岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 4685-4692.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1919

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

卸荷损伤原状膨胀土剪切力学特性试验研究

李新明1, 2,孔令伟2,郭爱国2   

  1. 1. 中原工学院 建筑工程学院,河南 郑州 450007;2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-16 出版日期:2019-12-11 发布日期:2020-01-04
  • 作者简介:李新明,男,1987年生,博士,副教授,主要从事特殊土力学及边坡工程方面的工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(No.51509274);国家自然科学基金重点项目(No.41430634);河南省高等学校重点科研项目计划(No.15A560013);河南省高等学校青年骨干教师资助计划项目(2019GGJS142)。

Experimental study on shear mechanical properties of unloading damaged undisturbed expansive soil

LI Xin-ming1, 2, KONG Ling-wei2, GUO Ai-guo2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China)
  • Received:2018-10-16 Online:2019-12-11 Published:2020-01-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scholars of China(51509274), the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41430634), the Key Scientific Research Projects Plan of Henan Higher Education Institutions(15A560013) and the Fund for Outstanding Young Teacher of Higher Education in Henan Province (2019GGJS142).

摘要: 通过GDS三轴试验系统对经历3种卸荷速率损伤后的原状南阳膨胀土样进行再加荷不排水三轴伸长剪切试验,同时考虑了超固结比与固结状态的影响。试验结果表明,膨胀土再加荷剪切力学特性与初始卸荷速率有关。在相同的轴向应变下,初始卸荷速率越小,其偏应力单调越小。在主应力方向改变前后,其应力?应变关系曲线斜率显著变化。相同固结方式与超固结比状态下,孔隙水压力均表现为先增大后减小趋势,孔隙水压力峰值应变随卸荷速率增大而减小。无论是等压固结还是K0固结,初始卸荷速率越大,不排水剪切强度越大。膨胀土样经历了初始卸荷损伤后,再加荷常规三轴伸长试验所得剪切强度均低于无损伤时的强度。以膨胀土破坏强度所得损伤度SD低估了卸荷速率对膨胀土的损伤程度,建议采用孔隙水压力峰值强度进行膨胀土边坡设计计算。原状膨胀土力学性状随卸荷速率损伤的演化规律受卸荷阶段轴向应变大小及裂隙性综合影响。

关键词: 膨胀土, 卸荷速率, 卸荷损伤, 剪切强度, 三轴试验

Abstract: To study the mechanical characteristics of unloading rate damage effect for Nanyang undisturbed expansive soil, the unloading-reloading undrained triaxial shear test was conducted with three unloading rates (0.02 kPa/min, 0.2 kPa/min and 2 kPa/min) through the GDS triaxial test system. The effect of over-consolidation ratio and consolidation state have also been studied. Test results showed that the shear mechanical properties of expansive soil are related to the initial unloading rate. Under the same axial strain, the deviatoric stress is smaller with lower initial unloading rate. The slope of stress-strain curve changed significantly before and after the principal stress direction rotation. Under the same consolidation state and over-consolidation ratio, pore water pressure increased first and then decreased. Peak pore water pressure strain decreases as the unloading rate increases. As the unloading rate decreases, the tangential modulus of the undisturbed expansive soil decreases monotonously. The higher the initial unloading rate, the greater the undrained shear strength. After the initial unloading damage of expansive soil sample, the shear strength obtained by reloading conventional triaxial elongation test was lower than that of non-damage soil sample under both isotropic consolidation and K0 consolidation. The damage degree SD obtained by the failure strength qf of expansive soil greatly underestimated the damage degree of the damage rate to expansive soil. It is recommended to use the strength of peak pore water pressure qumax to design and calculate the slope of expansive soil. The mechanical properties evolution of undisturbed expansive soil with unloading damage rate is influenced by the axial strain and cracking character.

Key words: expansive soil, unloading rate, unloading damage, shear strength, triaxial shear test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 43
[1] 孟庆彬, 王杰, 韩立军, 孙稳, 乔卫国, 王刚, . 极弱胶结岩石物理力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 19-29.
[2] 李丽华, 余肖婷, 肖衡林, 马强, 刘一鸣, 杨 星, . 稻壳灰加筋土力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[3] 杨志浩, 岳祖润, 冯怀平, . 非饱和粉土路基内水分迁移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2241-2251.
[4] 骆赵刚, 汪时机, 杨振北, . 膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2313-2323.
[5] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[6] 王康宇, 庄妍, 耿雪玉, . 铁路路基粗粒土填料临界动应力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[7] 樊科伟, 刘斯宏, 廖洁, 方斌昕, 王建磊, . 袋装石土工袋剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 477-484.
[8] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[9] 梁珂, 何杨, 陈国兴, . 南沙珊瑚砂的动剪切模量和阻尼比特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 23-31.
[10] 周家作, 韦昌富, 魏厚振, 杨周洁, 李力昕, 李彦龙, 丁根荣, . 多功能水合物沉积物三轴试验系统的研制与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 342-352.
[11] 高运昌, 高盟, 尹诗, . 聚氨酯固化海砂的静力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 231-236.
[12] 谢辉辉, 许振浩, 刘清秉, 胡桂阳, . 干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[13] 刘祖强, 罗红明, 郑敏, 施云江, . 南水北调渠坡膨胀土胀缩特性及变形模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 409-414.
[14] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 张广东, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, . 不同卸荷速率下矩形巷道变形及 声发射特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3309-3318.
[15] 孔亮, 刘文卓, 袁庆盟, 董彤, . 常剪应力路径下含气砂土的三轴试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3319-3326.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!