›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 4133-4141.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0619

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

轴对称主动土压力问题的滑移线解

闫澍旺1, 2,李 嘉1, 2,闫 玥1, 2,郎瑞卿1, 2,纪玉诚1, 2   

  1. 1. 天津大学 水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室,天津 300072;2. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300072
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-06 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 李嘉,男,1986年生,博士研究生,主要从事软土的工程性质方面的研究。E-mail: li_jia@tju.edu.cn E-mail:yanshuwang@tju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:闫澍旺,男,1950年生,硕士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事软土的工程性质方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(No. 51709198);天津市自然科学基金(No. 16JCQNJC07900,No. 13JCZDJC35300)。

A solution for axisymmetric active earth pressure by slip line method

YAN Shu-wang1, 2, LI Jia1, 2, YAN Yue1, 2, LANG Rui-qing1, 2, JI Yu-cheng1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Received:2017-04-06 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51709198), the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin (16JCQNJC07900, 13JCZDJC35300).

摘要: 地基中竖向孔支护结构的设计需要以其所受主动土压力为依据,为此常需计算竖向孔开挖后孔壁主动土压力。含竖向圆孔地基是轴对称问题,基于平面应变假设的经典朗肯土压力理论或库仑土压力理论显然不适用,而现有求解轴对称条件下主动土压力方法多采用完全塑性假定或其他假定环向应力与大主应力之比(环向压应力系数?)为常数的方法,理论上不够严谨且误差较大。建立轴对称问题滑移线方程,采用使主动土压力为最大的目标的方法,采用迭代法求解环向压应力系数?,分析了?受土体参数和轴对称竖向孔几何参数影响规律,进而求解轴对称竖向孔孔壁主动土压力的精确值,理论上更为严谨,结果更为合理,并对比平面应变条件下的土压力结果,总结了轴对称条件下主动土压力的规律。

关键词: 轴对称竖向孔, 主动土压力, 滑移线法, 环向应力系数

Abstract: Design of vertical hole supporting structure in foundation should be based on its active earth pressure. So it is often necessary to calculate the active earth pressure on the hole wall after excavation of vertical holes. The foundation containing vertical hole is a typical axisymmetric problem, the traditional Rankine or Coulomb solution which is based on plane strain assumption is inapplicable, the existing methods for axisymmetric active earth pressure often presume the ratio of earth pressure and the major principal stress (tangential stress coefficient ?) is constant, such as Harr-Von Karman hypothesis and other similar methods, this assumption is not rigorous in theory and the calculated results have large enough error. In this paper, the slip line field equations for axisymmetric problem are established, the method of maximizing the active earth pressure and the iterative method are used to solve the circumferential compressive stress coefficient the ?, the effects of soil parameters and vertical hole geometry parameters on ? are analyzed, then the accurate value of active earth pressure can be determined. This method is more rigorous in theory and the result is more reasonable compared to that under plane strain assumption condition.

Key words: axisymmetric vertical hole, active earth pressure, slip line, tangential stress coefficient

中图分类号: 

  • TU432
[1] 陈建功, 杨扬, 陈彦含, 陈小兵. 考虑抗拉强度的黏性填土挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1829-1835.
[2] 陈建旭, 宋文武, . 平动模式下挡土墙非极限主动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
[3] 刘 洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状 与主动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[4] 刘美麟,侯艳娟,张顶立,房 倩. 砂土地层中考虑基坑施工效应的柔性挡墙主动土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 149-158.
[5] 杨 贵,王阳阳,刘彦辰, . 基于曲线滑裂面的挡墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2182-2188.
[6] 杨明辉,戴夏斌,赵明华,罗 宏. 曲线滑裂面下有限宽度填土主动土压力计算[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2029-2035.
[7] 骆 晗,李荣建,刘军定,霍旭挺,张 真,孙 萍,. 基于联合强度的黄土主动土压力公式与计算比较[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2080-2086.
[8] 张 健,王新征,胡瑞林,. 无限倾斜填土非竖直墙背条件下地震主动土压力计算[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1069-1074.
[9] 刘忠玉,陈 捷,李东阳,. 考虑剪应力作用的刚性挡土墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2443-2450.
[10] 王闫超,晏鄂川,陆文博,丛 璐,朱存金,李兴明,叶世伟. 无黏性有限土体主动土压力解析解[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2513-2520.
[11] 岳树桥,左人宇,陆 钊,. 相邻基坑有限宽度土条主动土压力的计算[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 2063-2069.
[12] 陈建功,周廷强,胡日成, . 柔性支护结构主动土压力的变分计算方法研究[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3365-3370.
[13] 朱建明,林庆涛,高晓将,高林生,. 临近地下室外墙影响下的挡土墙空间土压力研究[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3417-3426.
[14] 陈建功 ,徐晓核 ,张海权 , . 一般条件下主动土压力的变分求解[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 310-314.
[15] 王仕传,孙本杰,邵 艳. 改进的主动土压力计算方法[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1375-1379.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!