›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S2): 301-308.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.037

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

复合改性水玻璃加固黄土微观特征研究

吴朱敏1, 2,吕擎峰2,王生新3   

  1. 1. 上海协力岩土工程勘察有限公司,上海 200060;2. 兰州大学 西部灾害与环境力学教育部重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000; 3. 甘肃省科学院 地质自然灾害防治研究所,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-18 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:吴朱敏,男,1988年生,硕士,助理工程师,主要从事岩土工程方面的工作
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省科技支撑计划项目(No.1011FKCA093)

Microstructure of loess reinforced by compositely modified sodium silicate

WU Zhu-min1, 2, LÜ Qing-feng2, WANG Sheng-xin3   

  1. 1. Shanghai Xieli Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200060, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Western Disaster and Environment Mechanics of Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; 3. Geological Hazards Research and Prevention Institute, Gansu Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2016-06-18 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Gansu Province Science and Technology Support Program (1011FKCA093).

摘要: 进行压汞试验和SEM-EDS试验研究复合改性前后水玻璃加固黄土,分析其孔隙分布特征、颗粒和孔隙形态以及胶结物形态和化学元素含量,探讨宏观力学特性与微观特征的联系。压汞测试结果表明,改性前后加固黄土具有相近的孔隙分布特征,入口孔径主要分布在0.06~8 ?m之间,大、中、小和微孔隙分界值分别为8、2、0.06 ?m,加固时生成的凝胶填充作用不显著。SEM-EDS测试结果表明,改性后黄土仍保持其粒状、架空、接触-胶结结构不变,但加入硅酸钾材料后黄土颗粒表面变得粗糙并吸附有絮状物,EDS数据显示K元素含量随着硅酸钾掺入量的增加而增大,且试样无侧限强度与K元素百分含量正相关。研究还表明,土的颗粒联结强度和结构形态特征是导致黄土宏观力学性质差异的本质原因,在复合改性水玻璃加固黄土时在保持黄土架空孔隙基本不变的前提下,生成的含K凝胶在改变颗粒表面形态的同时强化了骨架颗粒之间的连接强度,从而改善了土体的强度。

关键词: 黄土, 水玻璃, 硅酸钾, 压汞试验, SEM-EDS试验, 胶结

Abstract: Silicification is one of the chemical methods of collapsible loess treatments. Sodium silicate is modified by potassium silicate for better reinforced effect. The mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive spectrometer tests (SEM-EDS) are performed on the loess specimens reinforced by compound modified sodium silicate. The microscopic characteristics, such as the entrance pore size distributions, particles' morphology and chemical composition, are carried out. Meanwhile, the relationship between microstructure, chemical composition and macroscopic mechanical behavior is also discussed. Based on the results of MIP, similar entrance pore size distributions, the dual-porosity structure, were found in both modified and unmodified reinforced loess specimens. And the entrance pore size distribution ranges from 0.06 to 8 ?m. According to the decreasing size, the pores can be labeled as large, medium, small and micro-pore, among which the three critical values are 8, 2 and 0.06 ?m, respectively. Moreover, gel-filled effect can be observed if reinforced effect is not significant. The results of SEM-EDS tests show that loess specimens retain granular, trellis pores, contact-cement microstructure after modification. The surface of loess particles became rough and floc was adsorbed after adding potassium silicate material. The EDS data represents that the K element content increases with the increasing of incorporation of potassium silicate. And the unconfined strength of specimens is positively correlated with the percentage of K element. It is also shown that connection strength of soil particles and the structure morphology are the main factors of the macroscopic mechanical properties of loess. The mechanism of loess reinforcement by compound modified sodium silicate is reinforcement of the bond strength of cement in microstructure and formation of three-dimensional networks of frame.

Key words: loess, sodium silicate, potassium silicate, mercury intrusion porosimetry, SEM-EDS test, cementation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 444
[1] 孟庆彬, 王杰, 韩立军, 孙稳, 乔卫国, 王刚, . 极弱胶结岩石物理力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 19-29.
[2] 郑方, 邵生俊, 佘芳涛, 袁浩, . 重塑黄土在不同基质吸力下的真三轴剪切试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 156-162.
[3] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, 邓国华. 人工合成类废布料纤维纱加筋黄土力学变形性质及抗溅蚀特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 394-403.
[4] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[5] 温馨, 胡志平, 张勋, 柴少波, 吕新波, . 基于Green-Ampt模型的饱和−非饱和黄土入渗 改进模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1991-2000.
[6] 荣驰, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 张铮, 张毅, 张庆艳, 刘奇, . 新型水玻璃−酯类注浆材料及其固沙体特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2034-2042.
[7] 牛庚, 邵龙潭, 孙德安, 韦昌富, 郭晓霞, 徐华. 土−水特征曲线测量过程中孔隙分布的演化规律探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1195-1202.
[8] 方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 余永强, 李震, 林志斌, . 真三轴条件下的原状黄土增湿变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1235-1246.
[9] 刘华, 何江涛, 赵茜, 王铁行, 郭超翊, . 酸污染原状黄土渗透微观特征演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 765-772.
[10] 孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制 与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[11] 方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 王立平, 余永强, . 真三轴条件下非饱和黄土的有效应力屈服特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 492-500.
[12] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[13] 雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[14] 何鹏飞, 马巍, 穆彦虎, 黄永庭, 董建华, . 黄土−砂浆块界面剪切特性试验及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 82-90.
[15] 刘波, 马永君, 盛海龙, 常雅儒, 于俊杰, 贾帅龙, . 白垩系红砂岩冻结融化后的力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 161-171.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!