岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 3467-3478.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1174CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.1174

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于Mindlin解的路基边坡滑面应力状态求解方法及应用

陈怀林1,杨涛1,张哲1,吴红刚2, 3,饶云康1, 4,滕汉卿1,李兮扬1   

  1. 1.西南交通大学 极端环境岩土和隧道工程智能建养全国重点实验室,四川 成都 610031;2.中铁西北科学研究院有限公司,甘肃 兰州 730000;3.中铁科学研究院集团有限公司,四川 成都 610032;4.三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-01 接受日期:2026-03-30 出版日期:2026-10-10 发布日期:2026-10-08
  • 通讯作者: 杨涛,男,1973年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程等方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: yangtao@swjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈怀林,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的科研工作。E-mail: Chenhuailin@my.swjtu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    四川省自然科学基金(No.2025ZNSFSC0305);甘肃省技术创新引导计划——企业研发机构能力建设专项(No.23CXJA0011);中国中铁股份有限公司科技研究开发计划(No.2022-重大专项-07)。

Solution method and application for stress state of slip surface in subgrade slopes based on Mindlin solution

CHEN Huai-lin1, YANG Tao1, ZHANG Zhe1, WU Hong-gang2, 3, RAO Yun-kang1, 4, TENG Han-qing1, LI Xi-yang1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Maintenance for Geotechnical and Tunnel Engineering under Extreme Environments, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. China Northwest Research Institute Co., Ltd., of CREC, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; 3. China Railway Academy Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610032, China; 4. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2025-11-01 Accepted:2026-03-30 Online:2026-10-10 Published:2026-10-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2025ZNSFSC0305), the Gansu Province Technology Innovation Guidance Plan—Special Funding for Capacity Building of Enterprise R&D Institutions (23CXJA0011) and the Science and Technology Research and Development Plan of China Railway Co., Ltd. (2022-Major Project-07).

摘要: 滑面应力状态的求解是路基边坡稳定性分析的核心问题。为推进滑面应力解析方法在工程中的应用,提出了一种基于弹性半空间应力叠加的路基边坡滑面应力求解方法。该方法假设坡面为弹性半空间的边界,通过叠加地基应力和坡面假设抗力产生的附加应力(Mindlin解)计算坡体内任意一点的应力状态,基于此可求解出滑面应力。此外,还介绍了一种滑面应力测试模型试验方法。在此基础上,设置了两个具有潜在滑面的算例边坡,对比分析了本文解析方法、模型试验方法获取的滑面应力,验证了解析方法的合理性。同时,提出了基于滑面应力解析解的稳定性系数计算方法,并挖掘了其工程应用价值。研究结果如下:算例计算结果显示,本文所提出的解析方法与模型试验结果基本吻合。统计学分析结果也显示,两种方法对应正应力和剪应力的相关性均大于0.5,相关系数检验的概率p值大于0.05,说明二者具有较强的相关性且差异性不显著;本文的稳定性系数计算方法可以同时获取局部稳定性系数与整体稳定性系数,既能反映滑坡的整体稳定性,也能够较好地揭示潜在滑坡的失稳破坏模式。本文提出的理论计算方法基于明确的应力叠加原理,编程实现便捷,不仅扩展了均质路基边坡应力状态的解析计算框架,其核心思路也为向更复杂工况的拓展提供了明确路径,为路基边坡的稳定性评价与失稳机制分析提供了一种新的解析工具。

关键词: 路基边坡, 应力状态, Mindlin解, 模型试验, 统计分析, 局部稳定性系数

Abstract: Solving the stress state of the slip surface constitutes the core issue in the stability analysis of subgrade slopes. To facilitate the engineering application of analytical methods for slip surface stress, this study introduces a methodology for determining slip surface stress in subgrade slopes, grounded in the stress superposition principle within an elastic semi-infinite space. This approach treats the slope surface as the boundary of an elastic semi-infinite space and computes the stress state at any point within the slope body by the hypothetical resistive force acting on the slope surface (derived from the Mindlin solution). Based on this framework, the slip surface stress can be determined accordingly. Furthermore, this study introduces a model test method for measuring slip surface stress. Building upon this, two example slopes with potential slip surfaces were designed. The slip surface stresses obtained from the analytical method and the model test method were comparatively analyzed to verify the rationality of the analytical method. Concurrently, a calculation method for the stability coefficient based on the analytical solution of slip surface stress was proposed, and its engineering application value was explored. The research findings are as follows: Example calculations show that the proposed analytical method aligns fundamentally with model test results. Statistical analysis indicates that the correlation coefficients for normal stress and shear stress between both methods exceed 0.5, with the p-values of the correlation coefficient tests greater than 0.05, demonstrating a strong correlation and insignificant differences. The proposed stability coefficient method enables the simultaneous determination of local stability coefficients and global stability coefficients, reflecting both the overall landslide stability and the failure mechanism of potential landslides. Based on the explicit principle of stress superposition and facilitated by straightforward programming implementation, the proposed theoretical calculation method not only extends the existing analytical framework for stress calculation in homogeneous subgrade slopes, but also provides a clear pathway for its extension to more complex conditions. It offers a novel analytical tool for both stability evaluation and failure mechanism analysis of subgrade slopes.

Key words: subgrade slopes, stress state, Mindlin solution, model test, statistical analysis, local safety factor

中图分类号: U213.1+3
[1] 冯双喜, 卜天浩, 雷华阳, 邢道润, 张国庆, 李建楷. 真空预压-辐射式电渗方法处理污染淤泥脱水与重金属Cu剔除机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2653-2664.
[2] 奚旺, 赵勇, 冯世进, . 不同运行模式下能源桩桩土热响应长周期演变规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2697-2708.
[3] 曹一凡, 黄强兵, 余根荣, 余岱金, 朱媛媛, 于超. 降雨与堆载作用下堆积体滑坡失稳机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2748-2760.
[4] 张辉, 徐珂, 张志镇, 王志民, 钱子维, 郑鹏麟, 强剑力, 梁景瑞, 张禹. 库车坳陷强挤压地层岩石破裂准则与裂缝发育度评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2461-2474.
[5] 孟宇涵, 郑秀坤, 王慧, 徐鹏, 李婷, 杨广庆, 张君, 刘林贵. 地震作用方向对多级加筋边坡水平加速度响应特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2360-2366.
[6] 李玉涛, 周汉, 李丽华, 李泽升, 刘瑛, 李林林. 土工合成材料加筋边坡抗水力冲刷特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 2028-2040.
[7] 杨瑞, 干飞, 王寿红, 郑刚, 李美霖, 王宏, 毕靖, 吴立城, 刘彪, 张元胤. 卸荷桩板挡墙力学性能及工作机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1672-1685.
[8] 李世豪, 刘杰, 王锋, 雷兵兵, 王斌. 冻融循环下土工格室加筋土挡墙水热力响应机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1713-1727.
[9] 刘佳奇, 张碧川, 冯增朝, 李学成, 郭纪哲. 实时高温循环加卸载下花岗岩双轴力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1553-1566.
[10] 张昕, 张茹梦, 刘晨, 刘思宇, 郭博文. 循环荷载作用下螺旋锚桩动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1147-1159.
[11] 潘泓, 黄才穆, 骆冠勇, 彭斯格, 刘荣照, 曹洪. 富水复合砂层突涌破坏行为及孔压响应特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1171-1182.
[12] 刘红帅, 丁泊文, 宋东松, 李羿, 王永志. 柔性叠层剪切箱在干砂场地离心试验中的边界效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1219-1228.
[13] 杨俊鹏, 段晓沛, 张倩, 李博文, 汪益敏. 降雨条件下加筋改良软岩残积土排水性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 882-892.
[14] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[15] 陈勇, 杨晓东, 贺元源, 王力, . 干湿循环与往返渗流协同诱发消落带土体损伤与浅层破坏的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(10): 3439-3251.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!