›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 2489-2495.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.09.008

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

水泥土应力-应变特性真三轴试验研究

宋新江1,徐海波1,周文渊1,王 伟2   

  1. 1. 安徽省(水利部淮河水利委员会)水利科学研究院,安徽 蚌埠 233000;2. 绍兴文理学院 土木工程系,浙江 绍兴 312000
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-03 出版日期:2016-09-12 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:宋新江,男,1970年生,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程和水泥土工程特性试验研究。
  • 基金资助:

    水利部公益性行业科研专项(No.201401022);安徽省自然科学基金项目(No.1408085ME99);国家自然科学基金青年基金(No.41202222);住房和城乡建设部研究开发项目(No.2015-k4-003,No.2016-k5-008)。

True triaxial test on stress-strain characteristics of cement-soil

SONG Xin-jiang1, XU Hai-bo1, ZHOU Wen-yuan1, WANG Wei2   

  1. 1. Anhui and Huaihe River Water Resources Research Institute, Bengbu 233000, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China
  • Received:2016-03-03 Online:2016-09-12 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This research was supported by the Special Fund for Water-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201401022), the National Natural Science Foundation of Anhui (1408085ME99), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41202222), and the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China (2015-k4-003, 2016-k5-008).

摘要: 采用研制的真三轴仪对水泥土进行等小主应力 、等中主应力参数b真三轴试验,研究中主应力参数、小主应力对水泥土应力-应变特性的影响。试验结果表明,相同?3条件下,水泥土应力-应变曲线的初始切线模量、破坏强度均随b的增大而增加,破坏时的大主应变则随b值的增大而减小;水泥土破坏强度与中主应力参数b近似呈线性关系,直线斜率随?3的增加而增大。对于相同b值,水泥土的应力-应变曲线初始切线模量、破坏强度、破坏时的大主应变均随?3的增加而增大;水泥土破坏强度与?3近似呈线性关系,且随b值的增大,线性关系更加明显。随着中主应力和?3的增大,水泥土应力-应变曲线逐渐由软化型向硬化型过渡。破坏应力比则随?3的增加和b值的增加而逐渐降低。获得了水泥土的广义Tresca准则和广义Mises准则模型参数,对比分析表明广义Tresca准则更适用于水泥土。

关键词: 水泥土, 真三轴试验, 中主应力, 破坏准则, 强度

Abstract: To investigate the influence of intermediate principal stress factor b and minor principal stress on stress-strain characteristics of cement-soil, true triaxial tests are conducted under the conditions of constant minor principal stress ?3 and intermediate principal stress factor b. The results show that both the initial tangent modulus and the peak strength of cement-soil have positive correlation with b; however, the correlation between major principal strain at failure state and b is opposite. What’s more, there is a linear relationship between the peak strength and b, and the straight slope increases with the minor principal stress. For the same value of b, the initial tangent modulus, the peak strength and the major principal strain of cement-soil increase with increasing minor principal stress. The peak strength linearly rises with confining pressure as b is increased. The stress-strain curve changes gradually from softening type to hardening type, along with the increasing of confining pressure and intermediate principal stress. Failure stress ratio becomes lower due to the increased ?3 and intermediate principal stress factor b. Finally, the parameters of the generalized Mises yield criterion and the generalized Tresca yield criterion are obtained. Comparative analysis shows that the former criterion is superior to the latter criterion to describe the mechanical behavior of the cement-soil.

Key words: cement-soil, true triaxial test, intermediate principal stress, failure criteria, strength

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411

[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 桂跃, 吴承坤, 赵振兴, 刘声钧, 刘锐, 张秋敏. 微生物分解有机质作用对泥炭土工程性质的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 147-155.
[3] 郑方, 邵生俊, 佘芳涛, 袁浩, . 重塑黄土在不同基质吸力下的真三轴剪切试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 156-162.
[4] 刘杰, 杨玉婳, 姚海林, 卢正, 岳婵, . 基于不同改性方法的分散性黏土处治试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[5] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[6] 李丽华, 余肖婷, 肖衡林, 马强, 刘一鸣, 杨 星, . 稻壳灰加筋土力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[7] 高玮, 胡承杰, 贺天阳, 陈新, 周聪, 崔爽, . 基于统计强度理论的破裂岩体本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[8] 袁庆盟, 孔亮, 赵亚鹏, . 考虑水合物填充和胶结效应的深海能源土 弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2304-2312.
[9] 陈昊, 胡小荣. 非饱和土三剪强度准则及验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2380-2388.
[10] 吴再海, 纪洪广, 姜海强, 齐兆军, 寇云鹏, . 尾砂胶结含盐冻结充填体力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1874-1880.
[11] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[12] 刘新宇, 张先伟, 岳好真, 孔令伟, 徐超, . 花岗岩残积土动态冲击性能的SHPB试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[13] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[14] 刘海峰, 朱长歧, 汪稔, 王新志, 崔翔, 王天民, . 礁灰岩-混凝土界面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1540-1548.
[15] 谈云志, 柯睿, 陈君廉, 吴军, 邓永锋. 碱溶液预降解淤泥有机质的效果与机制讨论[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1567-1572.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!