岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2078-2088.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0178

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

单级荷载下极软煤岩长期蠕变规律及本构模型研究

王兴开1, 2,夏才初1, 3,朱哲明4,谢文兵5,宋磊博1,韩观胜1   

  1. 1. 绍兴文理学院 土木工程学院,浙江 绍兴 312000;2. 绍兴文理学院 浙江省岩石力学与地质灾害重点实验室,浙江 绍兴 312000; 3. 宁波大学 土木与环境工程学院,浙江 宁波 315211;4. 四川大学 建筑与环境学院,四川 成都 610065; 5. 中国矿业大学 煤炭资源与安全开采国家重点实验室,江苏 徐州 221116
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-01 修回日期:2021-04-02 出版日期:2021-08-11 发布日期:2021-08-16
  • 通讯作者: 夏才初,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩石力学与地下工程方面的研究。E-mail: tjxiaccb@126.com E-mail:xingkai10@163.com
  • 作者简介:王兴开,男,1992年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩石力学与地下工程方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 42002275);浙江省自然科学基金(No. LQ21D020001,No. LQ21E040003,No. LQ20E040002);绍兴文理学院浙江省岩石力学与地质灾害重点实验室开放基金(No. ZJRMG-2020-01)。

Long-term creep law and constitutive model of extremely soft coal rock subjected to single-stage load

WANG Xing-kai1, 2, XIA Cai-chu1, 3, ZHU Zhe-ming4, XIE Wen-bing5, SONG Lei-bo1, HAN Guan-sheng1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics and Geohazards of Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China; 3. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China; 4. College of Architecture & Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China; 5. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China
  • Received:2021-02-01 Revised:2021-04-02 Online:2021-08-11 Published:2021-08-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42002275), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ21D020001, LQ21E040003, LQ20E040002) and the Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics and the Geohazards of Zhejiang Province for Shaoxing University (ZJRMG-2020-01).

摘要: 为探究极软煤岩的长期蠕变力学特性,利用自主开发的长期三轴岩石蠕变试验系统,开展单级荷载下极软煤岩单轴和三轴蠕变特性试验。结果表明:(1)单轴蠕变下极软煤岩历时232 h发生了衰减蠕变、稳态蠕变和加速蠕变,累积蠕变量高达3.45%,是瞬时变形量的10.5倍;稳态蠕变速率高达8×10–5~10×10–5/h且长时保持不变;加速蠕变阶段最大速率高达0.043/h;蠕变全程速率变化呈现出典型的U形曲线分布特征。(2)相同轴压下,随着围压由0增大至0.6 MPa,极软煤岩抵抗长期变形的能力不断增强,表现为蠕变量显著减小、稳态蠕变速率呈数量级式大幅减小、蠕变破坏前的持续时间显著增长、蠕变与瞬时应变量的比值明显降低、加速蠕变破坏的强烈程度显著减弱。蠕变速度和蠕变量尤其对0~0.2 MPa范围内的围压变化更加敏感。(3)极软煤岩的加速蠕变阶段表现为渐进式加速变形失稳,具有显著的时间过程,与普通岩石加速蠕变阶段突变式加速破裂失稳的特征不同。(4)引入关于加速蠕变启动时间的新型非线性黏塑性元件,与Burgers模型串联,建立了能描述单级荷载下极软煤岩衰减蠕变、稳态蠕变和加速蠕变全程的非线性黏弹塑性蠕变模型;基于Levenberg- Marquardt优化算法对试验曲线进行了非线性拟合,辨识了模型参数,试验曲线与拟合曲线吻合度极高,验证了模型的正确性。该研究成果可为极软岩长期非线性大变形理论分析和支护设计提供参考。

关键词: 极软煤岩, 单级荷载, 长期蠕变试验, 大变形, 非线性蠕变模型

Abstract: In order to study the long-term creep law of extremely soft coal rock, the uniaxial and triaxial creep tests of extremely soft coal rock subjected to single-stage loads were carried out by using the self-developed triaxial creep test system. The following results and conclusions are obtained. 1) In the uniaxial long-term creep test, decay creep stage, steady-state creep stage, and accelerated creep stage occur successively during 232 hours, and the cumulative creep strain is as high as 3.45%, which is 10.5 times of the instantaneous deformation. The strain rate for the total steady-state creep stage is as high as 8 ?10 /h, the maximum accelerated creep rate reaches up to 0.043/h, and the strain rate of total creep process is distributed in a U-shape. 2) In the triaxial long-term creep tests subjected to the same axial pressure (0.96 MPa), the ability of resisting long-term deformation of extremely soft coal rock increases continuously with the increase of confining pressure from 0 to 0.6 MPa, which is shown as follows: the creep strain decreases significantly, the strain rate of steady-state creep stage decreases by order of magnitudes, the duration before creep failure increases obviously, the ratio of creep to instantaneous strain decreases dramatically, the intensity of accelerated creep failure decreases markedly. The creep strain and deformation rate are especially sensitive to the confining pressure change in the range of 0?0.2 MPa. 3) The accelerated creep stage of extremely soft coal rock is characterized by “gradual” time dependent instability, which is significantly different from the “abrupt” accelerated fracture instability of ordinary rock. 4) By connecting a new nonlinear viscoelastic element considering the concept of accelerated creep start-up time with Burgers model in series, a nonlinear viscoelastic plastic creep model is established to describe the three creep stages of extremely soft coal rock subjected to single-stage load. Then, the creep parameters were identified by employing the Levenberg-Marquardt optimization algorithm. The fitting curves are highly consistent with the experimental curves, verifing the validity of the proposed model. These findings can provide reference for theoretical analysis of nonlinear large creep deformation and support design of extremely soft rock.

Key words: extremely soft coal rock, single-stage load, long-term creep test, large deformation, nonlinear creep model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 董青, 周正华, 苏杰, 李小军, 郝冰, . 基于对数动骨架的可考虑液化大变形本构[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1903-1910.
[2] 朱淳, 何满潮, 张晓虎, 陶志刚, 尹乾, 李利峰, . 恒阻大变形锚杆非线性力学模型 及恒阻行为影响参数分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1911-1924.
[3] 江文豪, 詹良通. 考虑井阻效应及径向渗透系数变化下砂井 地基的大变形固结[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 755-766.
[4] 雷升祥, 赵伟. 软岩隧道大变形环向让压支护机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1039-1047.
[5] 张传庆, 吕浩安, 刘小岩, 周辉, 高阳, 闫东明, . 隧道新型恒阻让压装置的工作机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 4045-4053.
[6] 程利兴, 姜鹏飞, 杨建威, 朱阳涛, 郑仰发, 张镇, 李冰冰, . 深井孤岛工作面巷道围岩采动应力分区演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 4078-4086.
[7] 雷江, 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 于洪丹, 马永尚, 谢华东, 王富刚, . 引红济石引水隧洞围岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3435-3446.
[8] 陈卫忠, 田 云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[9] 蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹, 郑俊杰, 周 洋, 闫 婧, 李展毅. 饱和软土大变形非线性自重固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[10] 周小文, 程 力, 周 密, 王 齐, . 离心机中球形贯入仪贯入黏土特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1713-1720.
[11] 魏 星, 张 昭, 王 刚, 张建民, . 饱和砂土液化后大变形机制的离散元细观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1596-1602.
[12] 刘泉声, 邓鹏海, 毕晨, 李伟伟, 刘军, . 深部巷道软弱围岩破裂碎胀过程及锚喷-注浆 加固FDEM数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4065-4083.
[13] 崔光耀, 祁家所, 王明胜, . 片理化玄武岩隧道围岩大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 231-237.
[14] 杨忠民,高永涛,吴顺川,成子桥,. 基于收敛–约束原理的大变形隧道初支更换时机优化研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 395-404.
[15] 周亚东,邓 安,鹿 群, . 非饱和土一维大变形固结模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1675-1682.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .