›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 988-994.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.04.011

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A method to calculate the active earth pressure with considering soil arching effect under the nonlimit state of clayey soil

LOU Pei-jie1, 2   

  1. 1.School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China; 2. Center for Post-doctoral Studies of Civil Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China
  • Received:2013-11-25 Online:2015-04-11 Published:2018-06-13

Abstract: The active earth pressure depends largely upon the inclining angle and the displacement of a retaining wall backfilled, for either sandy or clayey soil. Thus, it is necessary to address these factors in calculating the active earth pressure of the retaining wall backfilled by the nonlimit-state soil. Based on stress state analysis, the coefficient of lateral earth pressure is determined by considering the soil arching effect and the nonlimit soil state, and a closed form solution is given for the inclined retaining wall using the horizontal element method. The proposed method is validated by comparing the calculated results with model testing results. The key parameters, such as displacement ratio ?, the ratio of soil-wall friction angle and internal friction angle ? /?, inclining angel ?, and cohesion c, are analyzed, which have great influences on the distribution of the active earth pressure and the height of the acting point of the sum of the total earth pressure. It is shown that as the soil state transits from static to actively pushing the wall, the soil arching effect becomes stronger. Also, as ? /? increases, the distribution of the active earth pressure becomes more and more nonlinear and the height of the acting point of total earth pressure increases, while the effect of ? /? on the earth pressure increases as ? increases. In addition, as ? increase, the soil arching effect diminishes. For the cohesive soil, the cohesion has influence on the active earth pressure, and the height of the acting point of total earth pressure decreases as the cohesion increases. The proposed method may help improve the calculation of active earth pressure behind the retaining wall.

Key words: soil arching effect, active earth pressure, nonlimit state, retaining wall

CLC Number: 

  • TU 432
[1] HUANG Yu-hua, XU Lin-rong, ZHOU Jun-jie, CAI Yu, . Calculation of pile-soil stress in pile-net composite foundation based on improved Terzarghi method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[2] ZHAO Xiao-yan, FAN Yu-fei, LIU Liang, JIANG Chu-sheng, . Model test on potential failure surface characteristics of railway stepped reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2108-2118.
[3] CHEN Jian-xu, SONG Wen-wu, . Non-limit active earth pressure for retaining wall under translational motion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
[4] RUI Rui, YE Yu-qiu, CHEN Cheng, TU Shu-jie. Nonlinear distribution of active earth pressure on retaining wall considering wall-soil friction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[5] XU Peng, JIANG Guan-lu, LEI Tao, LIU Qi, WANG Zhi-meng, LIU Yong, . Calculation of seismic displacement of reinforced soil retaining walls considering backfill strength [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1841-1846.
[6] CHEN Zheng, HE Ping, YAN Du-min, GAO Hong-jie, . A method to calculate rational spacing between pipes in pipe roofs considering soil arching effects [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1993-2000.
[7] XU Peng , JIANG Guan-lu , WANG Xun, HUANG Hao-wei , HUANG Zhe, WANG Zhi-meng, . Centrifuge model tests on influence of facing on reinforced soil retaining walls [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1427-1432.
[8] XU Peng, JIANG Guan-lu, QIU Jun-jie, GAO Ze-fei, WANG Zhi-meng, . Shaking table tests on reinforced soil retaining walls with full-height rigid facing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 998-1004.
[9] WANG Jia-quan, ZHANG Liang-liang, LAI Yi, LU Meng-liang, YE Bin, . Large-scale model tests on static and dynamic mechanical characteristics of reinforced earth retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[10] LIU Yang, YU Peng-qiang. Analysis of soil arch and active earth pressure on translating rigid retaining walls [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[11] WANG Jia-quan, XU Liang-jie, HUANG Shi-bin, LIU Zheng-quan. Bearing capacity analysis of geogrid reinforced abutment retaining wall under dynamic load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4220-4228.
[12] ZHANG Xiao-xi, HE Si-ming, FAN Xiao-yi, . Seismic stability of L-shape retaining walls and determination method of sliding surface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 4011-4020.
[13] ZHENG Jun-jie, LÜ Si-qi, CAO Wen-zhao, JING Dan, . Numerical simulation of composite rigid-flexible pile-supported retaining wall under the action of high-filled expansive soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 395-402.
[14] LI Zhao-hua, HU Jie, FENG Ji-li, GONG Wen-jun. Numerical simulation of debris flow based on visco-elastoplastic constitutive model [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 513-520.
[15] YIN Zhi-qiang, SHE Cheng-xue, YAO Hai-lin, LU Zheng, LUO Xing-wen,. Research on earth pressure behind row piles from clayey backfill considering soil arching effect [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 131-139.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] WU Zhen-jun,WANG Shui-lin,TANG Hua,WANG Wei,GE Xiu-run. A new optimization approach for slope reliability analysis[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 713 -718 .
[2] WANG Cheng,XU Hao,ZHENG Ying-ren. Study of safety factor of tunnel close to pile foundation[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 260 -264 .
[3] LI Xin-ping, DAI Yi-fei, LIU Jin-huan, ZENG Ming , LIU Li-sheng, ZHANGKai-g. Test study and numerical simulation analysis of explosion in steel tubes[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 5 -9 .
[4] CAO Wen-gui,ZHAO Heng,ZHANG Yong-jie,ZHANG Ling. Strain softening and hardening damage constitutive model for rock considering effect of volume change and its parameters determination method[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 647 -654 .
[5] WANG Ying-ming, LI Xiao-lun. Introduction to treatment of collapsible loess subgrade for Shaanxi section of Zhengzhou-Xi’an passenger dedicated railway line[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 283 -286 .
[6] HUANG Xiao-lan , YANG Chun-he , CHEN Feng , LI Yin-ping , LI Ying-fang. Tightness evaluation test on underground energy storage in bedded salt rock formation of Qianjiang area[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1473 -1478 .
[7] XU Fu-le ,WANG En-yuan ,SONG Da-zhao ,SONG Xiao-yan ,WEI Ming-yao. Long-range correlation and multifractal distribution of acoustic emission of coal-rock[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 2111 -2116 .
[8] NIU Lei, YAO Yang-ping, CUI Wen-jie, WAN Zheng. Three-dimensional method for constitutive relationship of overconsolidation unsaturated soil[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2341 -2345 .
[9] ZHANG An-bing , GAO Jing-xiang , ZHANG Zhao-jiang. Deformation analysis and prediction of building above old mine goaf based on multiscale method[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2423 -2428 .
[10] HSIAO Fu-yuan , WANG Chien-li , SHAO How-jei. Mechanical parameters estimation and tunnel deformation study for brittle rock under high overburden condition[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 109 -114 .