岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1306-1316.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1412

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

强震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应规律试验研究

郭明珠1,谷坤生1,张合2,孙海龙1,王晨1,刘晃1   

  1. 1. 北京工业大学 城市建设学部,北京 100124;2. 河北省地震局,河北 石家庄 050001
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-22 修回日期:2022-01-19 出版日期:2022-05-11 发布日期:2022-05-02
  • 通讯作者: 谷坤生,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩质斜坡动力响应的研究。E-mail: guks@emails.bjut.edu.cn E-mail:gmz@bjut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:郭明珠,男,1963年生,博士,教授,从事防灾减灾工程与防护工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发项目(No. 2018YFC1505001)。

Experimental study of dynamic response law of bedding rock slope with weak interlayer under strong earthquake

GUO Ming-zhu1, GU Kun-sheng1, ZHANG He2, SUN Hai-long1, WANG Chen1, LIU Huang1   

  1. 1. Department of Urban Construction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. Hebei Provincial Seismological Bureau, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050001, China
  • Received:2021-08-22 Revised:2022-01-19 Online:2022-05-11 Published:2022-05-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFC1505001)

摘要: 青藏高原东南三江流域沿江分布着数以万计的古滑坡和潜在滑坡,对在建的川藏铁路构成严重的威胁。通过振动台模型试验研究了强震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡的动力响应规律。分析不同地震动参数、输入波类型和软弱结构面对斜坡动力响应规律的影响。试验结果表明:斜坡的自振频率随着输入地震波次数的增加而逐渐降低,振动强度为0.3g和0.6g是斜坡启裂和失稳的临界动力条件。斜坡具有明显的高程效应,加速度放大系数沿坡表呈现先增加、后减小、再增加的趋势,在1/4坡高和坡顶处较大。坡内竖直向加速度放大系数随高程增加呈现线性增加的趋势。频率对斜坡动力放大响应影响较大。斜坡对低频地震波的放大效应不明显,甚至有抑制作用。随着频率的增加,斜坡的动力放大效应越来越明显。随着幅值的增加,斜坡加速度放大系数呈现先增大后减小的趋势,在振动强度为0.3g~0.4g时达到最大值。不同类型地震波作用下,斜坡对天然波的放大作用高于人工合成波。软弱夹层的存在使输入的地震波出现了明显的放大,并通过快速傅里叶变换(fast Fourier transform,简称FFT)发现,软弱夹层的位置对输入地震波的频段的敏感程度不同。该试验揭示了含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡在强震作用下的动力响应规律,为进一步研究此类斜坡的失稳破坏机制和防治提供了依据。

关键词: 振动台试验, 顺层岩质斜坡, 软弱夹层, 动力响应

Abstract: Tens of thousands of ancient landslides and potential landslides are distributed along the Three-rivers basin in the southeast of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, posing a severe threat to the Sichuan-Tibet railway under construction. A shaking table model test was performed to study the dynamic response of bedding rock slope with weak interlayer under strong earthquake. The influences of different ground motion parameters, input wave types, and weak interlayer on slope dynamic response were analysed. The test results show that the natural frequency of the slope decreases gradually with the increase of the number of input seismic waves, and the vibration intensities of 0.3g and 0.6g are the critical dynamic conditions for crack initiation and instability of the slope. There is an obvious elevation effect on the slope, and the acceleration amplification factor increases first, then decreases, finally increases along the slope surface, and is larger at 1/4 of the slope height and the top of the slope. The vertical acceleration amplification factor inside the slope increases linearly with elevation. The frequency has a great impact on the dynamic amplification response of the slope. The slope does not significantly amplify low-frequency seismic waves, and even inhibit them. With the increase of frequency, the dynamic amplification effect of slope becomes more and more prominent. As the amplitude increases, the acceleration amplification factor firstly increases and then decreases, finally reaches the maximum value at the vibration intensities of 0.3g–0.4g. Under the excitation of different types of seismic waves, the amplifying effect of slope on natural waves is higher than that on synthetic waves. The existence of a weak interlayer amplifies the input seismic wave markedly, and the fast Fourier transform (FFT) shows that the sensitivity of positions of the weak interlayer to frequency bands of input seismic waves differs. This experiment reveals the dynamic response law of bedding rock slope with weak interlayer under strong earthquake action and provides a basis for further study on the failure mechanism and prevention of slope.

Key words: shaking table test, bedding rock slope, weak interlayer, dynamic response

中图分类号: TU 458+.4
[1] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[2] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[3] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[4] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[5] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[6] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[7] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[8] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[9] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[10] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[11] 王智德, 司莹莹, 李杰, 钱梦凡, 安佳兴, . 低应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩的动力响应规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1762.
[12] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[13] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
[14] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[15] 王滢, 赵彩清, 王海萍, . 隧道内爆炸荷载作用下衬砌及周围非饱和土的动力响应解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1026-1038.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!