岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 2495-2508.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1433

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

平面应变条件下不同裂隙方向原状膨胀土变形破坏性状与剪切带演化特征

高志傲1, 2,孔令伟1, 2,王双娇2, 3,刘炳恒1, 2,芦剑锋1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点试验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所 页岩气与地质工程重点实验室,北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-16 接受日期:2022-11-09 出版日期:2023-09-11 发布日期:2023-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 孔令伟,男,1967年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土的力学特性与灾害防治技术研究。E-mail: lwkong@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:gaozhiao1997@163.com
  • 作者简介:高志傲,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事特殊土力学特性研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划资助项目(No.2019YFC1509901)

Deformation behavior and shear zone evolution characteristics of undisturbed expansive soil with different fissure directions under plane strain condition

GAO Zhi-ao1, 2, KONG Ling-wei1, 2, WANG Shuang-jiao2, 3, LIU Bing-heng1, 2, LU Jian-feng1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2022-09-16 Accepted:2022-11-09 Online:2023-09-11 Published:2023-09-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1509901).

摘要: 富含裂隙是膨胀土的重要特性之一,原生裂隙以及受力过程中的裂隙扩展对土的力学行为影响显著。为了调查裂隙对膨胀土的变形规律与破坏模式的影响,借助改进型真三轴仪,对不同原生裂隙主方向角的原状膨胀土(I型裂隙试样长轴垂直优势裂隙方向、II型裂隙试样长轴45º斜交优势裂隙方向、III型裂隙试样长轴平行优势裂隙方向),开展固结排水平面应变剪切试验,并利用数字图像相关(digital image correlation,简称DIC)技术分析变形规律,重点研究裂隙影响的变形局部化特征。结果表明:同一围压作用时,II型裂隙试样的峰值应力最小,应力−应变曲线呈应变软化型,其破坏类型为滑动破坏;I型裂隙试样峰值应力最大,且I型裂隙试样与III型裂隙试样的应力−应变曲线呈应变硬化型。I型裂隙试样的破坏类型为压缩剪切破坏,III型裂隙试样的破坏类型随围压不同而存在差异。同一围压作用下,I型裂隙试样产生的剪切带倾角较其他裂隙类型样品小,且基本不随围压变化。II型裂隙试样的剪切带沿原生裂隙面发育形成,其倾角大小随围压变化并无明显规律,围压影响II型裂隙土试样剪切带发育的数量。对于III型裂隙试样,围压影响剪切带发育类型,且随着围压增大,主剪切带倾角减小。利用Roscoe理论得到不同裂隙方向土样的剪切带倾角大小与试样实际破坏时剪切带的倾角较为符合。该试验为研究裂隙性膨胀土力学特征各向异性奠定了基础。

关键词: 膨胀土裂隙性, 平面应变试验, 数字图像相关技术, 剪切带演化

Abstract: The abundance of fissures is one of the important characteristics for expansive soils. The inherent fissures and fissure propagation during the loading process have a significant impact on the mechanical behavior of the soil. In order to investigate the influence of fissures on the deformation and failure mode of expansive soil, with the help of an improved true triaxial instrument, the undisturbed expansive soils with different inclination angles of inherent fissures (type I - the long axis of the sample is perpendicular to the dominant fissure direction, type II - the long axis of the sample is 45º oblique to the dominant fissure direction, and type III - the long axis of the sample is parallel to the dominant fissure direction) were used to conduct the consolidated drained plane-strain shear test. Meanwhile, the deformation was analyzed using digital image correlation (DIC) technology, focusing on the local deformation characteristics controlled by fissures. The results show that under the same confining pressure, the peak stress of the type-II fissured soil sample is the smallest, the stress−strain curve is of strain softening type, and its failure type is sliding failure. The peak stress of the type-I fissured soil sample is the largest, and the stress−strain curve is strain hardening type. The failure type of the type-I fissured sample is compression-shear failure, and the type-III fissured sample presents different failure forms due to different confining pressures. Under the same confining pressure, the inclination angle of the shear zone produced in the type-I fissured samples is smaller than that of other fissure types and basically does not change with the confining pressure. The shear zone of the type-II fissured sample develops along the original fracture surface, and its dip angle has no obvious regularity with the confining pressure. The confining pressure affects the number of shear zones developed in the type-II fissured samples. For type-III fissured samples, the confining pressure affects the development type of the shear zone, and as the confining pressure increases, the dip angle of the main shear zone decreases. Based on Roscoe’s theory, the inclination angle of the shear zone in the samples with different fissure directions is more in line with the inclination angle of the shear zone when the sample is actually damaged. This test lays a foundation for studying the anisotropic mechanical properties of fissured expansive soil.

Key words: fissured expansive soil, plane-strain test, digital image correlation, shear zone evolution

中图分类号: 

  • TU411
[1] 彭阳, 高永涛, 王文林, 甫尔卡特, 温建敏, 周喻, . 单侧限压缩煤岩组合体的破裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(增刊): 387-398.
[2] 赵凯, 邵帅, 邵生俊, 魏军政, 张少英, 张玉. 平面应变下原状黄土的剪切带研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 433-441.
[3] 彭守建, 张倩文, 许江, 陈奕安, 陈灿灿, 曹琦, 饶豪魁, . 基于三维数字图像相关技术的砂岩渗流-应力 耦合变形局部化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1197-1206.
[4] 史旦达, 俞快, 毛逸瑶, 原媛, 郝冬雪, 胡伟, . 松砂中双叶片螺旋锚上拔承载 及土体变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3059-3072.
[5] 孙文进, 金爱兵, 王树亮, 赵怡晴, 韦立昌, 贾玉春, . 基于DIC的高温砂岩劈裂力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 511-518.
[6] 徐浩淳, 金爱兵, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 韦立昌, . 高温层理砂岩劈裂力学特性及裂隙演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3069-3078.
[7] 金爱兵, 王树亮, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 陈帅军, 朱东风, . 基于DIC的3D打印交叉节理试件破裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3862-3872.
[8] 史旦达, 毛逸瑶, 杨勇, 原媛, 郝冬雪, . 基于DIC技术的砂土中圆形锚板上拔土体 变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3201-3213.
[9] 张伏光,蒋明镜, . 基坑土体卸荷平面应变试验离散元数值分析[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 339-348.
[10] 张 玉,邵生俊,陈 菲,丁 潇,张少军,. 不同应力路径条件下原状Q3黄土的强度特性及破坏方式试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 99-106.
[11] 王志杰,Felix Jacobs,Martin Ziegler,. 土工格栅横肋对加筋砾石强度与变形特性的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2234-2240.
[12] 张 玉,何 晖,赵 敏,李宝平,丁 潇. 平面应变条件下原状黄土侧向卸载变形与强度特性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1233-1242.
[13] 马永尚 ,陈卫忠 ,杨典森 ,杨建平 ,龚 哲,. 基于三维数字图像相关技术的脆性岩石破坏试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 117-123.
[14] 罗爱忠 ,邵生俊,. 新型卧式土工平面应变仪研制[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 2117-2124.
[15] 宋新江,徐海波. 平面应变条件下水泥土强度特性试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2325-2330.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .