岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 3255-3261.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0877

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于连续损伤的水平井射孔-近井筒三维破裂模拟

孙 峰1,薛世峰1,逄铭玉1,唐梅荣2,张翔2,李川2   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(华东) 储运与建筑工程学院,山东 青岛 266580; 2. 中国石油长庆油田油气工艺研究院,陕西 西安 710021
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-17 出版日期:2019-08-12 发布日期:2019-08-26
  • 通讯作者: 薛世峰,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事油气工程力学的基础理论与研究工作。E-mail: xuesf@126.com E-mail:upcsfeng@upc.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:孙峰,男,1979年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地下多物理场耦合方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51304230);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(No. 16CX05001A);国家留学基金委项目(No. 201706455025)。

3D simulation of fracture growth from perforation to near-wellbore in horizontal wells based on continuum damage model

SUN Feng1, XUE Shi-feng1, PANG Ming-yu1, TANG Mei-rong2, ZHANG Xiang2, LI Chuan2   

  1. 1. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China; 2. Oil and Gas Technology Research Institute, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710021, China
  • Received:2018-05-17 Online:2019-08-12 Published:2019-08-26
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51304230), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (16CX05001A) and the China Scholarship Council Fund (201706455025).

摘要: 射孔作为井筒与储层之间的液流通道,是水力压裂过程中的重要可控性参数。为研究水平井射孔-近井筒破裂机制,采用岩层变形-流体渗流方程描述应力状态变化,应用连续损伤破裂单元表征三维破裂位置与形态演化,并开发有限元求解程序模拟分析了射孔对水平井初始破裂压力、破裂位置及近井筒裂缝复杂性的调控作用。通过与解析模型及射孔压裂物理模型试验结果对比,验证了模型及有限元程序的有效性;水平井破裂压力数值分析结果与现场测试数据吻合较好。研究表明:射孔可调控水平井破裂压力与初始破裂位置,同时对近井筒区域裂缝扩展形态影响显著。通过优化射孔参数可以引导初始破裂向最优破裂面扩展、有效降低破裂压力,减小由于螺旋射孔空间排布引起的水平井近井筒裂缝迂曲与复杂程度,提高致密油气藏压裂改造效果。

关键词: 连续损伤, 水平井, 射孔参数, 近井筒破裂形态, 数值模拟

Abstract: Perforation provides fluid conduit between wellbore and reservoir, hence it is an important controllable parameter for hydraulic fracturing stimulations. Focusing on the mechanism of fracture growth from perforation to near-wellbore in horizontal wells, a hydro-mechanical coupling model was used to analyze the stress change, together with continuum-based damage elements to characterize the three-dimensional fracture propagation and geometry evolution. A finite element program was developed to investigate the effects of perforation on fracture initiation pressure, failure location and near-wellbore fracturing complexity. The model was validated against the results of analytical model and perforation fracture experiments. The simulation results of horizontal well fracture initiation pressure were coincided well with the records of field test. The results indicate that: perforation can be used to control the fracturing pressure and propagation behavior of the initial fracture, which has a further effect on the fracture geometry of near-wellbore region in horizontal wells. Optimizing perforation parameters can lead initial fracture extend toward the preferred fracture plane. The results could help to decrease the fracture pressure, reduce the tortuosity and complexity of near-wellbore fracture caused by the helical perforations, and improve the fracturing stimulation effects of tight oil and gas reservoirs.

Key words: continuum damage, horizontal well, perforation parameters, near-wellbore fracture geometry, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[2] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[3] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[4] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[5] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[6] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[7] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[8] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[9] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[10] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[11] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[12] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[13] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[14] 韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[15] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!