-silt lightweight mixtures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1388-1395.
[10] XIAO Xiao-chun, DING Xin, ZHAO Xin, PAN Yi-shan, WANG Ai-wen, WANG Lei,. Experimental study on acoustic emission and charge signals during coal failure process at different loading rates [J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3419-3426.
[11] LIU Cheng-yu, LIU Han-qing, HUANG Zhen . Analysis of surrounding rock anisotropy based on measured seismic wave velocity——A case study of Tingzhou Tunnel in Ganzhou-Longyan Railway [J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1451-1457.
[12] XU Xiao-li , GAO Feng , ZHANG Zhi-zhen , CHEN Lin, . Experimental study of the effect of loading rates on mechanical properties of granite at real-time high temperature [J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2184-2192.
[13] LIN Wei-di,LI Zhang-ming,LUO Zhi-bin. Mechanical responses of muck under triaxial impact loading [J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1966-1972.
[14] LUO Zhou-quan ,CHEN Jie ,XIE Cheng-yu ,WANG Wei ,LIU Xiao-ming,. Mechanism of impact-induced damage of main chute and its experimental validation [J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1744-1751.
[15] SONG Yi-min,HE Ai-jun,WANG Ze-jun,CHEN Hao-zhe. Experiment study of the dynamic fractures of rock under impact loading [J]. , 2015, 36(4): 965-970.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XU Jin-ming, QIANG Pei, ZHANG Peng-fei. Texture analysis of photographs of silty clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] XIANG Tian-bing, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui, JIANG Quan, ZHANG Chuan-qing. Rock failure mechanism and true triaxial experimental study of specimens with single structural plane under three-dimensional stress[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] SHI Yu-ling, MEN Yu-ming, PENG Jian-bing, HUANG Qiang-bing, LIU Hong-jia. Damage test study of different types structures of bridge decks by ground-fissure[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] XIA Dong-zhou, HE Yi-bin, LIU Jian-hua. Study of damping property and seismic action effect for soil-structure dynamic interaction system[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] ZHANG Qi-yi. Study of failure patterns of foundation under combined loading[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] YI Jun, JIANG Yong-dong, XUAN Xue-fu, LUO Yun, ZHANG Yu. A liquid-solid dynamic coupling modelof ultrasound enhanced coalbed gas desorption and flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] TAO Gan-qiang, YANG Shi-jiao, REN Feng-yu. Experimental research on granular flow characters of caved ore and rock[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .