岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 4533-4542.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1496

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

岩石倾斜裂隙与水平裂隙扩展贯通试验 及数值模拟研究

魏超1,朱维申1,李勇1, 2,王书刚1,董振兴1,蔡卫兵1   

  1. 1. 山东大学 岩土与结构工程研究中心,山东 济南 250061;2. 山东大学 齐鲁交通学院,山东 济南 250002
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-13 出版日期:2019-11-11 发布日期:2019-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 李勇,男,1981年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩石力学与工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: yongli@sdu.edu.cn E-mail:weic0919@126.com
  • 作者简介:魏超,男,1990生,博士研究生,主要从事岩体裂纹扩展方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项(No. 41672281,No. 51579140,No.51879149);山东大学交叉学科基金(No. 2017JC001);山东大学齐鲁交通学院自由探索项目(No. 2019B47_1)

Experimental study and numerical simulation of inclined flaws and horizontal fissures propagation and coalescence process in rocks

WEI Chao1, ZHU Wei-shen1, LI Yong1, 2, WANG Shu-gang1, DONG Zhen-xing1, CAI Wei-bing1   

  1. 1. Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China; 2. School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250002, China
  • Received:2018-08-13 Online:2019-11-11 Published:2019-12-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41672281, 51579140, 51879149), the Interdisciplinary Foundation of Shandong University(2017JC001) and the Free Exploration Project of School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University (2019B47_1).

摘要: 采用最新配置的水泥砂浆材料,通过在试件中布置倾斜裂隙和水平裂隙,开展了单轴和双轴条件下的压缩试验,详细分析了不同加载条件下试件裂隙的扩展和贯通规律。试验结果表明:无裂隙内水压时,在单轴压缩条件下倾斜裂隙在扩展贯通水平裂隙后裂纹的扩展路径和方向发生明显改变,试样最终发生劈裂破坏。侧压的增大抑制了倾斜裂隙端部翼裂纹和次生裂纹的萌生,高侧压下翼裂纹没有贯穿水平裂隙,试样破坏模式变成了剪切破坏。水力耦合作用下,单轴压缩时倾斜裂隙翼裂纹尖端的最大主应力分布范围随着内水压的增大逐渐变小,翼裂纹的起裂应力、起裂角和峰值强度逐渐降低,试样发生劈裂破坏。通过数值模拟得到的裂纹扩展贯通规律与试验结果具有良好的一致性,开展了不同内水压时倾斜裂隙扩展贯通无水压的水平裂隙的数值分析,随着内水压的增加倾斜裂隙首先萌生共面裂纹随后产生翼裂纹,翼裂纹扩展贯通水平裂隙时扩展路径同样会发生改变。水力耦合作用下侧压也会抑制翼裂纹的萌生,随着内水压的增大减弱了侧压对倾斜裂隙翼裂纹的抑制作用。

关键词: 倾斜裂隙和水平裂隙, 裂隙扩展试验, 内水压, 数值模拟

Abstract: Using the newly developed cement mortar materials, horizontal natural fissures and inclined precast flaws were arranged in the testing specimens, and different tests were carried out under uniaxial and biaxial compression conditions. Crack propagation and penetration process under different loading conditions were analyzed in detail. The test results show that: the propagation path and direction of pre-cracks change significantly after the pre-cracks meet the natural fissures during the coalescence process, and the phenomenon of ‘displacement jump’ appears. The increase of lateral confining stress inhibits the initiation of wing cracks and secondary cracks on the inclined crack tips. Under high lateral confining stress, these cracks do not penetrate through natural fissures, and the failure mode changes from splitting to shear failure. Under the action of hydraulic coupling, the maximum principal stress distribution of the wing crack tip in uniaxial compression gradually decreases with increase of internal water pressure, and the initiation stress, initiation angle and peak strength are also gradually reduced. The crack propagation and penetration law obtained by numerical simulation is in good agreement with test results. The numerical analysis of inclined flaws with different internal water pressures extending through the waterless pressure horizontal fissures is carried out. With the increase of the water pressure, the inclined flaws firstly initiate the coplanar cracks and then generates the wing crack. When the wing crack propagates through the horizontal fissures, the expansion path also changes. Under the action of hydraulic coupling, the lateral pressure also suppresses the initiation of the wing crack. The increase of water pressure weakens the inhibition of lateral pressure on wing cracks.

Key words: inclined flaws and horizontal fissures, fissure propagation test, internal hydraulic pressure, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[2] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[3] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[4] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[5] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[6] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[7] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[8] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[9] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[10] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[11] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[12] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[13] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[14] 韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[15] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!