Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 179-186.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0658

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Experimental study on seismic behaviour of reinforced soil flexible abutment composite structures

XU Chao, LUO Min-min, REN Fei-fan, SHEN Pan-pan, YANG Zi-fan   

  1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2019-04-10 Revised:2019-09-11 Online:2020-06-19 Published:2020-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Project of Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology(2016YFE0105800).

Abstract: Geosynthetics reinforced soil flexible abutment composite structure, as a new technology, can realise the integrated design and construction for bridges. However, the literature on the seismic performance of this structure is very limited. This paper is to study the seismic performance of a scaled model of geosynthetic reinforced soil abutment structure by the shaking table test. Experimental results showed that the geosynthetic reinforced soil abutment structure had excellent seismic performance, which could maintain great global stability under strong earthquakes until the peak ground acceleration reached 1.0g. There was only a small camber deformation found at the top of the abutment, and the maximum deformation was around 2% of the abutment height. The slight differential settlement was also observed at the bridgehead. Due to the directionality and asymmetry of the seismic excitation, the inertial forces pointing to the free surface of the abutments on both sides were different. The bridge beam could transfer and coordinate the inertial forces of the nearby reinforced soil and made it approximately equal. In addition, reducing the reinforcement spacing was beneficial to improving the seismic performance of the geosynthetic reinforced soil abutment, which was mainly manifested in minimising the structural deformation and distributing the axial forces of reinforcements.

Key words: reinforced soil, geosynthetic reinforced soil(GRS), flexible abutment, shaking table test, seismic performance

CLC Number: 

  • TU 411.93
[1] LI Li-hua, YU Xiao-ting, XIAO Heng-lin, MA Qiang, LIU Yi-ming, YANG Xing, . Mechanical properties of reinforcement about rice husk ash mixed soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[2] XU Cheng-shun, DOU Peng-fei, DU Xiu-li, CHEN Su, HAN Jun-yan, . Study on solid-liquid phase transition characteristics of saturated sand based on large shaking table test on free field [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[3] YANG Chang-wei, TONG Xin-hao, WANG Dong, TAN Xin-rong, GUO Xue-yan, CAO Li-cong, . Shaking table test of dynamic response law of subgrade with ballast track under earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2215-2223.
[4] QIAO Xiang-jin, LIANG Qing-guo, CAO Xiao-ping, WANG Li-li, . Research on dynamic responses of the portal in bridge-tunnel connected system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[5] HE Jing-bin, FENG Zhong-ju, DONG Yun-xiu, HU Hai-bo, LIU Chuang, GUO Sui-zhu, ZHANG Cong, WU Min, WANG Zhen, . Dynamic response of pile foundation under pile-soil-fault coupling effect in meizoseismal area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[6] REN Yang, LI Tian-bin, LAI Lin. Centrifugal shaking table test on dynamic response characteristics of tunnel entrance slope in strong earthquake area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[7] HAN Jun-yan, LI Man-jun, ZHONG Zi-lan, XU Jing-shu, LI Li-yun, LAN Jing-yan, DU Xiu-li. Seismic response of soil under non-uniform excitation based on shaking table test of buried pipelines [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[8] ZHANG Lu-ming, ZHOU Yong, FAN Gang, CAI Hong-yu, DONG Yun. Seismic behavior research and reinforcement effect evaluation of composite retaining structures with nuclear safety level anti-dip layered soft rock slope under strong earthquakes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[9] PAN Dan-guang, CHENG Ye, CHEN Qing-jun. Shaking table test of the effect of underground shopping mall structure on ground motion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[10] LI Ping, ZHANG Yu-dong, BO Tao, GU Jun-ru, ZHU Sheng. Study of ground motion effect of trapezoidal valley site based on centrifuge shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
[11] FENG Li, DING Xuan-ming, WANG Cheng-long, CHEN Zhi-xiong. Shaking table model test on seismic responses of utility tunnel with joint [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[12] ZHANG Heng-yuan, QIAN De-ling, SHEN Chao, DAI Qi-quan. Experimental investigation on dynamic response of pile group foundation on liquefiable ground subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[13] WU Qi, DING Xuan-ming, CHEN Zhi-xiong, CHEN Yu-min, PENG Yu, . Seismic response of pile-soil-structure in coral sand under different earthquake intensities [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[14] XIA Kun, DONG Lin, PU Xiao-wu, LI Lu. Earthquake response characteristics of loess tableland [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[15] WANG Ti-qiang, WANG Yong-zhi, YUAN Xiao-ming, TANG Zhao-guang, WANG Hai, DUAN Xue-feng. Reliability analysis of acceleration integral displacement method based on shaking table tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 565-573.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!