›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (S1): 496-700.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S1.061

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    

土变形模量的柔性承载板测试研究

许年春1,吴同情1,2,冯桥木1,汪 魁2,邵伟峰2   

  1. 1. 重庆科技学院 建筑工程学院,重庆 401331;2. 重庆交通大学 水利水运工程教育部重点实验室,重庆 400074
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-14 出版日期:2017-06-22 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 吴同情,男,1982年生,硕士,讲师,主要从事岩土力学方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail:wutongq@163.com。 E-mail:351601872@qq.com
  • 作者简介:许年春,男,1977年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土力学参数现场测试技术研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51609027);重庆市基础与前沿研究计划项目(No.cstc2015jcyjA30002,No.cstc2015jcyjA30003);重庆市城乡建设委员会资助项目(城科字2011第(84)号);国家内河航道整治工程技术研究中心暨水利水运工程教育部重点实验室开放基金资助项目(No.SLK2014B02)。

Research on flexible bearing plate test for deformation modulus of soil

XU Nian-chun1, WU Tong-qing1, 2, FENG Qiao-mu1, WANG Kui2, SHAO Wei-feng2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chongqing University of Science & Technology, Chongqing 401331, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Hydraulic & Waterway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
  • Received:2017-03-14 Online:2017-06-22 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51609027).the Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology (cstc2015jcyjA30002, cstc2015jcyjA30003), the Chongqing Municipal Commission of Urban-Rural Development (2011-84), and the national Engineering Research Center for Inland Waterway Regulation & Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Waterway Engineering of the Ministry of Education of Chongqing Jiaotong University(SLK2014B02).

摘要: 目前平板载荷试验(PLT)所用的承载板均为刚性承载板,无法考虑板底压力实际分布,测试出的地基土变形模量 存在一定的偏差。为实现板底均匀加载,在刚性承载板下加装气囊,研制出一种适用于PLT的柔性承载板。采用柔性承载板测试时,气囊内部变形量由电感式位移传感器测出,各级载荷值由合力P与囊内气压p同时控制。室内对比试验结果表明,刚性承载板测试出的 比柔性承载板测试出的 偏大14.0%,有限元模拟同样也表明刚性承载板测试出的 偏大10%以上,采用柔性承载板可得到 的准确值。研究认为土体变形模量的柔性承载板测试法具有可行性和先进性,成本及效率方面完全可以接受。

关键词: 变形模量, 柔性承载板, 平板载荷试验, 试验研究

Abstract: At present, all bearing plates used in plate loading test(PLT) are rigid, which leads to a certain error in deformation modulus of the foundation soil due to without considering the actual distribution of the compressive stress under the plates. In order to realize a uniform load under the plate, a flexible bearing plate has been invented through the installation of an air bag under the traditional rigid bearing plate and has been proved applicable for PLT. During the PLT using the flexible bearing plate, the internal deformation of the air bag can be measured with the help of the inductance meter and the self-made sensor; and the load value at all levels is controlled by the resultant P and the air pressure p simultaneously. The indoor comparative test results show that the tested using the rigid bearing plate is about 14.0% larger than ones by using flexible bearing plate. The finite element method simulation also shows that the tested using the rigid load bearing plate is at least 10% larger than ones using the flexible load bearing plate; and an accurate can be get using the flexible bearing plate. So it can be concluded that the testing method for the foundation soils deformation modulus using flexible bearing plate is feasible and advanced; and the cost and efficiency can be fully accepted.

Key words: deformation modulus, flexible bearing plate, plate loading test, experimental study

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443

[1] 周翠英, 梁彦豪, 刘春辉, 刘镇, . 天然红层风化土成膜试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 132-138.
[2] 杨钊, 乔春生, 陈松. 基于蒙特卡罗法的岩体变形模量统计 特征及参数权重分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 271-278.
[3] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, 邓国华. 人工合成类废布料纤维纱加筋黄土力学变形性质及抗溅蚀特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 394-403.
[4] 张庆艳, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 刘奇, 荣驰, . 断层破碎带突水突泥演化特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1911-1922.
[5] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣, 申发义. 冻融循环下花岗岩剪切蠕变试验与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 509-519.
[6] 赵晓彦, 万宇豪, 张肖兵. 汶马高速公路千枚岩堆积体岩块定向性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 175-184.
[7] 李志成, 冯先导, 沈立龙, . 沉管隧道含垄沟卵石垫层变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 189-194.
[8] 周 辉, 郑 俊, 胡大伟, 张传庆, 卢景景, 高 阳, 张旺, . 碳酸性水环境下隧洞衬砌结构劣化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2469-2477.
[9] 刘维宁, 姜博龙, 马蒙, 高健, . 周期性排桩设计频段隔振原理性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4138-4148.
[10] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 江宗斌, 张广涛. 化学腐蚀-冻融综合作用下岩石损伤蠕变 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3879-3888.
[11] 刘 钟, 张楚福, 张 义, 吕美东, 许国平, 陈天雄, . 囊式扩体锚杆在宁波地区的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 295-301.
[12] 许年春,吴同情,皮海洋,游 磊,吴 越,. 基于柔性承载板载荷试验的土抗剪强度参数反演研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 227-234.
[13] 尹君凡,雷 勇,陈秋南,刘一新,邓加政,. 偏心荷载下溶洞顶板冲切破坏上限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
[14] 杨和平,唐咸远,王兴正,肖 杰,倪 啸,. 有荷干湿循环条件下不同膨胀土抗剪强度基本特性[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2311-2317.
[15] 王 春, 唐礼忠, 程露萍, 陈 源, 刘 涛, 韦永恒, . 高轴压和围压共同作用下矽卡岩受频繁动态扰动时的动力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4537-4546.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!