岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 245-252.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1599

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究

谢辉辉1, 2,许振浩2,刘清秉1,胡桂阳1   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学 教育部长江三峡库区地质灾害研究中心,湖北 武汉 430074; 2. 山东大学 岩土与结构工程研究中心,山东 济南 250016
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-31 出版日期:2019-08-01 发布日期:2019-08-16
  • 通讯作者: 刘清秉,男,1984年生,博士(后),副研究员,从事特殊土工程性质方面的科研工作。E-mail:liuqingbing_1357@163.com E-mail:939006077@qq.com
  • 作者简介:谢辉辉,男,1991年生,硕士研究生,从事岩土体工程性质方面研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.41572286)

Evolution of peak strength and residual strength of weak expansive soil under drying-wetting cycle paths

XIE Hui-hui1, 2, XU Zhen-hao2, LIU Qing-bing1, HU Gui-yang1   

  1. 1. Three Gorges Research Center for Geo-hazard, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. Research Center of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China
  • Received:2018-08-31 Online:2019-08-01 Published:2019-08-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41572286).

摘要: 膨胀土具有胀缩性、多裂隙性和超固结性,在自然条件下极易受到降雨和蒸发的干湿循环效应,土的抗剪强度会随着时间的延续而衰减,造成边坡失稳。以荆门弱膨胀土为研究对象,对经历不同干湿循环次数的荆门弱膨胀土开展环剪试验,并探讨分析其峰值强度和残余强度的变化规律。试验结果表明,试样的抗剪强度与法向压力的大小有关,无论是峰值强度还是残余强度均随着法向压力的增大而增大,同时法向压力越大,试样达到残余强度时所需要的剪切位移也会越小;随着干湿循环次数的增加,膨胀土的峰值强度明显衰减,残余强度虽略有变化但并不明显,可近似认为稳定;经历3次干湿循环后膨胀土的峰值黏聚力和残余黏聚力指标已经近乎一致,峰值内摩擦角和残余内摩擦角之间始终保持在2o左右的差异,基本不受循环次数的影响。

关键词: 膨胀土, 干湿循环, 环剪试验, 残余强度, 黏聚力

Abstract: Expansive soil is featured with expansibility, multi-crack and over consolidation. When exposed to natural conditions, it vulnerable to the drying-wetting cycle effect of rain and evaporation, thus the shear strength of expansive soil will decreases with time, resulting in expansive soil slope instability. A series of ring shear tests is conducted on weak expansive soil sampled from Jinmen, Hubei province under the condition of drying-wetting cycles to investigate the variation of peak strength and residual strength. Results show that the shear strength of the sample is related to the normal stress, both its peak strength and residual strength increase with the increase of normal stress. Meanwhile, the greater the normal stress is, the smaller the shear displacement is when the sample reaches the residual strength. As the drying-wetting cycle increases, the peak strength of the expansive soil obviously attenuates, while the residual strength of expansive soils varies slightly, but it is not obvious, which can be approximately considered stable as stable. The peak cohesion and residual cohesion of expansive soils after three dry-wet cycles are almost the same. The difference between the peak internal friction angle and residual internal friction angle is always 2°, which is largely unaffected by the number of drying-wetting cycles.

Key words: expansive soil, wetting-drying cycle, ring shear test, residual strength, cohesion

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 骆赵刚, 汪时机, 杨振北, . 膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2313-2323.
[2] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[3] 张宗堂, 高文华, 张志敏, 唐骁宇, 邬俊, . 基于Weibull分布的红砂岩颗粒崩解破碎演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 877-885.
[4] 程昊, 唐辉明, 吴琼, 雷国平. 一种考虑水力滞回效应的非饱和土弹塑性扩展 剑桥本构模型显式算法有限元实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 676-686.
[5] 刘祖强, 罗红明, 郑敏, 施云江, . 南水北调渠坡膨胀土胀缩特性及变形模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 409-414.
[6] 李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[7] 陈永青, 文畅平, 方炫强, . 生物酶改良膨胀土的修正殷宗泽模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3515-3523.
[8] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 南阳原状膨胀土不排水剪切性状时效性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2947-2955.
[9] 邵生俊, 陈 菲, 邓国华, . 基于平面应变统一强度公式的结构性黄土填料 挡墙地震被动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1255-1262.
[10] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 考虑卸荷速率的K0固结膨胀土应力-应变行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1299-1306.
[11] 任克彬, 王 博, 李新明, 尹 松, . 毛细水干湿循环作用下土遗址的强度特性 与孔隙分布特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 962-970.
[12] 江强强, 刘路路, 焦玉勇, 王 浩, . 干湿循环下滑带土强度特性与微观结构试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1005-1012.
[13] 谢凯楠, 姜德义, 孙中光, 宋中强, 王静怡, 杨 涛, 蒋 翔, . 基于低场核磁共振的干湿循环对泥质砂岩 微观结构劣化特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 653-659.
[14] 蔡正银, 朱 洵, 黄英豪, 张 晨. 冻融过程对膨胀土裂隙演化特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4555-4563.
[15] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 卸荷损伤原状膨胀土剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4685-4692.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!