›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 428-434.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.02.016

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Limit analysis of plastic critical depth of retaining wall under sliding displacement mode

LIU Jie1, 2, HUANG Da1, ZHAO Fei3, YANG Chao1, SUN Sha4, 2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, Hebei 056038, China; 3. Southwest Pipeline Branch, Petro China Company Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; 4. Department of Mechanics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
  • Received:2015-01-09 Online:2017-02-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41472245, 41602301, 51378169, 51508150).

Abstract: The distribution and value of lateral earth pressure are closely related to the displacement mode of retaining wall. The critical depth of plastic zone behind the retaining wall should be considered during design when the backfill is in active earth pressure state. Based on the upper bound method of limit analysis, the infinitesimal backfill body under elastic overburden and adjacent wall are studied to determine the external work rate and internal energy dissipation rate. The equations are obtained to calculate the critical depth of plastic zone under sliding mode, considering the effect of displacement direction of the retaining wall. The results show that Rankine and other theories are special cases of the recommended method. The critical depth of plastic zone increases with the increase of the angle between the displacement direction of wall and the horizontal plane, and with the increase of the values of cohesion and friction angle of wall-soil interface and the values of cohesion and friction angle of backfill. However, when the wall displaces horizontally, the critical depth of plastic zone becomes constant regardless of the change of friction angle of wall-soil interface.

Key words: retaining wall, critical depth, sliding mode, limit analysis

CLC Number: 

  • TU 432

[1] LIU Ke-qi, DING Wan-tao, CHEN Rui, HOU Ming-lei. Construction of three-dimensional failure model of shield tunnel face and calculation of the limit supporting force [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2293-2303.
[2] CHEN Jian-gong, YANG Yang, CHEN Yan-han, CHEN Xiao-bing. Calculation of active earth pressure of cohesive soil behind retaining wall considering soil tensile strength [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1829-1835.
[3] SUN Lai-bin, XIAO Shi-guo, . Evaluation method for elastic foundation coefficient of finite downslope soil against loading segment of stabilizing piles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[4] LIU Shun-qing, HUANG Xian-wen, ZHOU Ai-zhao, CAI GUO-jun, JIANG Peng-ming, . A stability analysis method of soil-rock slope based on random block stone model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[5] YUAN Wei, LIU Shang-ge, NIE Qing-ke, WANG Wei, . An approach for determining the critical thickness of the karst cave roof at the bottom of socketed pile based on punch failure mode [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2789-2798.
[6] ZHAO Xiao-yan, FAN Yu-fei, LIU Liang, JIANG Chu-sheng, . Model test on potential failure surface characteristics of railway stepped reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2108-2118.
[7] CHEN Zheng, HE Ping, YAN Du-min, GAO Hong-jie, NIE Ao-xiang, . Upper-bound limit analysis of tunnel face stability under advanced support [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[8] RUI Rui, YE Yu-qiu, CHEN Cheng, TU Shu-jie. Nonlinear distribution of active earth pressure on retaining wall considering wall-soil friction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[9] XU Peng, JIANG Guan-lu, LEI Tao, LIU Qi, WANG Zhi-meng, LIU Yong, . Calculation of seismic displacement of reinforced soil retaining walls considering backfill strength [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1841-1846.
[10] XU Peng , JIANG Guan-lu , WANG Xun, HUANG Hao-wei , HUANG Zhe, WANG Zhi-meng, . Centrifuge model tests on influence of facing on reinforced soil retaining walls [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1427-1432.
[11] XU Peng, JIANG Guan-lu, QIU Jun-jie, GAO Ze-fei, WANG Zhi-meng, . Shaking table tests on reinforced soil retaining walls with full-height rigid facing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 998-1004.
[12] WANG Jia-quan, ZHANG Liang-liang, LAI Yi, LU Meng-liang, YE Bin, . Large-scale model tests on static and dynamic mechanical characteristics of reinforced earth retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[13] WANG Zhen, CAO Lan-zhu, WANG Dong, . Evaluation on upper limit of heterogeneous slope stability [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 737-742.
[14] FENG Ling-yun, ZHU Bin, DAI Jia-lin, KONG De-qiong, . Modelling lateral pipe-soil interaction on soft clay using large displacement sequential limit analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4907-4915.
[15] WANG Jia-quan, XU Liang-jie, HUANG Shi-bin, LIU Zheng-quan. Bearing capacity analysis of geogrid reinforced abutment retaining wall under dynamic load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4220-4228.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!